14-Year-Old Discovers Rare Supernova
If nine-year-olds can work for Microsoft and become feared professional gamers, why can't a 14-year-old leave her mark on the world of astronomy? Oh, wait, she can -- as proven by Caroline Moore, a student from upstate New York who discovered an exploding star that occurred in a galaxy roughly 70 million light years away.
All the way back in November, Caroline spotted the faint glow in the sky with nothing more than a low-powered telescope. Word got out and after months of monitoring at some of the most advanced installations in the world, astronomers decided that the explosion was a curiously small supernova.
This particular example was of special note because it was much less powerful than your normal supernova -- if you can call gigantic stars exploding with so much energy that their light can outshine entire galaxies "normal." Indeed, scientists believe that the explosion Caroline detected could be the weakest supernova ever recorded. Astrophysicists like Ryan Foley of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics have speculated that this particular instance was an explosion that failed, perhaps only partially destroying the star. Still, the object was labeled 'SN 2008ha,' technically classing it a supernova.
"Coincidentally, the youngest person to ever discover a supernova found one of the most peculiar and interesting supernovae ever," Alex Filippenko, leader of the University of California, Berkeley supernova group, told the Space Fellowship. "This shows that no matter what your age, anyone can make a significant contribution to our understanding of the Universe."
Caroline is just the latest in a long line of amateur astronomers who have made important contributions to the understanding of our universe. Check out the gallery below for a few more ordinary people who made extraordinary discoveries. [From: Space Fellowship]
The 5 Greatest Planet-Exploring Robots
If its mission succeeds in 2012, NASA's latest Mars rover, the newly christened Curiosity will join an elite group of robots that have managed to touch down safely on an alien world. Click through to see Curiosity's five greatest forbearers.
Luna 9
Two and a half years before Neil Armstrong's giant leap, the Soviets' unmanned Luna 9 probe touched down on the surface of the Moon on February 3, 1966. For three days, it beamed back the first videos and panoramic photos from a heavenly body.
Venera 7
On August 17, 1970, the Soviet Venera 7 probe crash-landed on Venus and became the first spacecraft to survey our nearest planetary neighbor. What it found wasn't pretty: A hellish world with metal-melting temperatures of 475 degrees Fahrenheit and crushing atmospheric pressure 93 times greater than Earth's.
Viking 1 and 2
After three attempts by the USSR, NASA succeeded in landing the first robot on Mars when Viking 1 touched down on July 20, 1976. (Its sibling, Viking 2, landed on September 3.) Although designed for a 90-day mission, the landers spent over 6 years surveying the planet.
NEAR Shoemaker
On February 14 , 2000, Shoemaker locked into orbit around 433 Eros, an asteroid orbiting just past Mars. Though Shoemaker wasn't designed to land on Eros, NASA engineers successfully plunked it down on the rock after its one-year mission.
Huygens Saturn Probe
A joint American-European mission touched-down a probe called Huygens on the surface of Saturn's largest moon, Titan, on January 14, 2005. Nearly half the size of Earth, Titan is the only moon in the solar system with an atmosphere -- which allowed Huygens to make a leisurely two-and-a-half-hour parachute descent while measuring the atmosphere and snapping photos of the terrain. It continued to send back data for an hour and ten minutes after it landed.






Disney World Scammers Scored Four Years of Free Vacations
Stranger's Kiss Keeps 16-Year-Old From Committing Suicide
Rookie Cop Reportedly Berated, Called 'A Rat' For Arresting Off-Duty Officer
Walmart Ending Membership in Conservative Group
How I Went Bankrupt at 23
Can a New Guy Save Best Buy?
Woman Claims Kangaroo Stalked Her for 2 Days, Then Attacked
Pete Cosey Dead: Chicago Guitar Great and Miles Davis Collaborator Dies at 68
Facebook, Week Two: Fortunes Made and Fortunes Lost (Mostly Lost)
Michael Grant Dead: Crescent Shield Singer Dies Aged 39














Comments
36
Subscribe to commentsriprogJun 17th 2009 7:10PM
Shuttle Launch? How about a shuttle trip!!!!
shadetreedogJun 17th 2009 7:36PM
GOOD FOR HER !
jbjg24mJun 17th 2009 7:39PM
GOOD !
