<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Switched - Comments for Conceptual 'Story' Takes 1,000 Years to Read</title>
<link>http://www.switched.com/2009/06/19/conceptual-story-takes-1-000-years-to-read/</link>
<description>Switched Comments for Conceptual 'Story' Takes 1,000 Years to Read</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Conceptual 'Story' Takes 1,000 Years to Read]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/06/19/conceptual-story-takes-1-000-years-to-read/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/06/19/conceptual-story-takes-1-000-years-to-read/</guid><description><![CDATA[spoiler alert!<br><br>it reads :"Was it really worth it? I don't think so"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[mere]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 19th 2009 5:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Conceptual 'Story' Takes 1,000 Years to Read]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/06/19/conceptual-story-takes-1-000-years-to-read/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/06/19/conceptual-story-takes-1-000-years-to-read/</guid><description><![CDATA[More like:<br><br>"You just wasted 1,000 years on this stupid book"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Justin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 19th 2009 6:02PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Conceptual 'Story' Takes 1,000 Years to Read]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/06/19/conceptual-story-takes-1-000-years-to-read/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/06/19/conceptual-story-takes-1-000-years-to-read/</guid><description><![CDATA[Of all the worthless, pretentious, CRAP I have ever heard of, this has to be it. This guy is no writer, nor any other kind of artist, unless you include scam and con artist. What a monuental waste o time and publishing space.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[dickn2000b]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 19th 2009 8:57PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Conceptual 'Story' Takes 1,000 Years to Read]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/06/19/conceptual-story-takes-1-000-years-to-read/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/06/19/conceptual-story-takes-1-000-years-to-read/</guid><description><![CDATA[keats is not a con artist. ive read many stories and essays he has written. i had to write an essay about an essay of his in literature class. he was one of the only authors i liked. i think it is creative. the point is that we dont appreciate text. it is so easy to find and read because of the digital era. keats is a great author who wants his work, along with others, to be appreciated and not simply skimmed over quickly somewhere on the web.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[cptierney6]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 19th 2009 11:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Conceptual 'Story' Takes 1,000 Years to Read]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/06/19/conceptual-story-takes-1-000-years-to-read/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/06/19/conceptual-story-takes-1-000-years-to-read/</guid><description><![CDATA[Probaby:<br>      "You have been punked! I can't believe it worked."]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[fryboympd1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 19th 2009 8:44PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Conceptual 'Story' Takes 1,000 Years to Read]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/06/19/conceptual-story-takes-1-000-years-to-read/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/06/19/conceptual-story-takes-1-000-years-to-read/</guid><description><![CDATA[I can't believe that some people take the time to do stuff like this!  Get a life, man! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kirsten]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 19th 2009 9:16PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Conceptual 'Story' Takes 1,000 Years to Read]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/06/19/conceptual-story-takes-1-000-years-to-read/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/06/19/conceptual-story-takes-1-000-years-to-read/</guid><description><![CDATA[Kirsten,<br><br>That's the point the author was trying to make. Take... some... time... to... really... read... something...  Ponder it a bit, relax in the moment, stop wishing time away hurring from one thing to another. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tmhartline]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 19th 2009 9:26PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Conceptual 'Story' Takes 1,000 Years to Read]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/06/19/conceptual-story-takes-1-000-years-to-read/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/06/19/conceptual-story-takes-1-000-years-to-read/</guid><description><![CDATA[Really? How many magazine covers have you done? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Todd Zuniga]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 22nd 2009 3:50PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Conceptual 'Story' Takes 1,000 Years to Read]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/06/19/conceptual-story-takes-1-000-years-to-read/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/06/19/conceptual-story-takes-1-000-years-to-read/</guid><description><![CDATA[Welcome to the world of so-called modern art: pretentious as hell and utterly vapid. Who are the only people who take these frauds seriously? Yep, other so-called  "arteests"  and (relatively speaking) a handful of gallery owners and collectors...most of them engaged in sodomy when not buying, selling, or trying to maintain the value of this crap.<br><br>If you think this so-called conceptual  art is ridiculous, check out anything by Hans Bellmer. Hans hated women. He hated his father. He expressed his hatred with his "art."  After WWII, he spent most of his time making erotic drawings, etchings, sexually explicit photographs, paintings and prints of pubescent girls. This was his sexual excitement. Eichmann used his orders as an excuse to help murder his fellow jews; Bellmer used the fascist culture to explain his "unconventional" art. If Mengele could have defended his actions as an art form, who knows where he'd be in today's pantheon? Hans was a pornographer ahead of his time and, naturally, he's very admired by our cognoscenti.<br><br>The last time I looked, there was an ink tinted close-up photo of a woman's vagina for sale through a gallery in Greenwich, CT: only $1,800,000.00 USD. And the real shame is that there is probably an idiot out there ready to buy it. Absolutely pathetic!