Woman Falls Victim to Man's Baby Fetish, Via Craigslist

After hearing this story, many folks will never again look for jobs on Craigslist. A kind-hearted woman looking to make an extra buck was duped into playing along with a man's fetish.
According to a report by Florida's WKMG last month, Janet Schulte, of Melbourne, Florida, answered an ad on the classifieds site to care for a man's older brother who supposedly had a "diminished mental capacity." Schulte took the job and went to work -- feeding the man with a baby bottle and changing his adult diapers. Every time she asked to meet the disabled man's brother, she was given an excuse. When Schulte's weekly $600 payments started arriving late, she and her husband looked into the situation.
According to a report on NBC Miami this Monday, the couple discovered, to their disgust, that the man with the "diminished mental capacity" and the 'brother' who posted the ad were, in fact, the same person. For weeks, she'd just been playing into his baby fetish. (WKMG's earlier report suggests that the diaper-wearer, identified as Ryan, does indeed have a brother, named Mike, although Mike denied any knowledge of the circumstances to WKMG reporters.) To make things worse, NBC Miami reports that there's nothing the Schultes can do, since the man (or men) didn't technically commit a crime.
From the outside looking in, it's easy to wonder how Schulte could be fooled so easily. But $600 a week can make even the sharpest eye blind to a situation. Hopefully, there's at least some way for Schulte to get the money this weirdo owes her. If not, her husband should step in and give this guy the spanking he deserves. [From: WKMG/Florida Today and NBC Miami]
10 Most Unfortunate E-mails
A Bit Much
While it's acceptable to flirt over e-mail, there's a limit, and Joseph Dobbie went flying past it. In 2006, Dobbie met a woman at a barbecue and sent her a message after to ask her out for coffee. But he continued on, saying things like "Your smile is the freshest of my special memories. I will keep it with me for moments when I need to find a smile of my own." She thought it was over the top, forwarded it to her sister, who sent it on, and you know the rest. Dobbie was unfazed however, telling the press he'd received hundreds of romantic proposals.
The Breakup
As we've said, ending a relationship over e-mail is a bad way to go, but in 2003, Paul Kelly Tripplehorn, Jr. took it to another level. An intern for Texas Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison, Tripplehorn sent a vicious breakup letter to his now ex-girlfriend Michele, capping it with a signature that read, "your intellectual, moral, social, and emotional superior." The e-mail was sent all over, and Tripplehorn was fired. He later expressed deep regret over the incident and tragically committed suicide last fall.
CHUNG
In 2001, Peter Chung, a young Princeton grad who recently started a banking job in South Korea, sent an email to some former coworkers that ended up getting forwarded to millions. Rather than just let them know how he was doing, the banker, who referred to himself in the third person as CHUNG, bragged about going to clubs, getting phone numbers, and needing more condoms because he'd sleep with every woman in the country. The e-mail was forwarded around Wall Street, got back to his bosses, and he got canned.
The Dish
This e-mail from a woman describing her date in completely materialistic terms should strike a chord with anyone who's frustrated with the upper crust these days. Jacqueline Kim's e-mail to friends grading most parts of her date with Casey O'Brien, which she titled "The Dish," hit the Internet because of its emphasis on his money and looks. It's difficult to pinpoint the most vapid moment, but we'll go with her describing his boat, which only sat six people. Kim's phone number was included in the email, subjecting her to a bevy of fun calls.
Insensitive Much?
Revenge against a crappy boss is a joy few of us ever get to experience, but secretary Jenny Amner did just that by CC'ing a few coworkers in a mean exchange. Her boss, Richard Phillips, a high-salaried senior associate at the world's biggest law firm, Baker & McKenzie, e-mailed Amner to ask for £4 for dry cleaning costs after she accidentally spilled ketchup on his pants -- while she was away at her mother's funeral. She replied to the e-mail, copying 250 other employees on it, and said "I must apologise for not getting back to you straight away but due to my mother's sudden illness, death and funeral I have more pressing issues than your £4." The e-mail was forwarded out from there, and Phillips ended up leaving his job. Beautiful.
Layoffs
One of the worst parts about working for a struggling company is not knowing if your job is safe. Even worse is when an HR exec accidentally sends out a company-wide e-mail sends that was supposed to tell senior management how to handle impending layoffs, so not only did people know there would be firings, they knew how they would happen. This all happened last September at media agency Carat. As AdAge published portions of the email, it was clear that this was definitely not for the common worker's eyes. Oops.