MarkJun 17th 2009 7:42PM
just keep her away from david letterman
jamesjmt01Jun 17th 2009 7:45PM
Happy For You
Jim
ShyinarizonaJun 18th 2009 8:29AM
You go Caroline!! Good job girlie!
KimlaJun 18th 2009 8:51AM
They could have named it after her - SN Jessica2008........
Bastet1970Jun 18th 2009 9:26AM
Good for her. Too many times the works of amateur astronomers is disregarded. Back in the 1960's my Dad made a discovery-he was an independent co-discoverer of the 4 - 5 day rotation of Venus' upper atmosphere. This was scoffed at by many professionals including Carl Sagan himself. Years later it was proven correct and my Dad recieved a congraulatory letter from Mr. Sagan.
af5x5Jun 18th 2009 11:09AM
Good for her!!!! Rock on girl!!!!!
SeanJun 18th 2009 11:11AM
fantastic!
Daniel RosenthalJun 18th 2009 11:58AM
A supernova is, almost by definition, a rare event--in our own galaxy there is
only one about every 200 years. We are due for another, and the most likely
star to explode in such a fashion is Eta Carinae.
There are several ways this can happen.
All supernovae are related to the fact that a star with a mass over a certain
critical value called Chandrashekar's limit, can not become stable white
dwarf stars when their supply of thermonuclear fuel at their core is used up.
A star normally starts out on the main sequence and derives its energy by
fusing hydrogen into helium; when the hydrogen at the core is used up, the
core starts fusing helium into carbon. Meanwile, a layer of hydrogen
adjacent to the core starts fusing into helium, and the star swells up and
becomes a red giant. The star becomes so big and distended it can not
hold onto its outer layers, which drift off into space and become a planetary
nebula. For a star less than 8 solar masses, enough material is lost to get
the mass below Chandrashekar's limit--about 1.38 solar masses; what
remains is the burned out core, a white dwarf. But if the mass exceeds
8 solar masses more and more complex thermonuclear reactions take place
until a core of iron is built up. Iron does not support thermonuclear fusion,
so the core collapses under its own weight--and the rest of the star comes
crashing in after it. The heat generated causes the iron atoms to dissolve
into a "soup" of subatomic particles--but the process is strongly endothermic--
it absorbs energy rather than creating it. The core implodes suddenly, and
the outer layers go crashing in after it. So much heat is now generated that
out of control thermonuclear reactions take place in the outer layers, and the
star blows itself to pieces--except for the core, which collapses into a solid
mass of neutrons. The outer layers of the star form a rapidly expanding shell
of gas outside the burned out core.
A supernova can also take place when a white dwarf in a close binary system
whose mass is JUST UNDER Chandrashekar's limit accretes enough material
from a companion star that is starting to evolve into a red giant to push its mass
"over the brink". The white dwarf begins to collapse and the heat thus generated
rekindles thermonuclear reactions at the center of the star which drives up the
temperature still further. However since the matter at the center of the star is
in a "degenerate" state it does not obey the ideal gas law and does not expand
and lower its temperature. Instead, it continues to shrink, and the thermonuclear
reactions at the center become more and more violent until they tear the star
apart. This type of supernova does not leave behind a solid core of neutrons;
only the expanding shell of gas.
blueyedtgrrJun 18th 2009 12:49PM
Now THIS right here is a story I like to hear about. Not a girl winning a texting competition or the word f*ck on a yearbook. This is cool. :)
taynfiasgmaJun 18th 2009 1:00PM
And if we hadn't aborted 1/3 of the gen-xers just think of where we could be by now. Half of them were females. And most of them because they were "inconvenient".
TimothyJun 18th 2009 1:12PM
Congrats to this young lady. Just goes to show that young people can do anything they set their mind to. Keep up the good work young lady!!!!!
lfg122570Jun 18th 2009 1:39PM
bush blew up the star "aint" that right democrats! remember how he made that "MAN-MADE DISASTER KATRINA". thank god obama the super-hero is here to save us from the super-villian bush.( as seen through democrats eyes
abrazoybesitoJun 18th 2009 2:00PM
BRAVO to her...here's hoping more of the skies open up for her~