<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Switched - Comments for Unsolicited Text Messages as Bad as Phone Calls, Court Says</title>
<link>http://www.switched.com/2009/06/24/unsolicited-text-messages-as-bad-as-phone-calls-court-says/</link>
<description>Switched Comments for Unsolicited Text Messages as Bad as Phone Calls, Court Says</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Unsolicited Text Messages as Bad as Phone Calls, Court Says]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/06/24/unsolicited-text-messages-as-bad-as-phone-calls-court-says/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/06/24/unsolicited-text-messages-as-bad-as-phone-calls-court-says/</guid><description><![CDATA[You know, its a bit lame to target the employee that sent the messages out. The employees follow the direction of the management, and at the time the message was sent, there was no precedent on messaging being used in this way. The people who received the messages has opted-in to receive text message from third-parties. I agree that looking at this case, moving forward SMS should be included in laws that prohibit spam, but to retroactively fine ipsh and S&S millions of dollars rings of Ex Post Facto judgments to me.. and last time I checked, the Constitution prohibited that. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2009 9:26PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