The Hollywood Madam
Last August, the head of a high class prostitution ring in Los Angeles accidentally CC'd almost 50 clients in an e-mail that was supposed to go to only one client. While the names have never been released, Scandalist alleged that the list included a movie producer, club owners, a politician, a major sports team owner, and a prince. We imagine it must have been a nervous few weeks for them.
Best Party Ever
In 2006, Lucy Gao, a Citigroup intern, sent out an e-mail to 39 friends regarding her upcoming 21st birthday at a fancy hotel. That's usually fine, except Gao felt the need to detail her guests' behavior down to what they could wear, what exactly they should say to hotel staff, and when she would be accepting presents. Her coworkers forwarded it and it hit the press, which led Gao to say it was a joke that had gotten out of control. Her coworkers thought otherwise, but she kept her job.
The Worst
22-year-old banking clerk Trevor Luxton sent an e-mail to friends about having an encounter with a woman while talking to his girlfriend on the phone. He braggingly recounted the tale and asked whether he was the "worst boyfriend in the world or what?" At least one of the friends decided to share it with others and it seemed most people thought he was the worst. One person who didn't, however, was the girlfriend, who apparently accepted his marriage proposal.
Yummy?
An exchange between Claire Swire and her boyfriend became one of the first repeatedly forwarded e-mail blunders. What happened was the boyfriend sent Swire a joke about oral sex, to which she replied that his semen was particularly "yum" and made for great hair conditioner. The boyfriend proudly forwarded the exchange to some colleagues, who then did the same, resulting in a public shaming for both. There's some question to the validity of the whole thing, probably raised by Swire and the boyfriend themselves, but it seems legit.





Disney World Scammers Scored Four Years of Free Vacations
Stranger's Kiss Keeps 16-Year-Old From Committing Suicide
Rookie Cop Reportedly Berated, Called 'A Rat' For Arresting Off-Duty Officer
Walmart Ending Membership in Conservative Group
How I Went Bankrupt at 23
Can a New Guy Save Best Buy?
Woman Claims Kangaroo Stalked Her for 2 Days, Then Attacked
Facebook, Week Two: Fortunes Made and Fortunes Lost (Mostly Lost)
Pete Cosey Dead: Chicago Guitar Great and Miles Davis Collaborator Dies at 68
A Journey To The Hottest Place On Earth: Dallol Ethiopia














Comments
79
Subscribe to commentskloAug 16th 2009 10:02PM
what a sick sick man. that poor woman! i'm glad she is okay!
wfrank7697Aug 14th 2009 5:15PM
Everyone has the right to be stupid, some people just abuse the privilege.
AndrewAug 14th 2009 5:36PM
Uh, the first clue these ads were from a perv...they were on Craigslist.
beaupowerazAug 14th 2009 5:37PM
Sounds like a fun fetish. How do I sign up?
bookerclaimsAug 14th 2009 6:26PM
Raise my rent. Hopefully, this guy didn't crap but once or twice a day. And , she didnt know he was a mental case.
sparkysparkolaAug 14th 2009 6:30PM
600 bucks a week is alot to change a diaper...He still hiring?
ronaldAug 14th 2009 6:33PM
he did commite a crome he never payed her her 600 dollars its a scam.
LBris10679Aug 14th 2009 6:39PM
I'd take care of a big baby for $600 a week.
truepleasureAug 14th 2009 6:48PM
LMAO cant figure out who the bigger idiot is her for going along with this or the diaper wearing freak
KristinaAug 14th 2009 6:58PM
The easiest way I ever earned extra cash during lean times, was babysitting a gentleman with ABF. Adult Baby Fetish. He was a VP of a local bank. He was kind and considerate, and only relaxed when he was playing an infant or toddler. He dressed in jammies. I fed him pudding, watched Winnie the Pooh videos with him, fed him crackers, and played blocks. At night I tucked him in to his bed with rails on the side, to mock a crib. Put on a tape of lullabies, and let myself out. For 2.0 hours, he gave me $100 cash, every week. I don't judge him. It was safe and sane and he was never improper. Pity the guy in this story couldn't just be honest.
jonathon-mirzaOct 22nd 2010 3:33AM
@(Unverified) i wish me had dat kind dof money i would pay dat for da same thing just for an hour if mes could afford dat
please not this is not an advert im making just a self observation
aigaveepAug 14th 2009 7:17PM
Meh, it's not a crime to have a fetish. The guy needs to own his fetish and use craigslist to find willing partners, not to dupe people who want to be unlicensed caretakers. Still, I'm shocked at the opinion put forward in this article and in these comments that he should be punished. Believe it or not, offending a person is not always a crime. Sometimes in our country, it's perfectly legal to be a little weird and to make people angry.
