25 Years Later: Does Cyberpunk Classic 'Neuromancer' Hold Up?
'The Matrix', 'Strange Days', and even 'Hackers' have all cribbed from William Gibson's cyberpunk masterpiece 'Neuromancer', which celebrated its 25th birthday on Tuesday. Written in 1984, Gibson's hyper-futuristic novel follows a super hacker named Case as he executes amazing cyber-feats, hired by a shadowy organization that immediately raise his suspicions.When a former employer rendered Case unable to "jack-in" (literally, using electrodes) by frying his neurons so they were unable to receive information, Case accepts a job from a mysterious man who claims to be able to repair his brain. Alongside his bodyguard Molly, who has augmented senses like extendable fingernails and night-vision eyes, Case explores cyberspace and his new job, finding much more than he intended.
PCWorld looks back on the book, credited for coining the term 'cyberspace,' and how it affected technology today. While some of Gibson's ideas seem fantastic, his notions of the Web and how we use it are eerily accurate -- PCWorld goes as far to suggest that his writing may have influenced its constructs. Where 'Neuromancer' succeeds is considering how the Internet works, with getting online via millions of entry points, accessing information globally.
Gibson's notion of cyberspace is still a long way off, but is reflected in sites like 'Second Life,' where the Net takes tangible, actual forms in buildings and simulations. He puts virtual reality online, much like this 'Futurama' moment. He also fuses plastic surgery and technology, allowing his character's 'microsofts' to enhance their knowledge. Molly, of course, has physical cosmetic advantages, like increased reflexes.
Some of Gibson's other ideas are still far in the future, like 'simstim', which allows two consciousnesses to be in one body, and surfing the Net by 'jacking in' through the brain. Also, the artificial intelligence Case faces exists only online and like a super advanced AIM bot, studying humanity and able to interface with it.
The bottom line is, 'Neuromancer' looked forward successfully, writing a novel about technology that we are still trying to catch up to. Twenty-five years later, it's still as relevant as ever.





The Money Man Behind Rick Santorum: Who Is Foster S. Friess?
Can You Guess This Famous Face?
Savings Experiment: Snow Removal
Tips for flying cheaper in 2012
It's Pink!
Katy Perry Divorce: With No Prenup How Much Will Russell Walk Away With?
Boss Indifferent To My Suicidal Impulse, Says Stock Trader Who Lost Millions
James Sturm Boycotts 'The Avengers' Film over Marvel's Treatment of Jack Kirby
Alleged Squatters Found With Drugs, Handgun, Grenades, Pig
Apple announcing iPad 3 first week of March? Anonymous sources think so













Comments
3
Subscribe to commentswillow reedJul 4th 2009 12:51PM
I love Gibson's work. The Matrix is Neuromancer in movie form. Pretty nifty if you ask me.
willow reedJul 4th 2009 12:55PM
Actually, my favorite from the Neuromancer trilogy is Count Zero. I liked that one the best.
willow reedJul 4th 2009 1:01PM
I dont think "jacking in" is too far off in the future. You see now that we can implant chips in pets and (I assume) children. We have GPS devices, even our phones can be traced via the cell towers their signals bounce off of. "Jacking in" is merely an extension of those ideas. I think it will involve nanotechnology, which is also close.
For all those bible people, run away run away, everyone will have a chip in them and the number will be 666. :)