Texas Judge Orders Microsoft to Stop Selling Word
Leonard Davis, U.S. District Court Judge for the Eastern District of Texas, is putting himself in the headlines by issuing a permanent injunction against Microsoft, prohibiting the company from selling "Word products that have the capability of opening .XML, .DOCX or DOCM files." That, as all geeks know, includes both Office 2007 and the upcoming Office 2010.The ruling is in reaction to a complaint (PDF) filed by i4i, a company that created an add-in for Word allowing users to edit XML files. XML is a language, like HTML, designed for formatting documents, and is used as the basis for files in Microsoft Office, Apple's iWork, and online technologies like RSS. The plaintiff claims that by adding certain native XML-handling features to Word, Microsoft violated a patent i4i filed in 1998.
Davis's ruling (PDF) is quite severe. It prohibits the sale, import, testing, demonstration, and marketing of any version of Word with the feature. It even bars Microsoft from offering support to any XML-handling version already in a customer's possession. And just to add injury to insult, he ordered the Redmond,
The injunction is set to go into effect in 60 days, but Microsoft plans to appeal the decision. Admittedly, we haven't dug into the code for Word or the i4i add-in, but unless i4i can prove Microsoft simply copy-and-pasted its product into Word, we don't expect this injunction to stand up. [From: Seattle Post Intelligencer via Engadget]





Live from Microsoft's New Generation Xbox event!
Xbox Reveal liveblog on Joystiq
Dozens Killed in Oklahoma Tornado; Death Toll to Rise
Justin Bieber Booed, Gets Standing Ovation at Billboard Music Awards
2013 Billboard Music Awards Best and Worst Dressed
Watch: Kansas Meteorologist Seeks Shelter From Tornado
Xbox One architecture panel liveblog!
Two Pilots Fired After Brazilian Pop Star Takes Captain's Seat Mid-Flight
Selena Gomez Leaving Justin Bieber's House: Booty Call Rumors Swirl
Oldest Water on Earth Found Deep Underground















Comments
2
Subscribe to commentsdixie1775Aug 13th 2009 8:08AM
Don't you mean Redmond, Washington??
handydan918Aug 13th 2009 4:52PM
"Admittedly, we haven't dug into the code for Word or the i4i add-in, but unless i4i can prove Microsoft simply copy-and-pasted its product into Word, we don't expect this injunction to stand up."
Wow. Really? You write for this cyber rag and you don't understand the diff between software patents and copyright?
Really?
If there is absolutely NO copied code, that doesn't protect Redmond in any way shape or form from a valid patent violation lawsuit. Or the subsequent judgement.
Learn about it before you presume to write about it....