As for all the fuss over her getting paid - I'm assuming she never signed a contract, seeing as she never met the person she thought was employing her. In that case she probably has no legal recourse. I disagree with the article saying she's a "kind-hearted" person. She probably wanted to make $600 a week without paying taxes. It's clear that she wasn't going to receive any tax forms, considering she never met with her employer. Now, earning an income without paying taxes actually IS a crime. I'm not trying to paint her as the bad guy, but she's not the innocent that she's made out to be.
If you accept a job that has no paper trail because you'll be able to make money outside of the system, you run the risk that people will use you. In this case, the law is probably going soft on her because she was used - if they wanted to, they could shake her down for a statement of funds earned, licenses, certification, etc. She should be grateful that they are not asking her to answer for all of that and just walk away.
LinnyAug 14th 2009 7:26PM
I don't care if the guys a pervert to each there own. Besides he probably likes being smacked around or spanked i can't whip out the wooden spoon! you want to pay me 600 bucks a week ill change the dang diapers....
Friskkkwhisk2AOL.comAug 14th 2009 7:33PM
This woman was just plain STUPID.
pelkthefish2Aug 14th 2009 7:40PM
i saw something like this on csi las vegasa fe years back. thought to myself no way this could really happen, guess again
ScarletSep 3rd 2009 7:06PM
He should have just called an ABDL Nanny instead of misleading this woman.
DonTSep 7th 2009 9:59AM
So it's OK for her to do and see all the things she did when the man she's doing it to is thought to have "diminished capacity", but if he's in control, somehow the same sight - a naked man, is horrifying. Give me a break. It's societal conditioning - it's always OK for any woman to see a naked man - no big deal - as long as SHE's the one in control, like female reporters in the men's locker room. Or any of our female workers in halfway homes or group homes bathing male clients. Otherwise it's indecent exposure. It didn't bother her to see and touch him when she thought she had the upper hand. He never threatened her, or molested her. NOTHING in this situation changed, except who was running the show.
BabyJhonnyOct 19th 2010 3:16AM
As an Adult Baby myself it saddens me to think that there are so many in the geniral public that have this misconception that people with a Diaper Fetish are Freaks, Pedophiles, criminals or eaven sick. So i will try to set the record streight here. What is a Fetish ? The Oxford English Dictionary defines the word fetish as "A Sexual attraction to a Non-Sexual part of the Body or Object" a Diaper is a "Non-Sexual Object" Diaper Lovers are sexualy attracted to the diaper itself not the wearer of the diaper. The man who claimed to be disabled (wich really annoys me because i am disabled i have Aspergers Syndrome, Epilepsy, Severe Dyscalculia, Mild Dyslexia traits of OCD and Reactive Depreshion and what he did has got to be against the Disability Discrimination Act) is not a Diaper Lover. He is an Adult Baby, just like me. An Adult Baby is emotionaly and psycologicaly driven, they find comfort, warmth, security and trust in wearing diapers and acting like a baby. This Man was looking for a Mummy and chose to go about it in a very very wrong way. Normaly when an Adult Baby goes looking for a Mummy or Daddy we post advertismeants within the Infantilism community (infantilism is the umbrella term that both Adult Baby and Diaper Lover come under as well as many others such as Baby Fur(a person who plays the part of a baby animal ie: a kitten, puppy or cub in diapers), littile girl / littile boy (a person who plays the part of a young child between the age of 4 and 7 in diapers) or toddler boy / toddler girl (a person that plays the part of a toddler boy or girl between the age of 2 and 4) however Infantilism is Adult only and in every catigory real children, toddlers or babies are never involved) as there are many websites within the community that are geared up specificaly for advertising for a Mummy or Daddy. The Infantilism Community is strongly against Child Pornography and Pedophilia of any kind. We ourselfs take an active role to purge these sickos from the internet by reporting anywebsites that we come across. I dont know if anyone here has herd of the website yior-thecobb but it was the infantilism community that first notified the online parenting community of that website. For those of you who dont know That site was stealing images of children in nappys and posting them on the net. With the help of the pnline parenting community we shut them down and put the pedophile known as Brian Cobb (the owner of that website) behind bars. the same thing needs to be done for imgsrc.ru a rushian photo site that opirates similarly to webshots. if you type the word diaper in to there search box, many of the photo albums that dont have passwords on them contain images of children and toddlers in diapers, some are eaven in sexual poses, if you search simply for the word kids you find the true horror of this website. Albums containing images of child models, images of naked children, children in nothing but there underware posing sexualy. Worse then this are the commeants people post. It is clear that it is some kind