Could a 'Synthetic Tree' Be Better than the Real Thing?
In an ongoing effort to lower our level of carbon emissions, Columbia University scientists are looking to God for answers. While the 'Synthetic Tree' doesn't look anything like the oak or poplar in our back yard, it performs the same function -- maybe even better than the real thing, too. Professor Klaus Lackner told CNN that the 'Synthetic Tree' could be capable of capturing carbon 1,000 times faster than a living tree. Here's how it works: plastic 'leaves' direct wind into chambers, where carbon is trapped, converted into liquid carbon dioxide and stored. Lackner is writing a proposal to the U.S. Department of Energy for consideration, and he says that the technology is cost-effective.
The 'Synthetic Tree' isn't even close to production stage yet, and we wonder where Lackner proposes all these 'stations' would be placed. Judging by the sketch, the design doesn't exactly blend into the environment, and we imagine many folks would cry foul when they saw this out their window. While green gadgets are all the buzz, we'll wait and see how this idea pans out. [From CNN]





Whitney Houston Autopsy: Cause of Death Determined?
Whitney Houston, Bobbi Kristina: Late Singer's Daughter Hospitalized
Adele Five-Year Break? Singer Plans to Focus on Relationship, Write 'Happy Record'
Jennifer Hudson Whitney Tribute: Grammy President Reveals Why Singer Was Chosen for Musical Memorial
Grammy 2012 Winners' List: Adele Sweeps Music's Biggest Night
3 Economic Misconceptions That Need to Die
5-Hour Energy: A Success Equal Parts Caffeine, Chemistry and Meditation
People With Easy-To-Pronounce Names More Likely To Succeed, Study Says
Katy Perry Grammy Performance 2012: Did the Diva Diss Her Ex-Hubby With Revealing New Song?
Whitney Houston Dead: Stars React to Legend's Sudden Death














Comments
1
Subscribe to commentsMichaelJun 24th 2009 9:59AM
I don't think this makes sense from a residential/community standpoint, but I can think of at least three areas where setting this up would be beneficial or (at least) not detrimental
1) Near already built industrial areas (anything with a smoke stack sending out large volume CO2 amounts)
2) Near already existing community utility areas (waste water treatment plants, integrated into water towers, electrical stations)
3) Near major commerce outlets with high traffic patterns (attach one to every mall in America for a tax break)