Tumblr 101: Tips And Tricks To Get Started
Sebastian Thrun: Google's Driverless Car
Cutting-Edge Curricula Killing the Textbook
Throw away those old, heavy textbooks, kids. But don't get too excited. There will still be plenty of studying, just in a less back-breaking way. With many school systems crunched for money, there's a move toward digital learning in the classroom.According to The New York Times, classrooms may be devoid of traditional textbooks within the next five years. As previously reported, California is already digitizing curriculum, but educators in other states are championing the array of tools the Web has to offer, as well. Dr. Sheryl R. Abshire, chief technology officer for the Calcasieu Parish school system in Lake Charles, LA, told the Times that modern students think in less concrete ways than their forebears, so they need more fluid learning tools in the classroom. "They don't engage with textbooks that are finite, linear and rote," she says. However, the move toward digital learning isn't without naysayers. Some argue that it could widen the already large educational gap between the rich and poor since not all students have access to the Internet at home.
The best compromise might be digital 'flexbooks.' The CK-12 Foundation recently developed some of these gadgets, which can be customized to meet state standards, for review by California school systems. Founder Neeru Khosla told the Times that these open-source materials, which can be downloaded to a disc, printed, or used online, make more sense than even digital textbooks because "they can be anything you want." As much as we enjoyed uncovering past students' doodlings (the best in middle school humor), we must admit the passing of the tome-like textbooks will lead to healthier backs everywhere. [From: The New York Times]
16 Grammys Looks That Weren't Working
Whitney Houston Dead: Singer Dies at 48, Body Found in Beverly Hilton Hotel
Worst Movie Mistakes: Date Night Edition (PHOTOS)
Whitney Houston Autopsy: Cause of Death Determined?
Whitney Houston, Bobbi Kristina: Late Singer's Daughter Hospitalized
PHOTOS: President Obama's Kissing Technique
Whitney Houston Dead: Stars React to Legend's Sudden Death
Adele Five-Year Break? Singer Plans to Focus on Relationship, Write 'Happy Record'
How Hattie Lost 300 Pounds: 'I Was Ready To Do Whatever It Took To Survive'
Jennifer Hudson Whitney Tribute: Grammy President Reveals Why Singer Was Chosen for Musical Memorial
Grammy 2012 Winners' List: Adele Sweeps Music's Biggest Night
Matt Bomer Comes Out As Gay
3 Economic Misconceptions That Need to Die
5-Hour Energy: A Success Equal Parts Caffeine, Chemistry and Meditation
Grammy Awards 2012: The Best & Worst Of The Red Carpet!
People With Easy-To-Pronounce Names More Likely To Succeed, Study Says
Photos Of Dead Lacrosse Player's Injured Body Shown To Jury
12 Grammys Stars Who Gave Good Style
The Top 10 Slacker Colleges
15 Funny Valentine's Day Cards
Mystery Disease Kills Thousands
WATCH: 25 Million Tons Of Japan Tsunami Debris Headed Directly Our Way
15 Funny Valentine's Day Quotes
JUNGLE SURVIVAL: Marines Drink Snake Blood, Eat Insects
Oprah Under Fire For Controversial Tweet
PHOTOS: Thank God For Grown-Up Glamour
Scuba-Diving Murder Trial: Prosecutors Drop One Charge Against Husband
PHOTOS: Kate Spends Valentine's Day Solo!
Taylor Swift Does Great Depression Chic
PHOTO: Kate Upton Scores 'Sports Illustrated' Swimsuit Issue Cover!
PHOTOS: Beautiful Scars
The 13 Least Romantic Valentine's Day Gifts
Comments
3
Subscribe to commentsGaryAug 14th 2009 7:39AM
Ppamala, what are you smoking? What does that have to do with digital textbooks? Give us all a break.
tjstiegAug 14th 2009 11:18AM
The content of textbooks is dependebt upon who writes them just as the internet is dependent on who writes for them and what biases they have. Everyone assumes that what they read on line is the truth. Of course that isn't always so. Primary source verification is necessary to assure as best as possible the veracity of the text whether in book form or on the internet.
MattOct 7th 2009 3:35PM
I love how the new certitude that "modern students...don't engage with textbooks that are finite, linear and rote" so often gets used with a straight face and apparently without any expectation that it can be challenged. What does "don't" mean? "are not given a chance to?" And we're hearing a technology professional (surprise!) express the usual techie gripe against printed books in an unsupported assertion that the brain of the human species has changed recently. Excuse me while I go cough up a hairball. I'm reading above that kids "think in less concrete ways than their forebears." Really? What does "less concretely" mean? I have a 4 year old who thinks in ways I would describe as concretely and also in ways I would describe as "abstractly", but I don't believe her thinking processes are any different from what mine were at that age. It's an idiotic argument based on unfounded assumptions. Or are we saying simply that kids have to handle more simultaneous inputs of information these days? That's certainly true, but is the resultant inability to focus and to learn from what you call "finite" sources something we simply throw more addictive tools at? I think it makes more sense to asky why everyone suddenly has ADHD and return to a focus on the cognitive tools of learning, which teach kids how to teach themselves, instead of on the hardware and software tools, which teach kids how to look up information on a computer.