<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Switched - Comments for Could a 'Synthetic Tree' Be Better than the Real Thing?</title>
<link>http://www.switched.com/2009/06/23/scientists-build-synthetic-tree-to-battle-carbon-emissions/</link>
<description>Switched Comments for Could a 'Synthetic Tree' Be Better than the Real Thing?</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Could a 'Synthetic Tree' Be Better than the Real Thing?]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/06/23/scientists-build-synthetic-tree-to-battle-carbon-emissions/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/06/23/scientists-build-synthetic-tree-to-battle-carbon-emissions/</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't think this makes sense from a residential/community standpoint, but I can think of at least three areas where setting this up would be beneficial or (at least) not detrimental<br><br>1)  Near already built industrial areas (anything with a smoke stack sending out large volume CO2 amounts)<br>2)  Near already existing community utility areas (waste water treatment plants, integrated into water towers, electrical stations)<br>3)  Near major commerce outlets with high traffic patterns (attach one to every mall in America for a tax break)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 24th 2009 9:59AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