of pedopile image swap ring. http://www.imgsrc.ru needs to be shut down. As for this Man claiming disability, if anyone knows how to contact him, i would like to talk to him, all he wanted was someone to mummy him, he just whent about it the wrong way. Anyone who is an Infantilist grows up with guilt, secrecy and shame from the momeant they realise it. And we realise our intrest in diapers at a young age, we dont always understand it when we first realise it, alot of us have to deal with confushion as well. But untill we accept ourselfs and realise exactly wich catigory of Infantilism we fit in to, and untill we are accepted by those closest to us we all Fear being cought. I first Realised i had an intrest in diapers about the same time my so called father started abusing me, i was 3 he had just done a very bad thing to me that day and that night i wet the bed probibly because i was subconchiously scared he would come and do it again. Once was enough it hurt the first time and i dident want to go through that again. Now i had been potty trained for day time when i was 6 months old and night time when i was 11 months old acording to my mum. So the following night she put me in a nappy, and the same thing happend i wet again, but i was comforted by the fact that the nappy was there to protect me and my bed. This wheant on for about 4 years till i was 7 ish when i suddenly stopped wetting at night, but he did not stop abusing me. The next day my mum gave me my pants back for the night, now with my 7 year old mind it occured to me maybe if i wet the bed i will get my nappies. Thats not what happend, my mum came in to check i was asleep like she always did and cought me peeing on the bed. angrily she changed the sheets, told him and i got beat for the next hour or so. When i woke to find that i had wet the bed anyway that morning after all that, mum naturaly thought i had done it on purpose, and i got another beaten, im sorry i cant continue this is getting to emotionaly painful for me. You will find that many Infantilists when they tell there true life story's of how they got involved with nappys offten have simmileraritys in their tales. Abuse, Bedwetting, Sibling Rivrilry / Jealousy, Neglect, Bullying, Traumatic Eavents all crop up in the true life storys of infantilists. All Infantilists that fall in to those catigorys of those who wear and use diapers are nearly always submisive, we dont do drugs, drink, have one night stands or sexualy cheat, we dont gamble and we are not violent. It is only those Infantilists that fall in to the catigorys of the care taker role such as Mummy, Daddy, Aunty, Nanny, Big Sistor, Big Brother, Uncle, Grand Pa, Grand Ma, Cousin, Baby Sittor or Nurse that are dominent and eaven the majority of those in these roles are not criminales. The Infantilist Community is very carefull about who they accept. The Catigory of Teen Baby those physicaly between the age of 13 and 19 was set up to support teens that have discoverd they have an intrest in diapers. Only a select few of the adults from the infantilisim community are aloud to work with the Teen Baby Community and these Adults are always those that are employed in jobs that require Child Protection qualifications. Jobs such as the Police Force, Pediatrics, Psycologists, Psychiatrists, Doctors, Fire Departmeant, Child Protection Departmeant, Schools and Social Servises. The Adults that work with the Teen Baby Community do so for the explicit purpose of keeping the Adult Infantilisim community seprate from the Teen Baby Community and selecting modirators from the Teen Baby Community to modirate the forums. Only a Teen Baby between the ages of 17 and 19 that has shown maturity can modirate a Teen Baby Forum and posting images in the Teen Baby Community is strictly prohibited and results in imediate expulshion. You must be 13 to enter the Teen Baby Community and you have to leave when your on your 20th birthday at wich point you can join the Adult Community. Any Child Pornographic or Pedophilic material wich is picked up in the Teen Baby community is reported straight to both the police and if severe enough the members parents as the parents have a right to know. The Adult Administrators of the Teen Baby Community know everything that goes on within the Teen Baby Community. The Teen Baby Community is not for encouraging teenagers to become babes or sexualy atracted to diapers as adults, it is there for teens to support teens. As i have said before all infantilists grow up with guilt, shame and secrecy from the moment we first realise our intrest in nappys, and we realise it at a young age. I myself realised it when i was 3. Untill we have acceptance in our lives from those closest to us we live with constant Fear of getting cought, and untill we recognise wich catigory of infantilism we fit in to, we also live with that constint confushion in the back of our minds. Why do i like peeing my bed ? Why do i like wearing my littile sistors pullups? Why do i go looking for diapers in the trash? These are all questions that the Teen Baby Community can help to provide awnsers to, and it is the teens themselfs that provide the awnsers. Not us. You would be suprised the amount of unsanitary un hygenic and dangorus methods Teen Babies (TB for short) come up with for aquiering nappies weather used or clean. The TB Community offers advice on how to get hold of