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[teachem2think]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 19th 2009 9:33PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Conceptual 'Story' Takes 1,000 Years to Read]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/06/19/conceptual-story-takes-1-000-years-to-read/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/06/19/conceptual-story-takes-1-000-years-to-read/</guid><description><![CDATA[couldn't have said it better myself]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lisa]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 19th 2009 9:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Conceptual 'Story' Takes 1,000 Years to Read]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/06/19/conceptual-story-takes-1-000-years-to-read/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/06/19/conceptual-story-takes-1-000-years-to-read/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree with people thinking it is art and secondly, the ridiculous pricetag on it.<br>Last year I went to the Guggenheim.  Paid the $12 to get in.  Well, they were showing a few Picasso pieces you never heard of and the rest was all James Dine.  Shoes on the floor, a hatchet in the wall, one Christmas ornament.....It was CRAP!  I went downstairs and got my money back. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 19th 2009 11:07PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Conceptual 'Story' Takes 1,000 Years to Read]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/06/19/conceptual-story-takes-1-000-years-to-read/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/06/19/conceptual-story-takes-1-000-years-to-read/</guid><description><![CDATA[Who cares?And Who has that much free time to think of this crap?Oh and Why waste your time writing this story?Im still trying to figure out how to get the couple minutes back I lost reading this worthless story.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[jeffmcnair1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 19th 2009 9:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Conceptual 'Story' Takes 1,000 Years to Read]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/06/19/conceptual-story-takes-1-000-years-to-read/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/06/19/conceptual-story-takes-1-000-years-to-read/</guid><description><![CDATA[I am a pretty fast reader, I would bet that is could read it in 333 years.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[wIL]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 19th 2009 10:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Conceptual 'Story' Takes 1,000 Years to Read]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/06/19/conceptual-story-takes-1-000-years-to-read/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/06/19/conceptual-story-takes-1-000-years-to-read/</guid><description><![CDATA[Chuck Norris has already finished the "Story"]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[tob1957]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 19th 2009 10:24PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Conceptual 'Story' Takes 1,000 Years to Read]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/06/19/conceptual-story-takes-1-000-years-to-read/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/06/19/conceptual-story-takes-1-000-years-to-read/</guid><description><![CDATA[A couple of issues I have with this article and the comments about said article:<br><br>The author Leila Brillson writes, "The story being a mere nine words long (come on, is that really a story?)" and to that I would have to remind everyone of flash fiction. A story can be told in one sentence. Look at Amy Hempel; she is well known for her short fiction, some only one sentence long. However, in asking this question to the readers Brillson is doing something that the artist Johnathon Keats is doing: we as readers are invited to questions and comment. We are asked to participate, rather than remain passive readers. I may disagree with Brillson's notion that a story can't be nine words, but I applaud her for her statement because it makes me a better reader and it makes me form my own opinions; in the end, her article is smart and inviting.  Keats is doing the same thing; whether you like his piece or not, you will talk about it and form your own opinions on it, which is the purpose of art. Art makes a person think and discuss. It's not a waste of time because we are learning something new. I have the issue of opium and the reason I bought it was not the cover but the stories inside; the idea of time. When I actually looked at the cover I was surprised and intrigued. Sad that it would take so long. I wondered if I could decipher what it said. I also wondered if I could write a story in nine words. <br><br>Everyone's comments are valid and I think that Keats' work has been fruitful even here because nine (and now ten) comments have been posted already. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[lunabrava87]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 19th 2009 10:36PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Conceptual 'Story' Takes 1,000 Years to Read]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/06/19/conceptual-story-takes-1-000-years-to-read/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/06/19/conceptual-story-takes-1-000-years-to-read/</guid><description><![CDATA[Bravo]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[scott]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 19th 2009 11:35PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Conceptual 'Story' Takes 1,000 Years to Read]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/06/19/conceptual-story-takes-1-000-years-to-read/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/06/19/conceptual-story-takes-1-000-years-to-read/</guid><description><![CDATA[i hope one of the words isn't "butler."]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 19th 2009 10:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Conceptual 'Story' Takes 1,000 Years to Read]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/06/19/conceptual-story-takes-1-000-years-to-read/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/06/19/conceptual-story-takes-1-000-years-to-read/</guid><description><![CDATA[I already did my 1,000 years waiting for the end of the Harry Potter series.  Well, it felt like a thousand.  Same with A Series of Unfortunate Events.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[missimin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 19th 2009 10:43PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Conceptual 'Story' Takes 1,000 Years to Read]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/06/19/conceptual-story-takes-1-000-years-to-read/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/06/19/conceptual-story-takes-1-000-years-to-read/</guid><description><![CDATA[Harry Potter: What a useless piece of work that was.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[john]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 20th 2009 12:00AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Conceptual 'Story' Takes 1,000 Years to Read]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/06/19/conceptual-story-takes-1-000-years-to-read/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/06/19/conceptual-story-takes-1-000-years-to-read/</guid><description><![CDATA[Now you can start on "Twilight". ;-)]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[eahoff34]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jun 20th 2009 4:33AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