diapers safley as many teenagers dont have any idea that adult diapers exsist, and many think they are the only one in the world. America has a total population of well over 100 million acording to statistics there are just over 64 million infantilists in America. I Live in Bournemouth in the UK I know 8 infantilists in Bournemouth that i have personaly met. This is not as rare as people think. It is Taboo for one reason only, because know one talks about it psycologists dont know anything about it unless they are part of the community and the same goes for the psychiatrists. It is not an illness of the mind, it is not a disese or a sickness and it is certinaly not, as Jerry Springer called it "Adult Baby Syndrome", it is a lifestyle. Infantilists have jobs, we have familys, we have partners, we have husbands, wives, some of us are lesbian, some of us are Asexual (like me), some of us are Straight, some of us are Gay, some of us eaven have children, those of us that have children keep our children seprate from our infantilism, some of us have disabilitys (like me), some of us are white, some of us are black, some of us are ashian, some of us are mixed, some of us are religous, some of us are athiest (like me), some of us are old, some of us are young, some of us are incontinent and have to wear 24/7 for a medical reason, some of us are not. If diffrence is so much a part of humanitys psychy then i dont think i want to be human. If we cant accept that mankind is simply following a blueprint that was implanted in to all of us by brainwashing when we were potty trained, that "Diapers / Nappies are gross, babyish, smelly, uncomfortible and not for big boys and girls" "and you want to be a big boy / girl dont you" if that has been so deeply imprented in to your psycological makeup, in to your subconchous mind that you can not entertain the thought, "Why do real toddlers / babies sometimes hate having a diaper / nappy change eaven though they dont have a rash? Because a Diaper / Nappy is not as uncomfortable as you were lead to belive when you were potty trained! it is warm and damp and poop remains warm and it is gooey and squishy and the only problem is the smell and you adjust to that over time thats why some babies and toddlers dont like having a diaper / nappie change because its comfortable!" if you can not entertain that fact then you have been more brain washed by your potty training then potty trained. And no im not trying to get you to try it lol, thats just looking at it from both a philisophical point of view and a psycological point of view. (yes i already know im a geek that cant spell) I have been trying to explain infantilisim to the geniral public for almost a year now. so i already know someone (if they allow this to stay up) is going to reply, "you like to sit in your own shitty diaper grosss whats wrong with you dude go drown yourself in a toilet" at least it will be something along those lines so here is a reply to that. I dont appreciate haters, if you cant say anything civil then obviously you havent taken the time to read the entire post and clearly dont understand what Aspergers Syndrome is so here is a brief explination of Aspergers Syndrome. Aspergers Syndrome is a Mild Form of High Functining Autisim. It is classed as an Autistic Spectrum Disorder. All ASD's have 3 primary Symptoms, Social Difficultys, Communication Difficultys and Preceptual Difficultys. Aspergers Syndrome also has the 4th of Difficulty with Body Language. People with Aspergers Syndrome tend to be highly unique, while there are many diffrent symptoms for Aspergers Syndrome not everyone with Aspergers Syndrome has them all. For example, it is common to see Epilepsy in people with Aspergers Syndrome but not everyone with Aspergers Syndrome has Epilepsy, just like the majority of people with Aspergers Syndrome cant hold Eye contact i am able to do that. Most people with Aspergers Syndrome dont have Learning Difficulties, I have Severe Dyscalculia and Mild Dyslexia. So while i may have learnt to tell the time at 21 i bet who ever it is thats going to post the post for this reply as i expect, i bet you cant tell me why a new borns poop is black and what the 4 primary amino acids are in DNA and what DNA stands for and what CMOS stands for and what BIOS stands for and what the diffrent components of an adults poop is, and how many dopamine channals there are in the brain, and were the blarney stone is, and what the purpose of a MOSFET is. And i bet i can tell you something about your childhood as well. (no offense or insult intended there but i really hate hatters haveing been bullyed all through my school years without any friends to turn to i know a thing or to about bullying, and who ever it is that posts the post for this reply, your an uncivil cyber bully without either the guts to say that to my face or the bully that bullied you. And that makes you a coward and a cheaky one at that for posting it in the first place since i already replied)
Some one always posts something along those lines when replying to my explinations of Infantilism so i figured i would just reply to that as well and get it out the way.
Sorry it was so long i had to stop a few times and compose myself, that wasent accactly easy for me to write, that was emotionaly painful, had me in tears a few times.
jonathon-mirzaOct 22nd 2010 3:34AM
were do you click to login ?