'Sexting' Is the New 'Spin the Bottle,' Argues Canadian Professor
The practice of sexting is all over the news right now as more and more teens are getting caught sending provocative images to each other via cell phone messages. In a few cases, some of these teens are even being punished as child pornographers and being forced to register as sex offenders. One professor thinks that the scandal is being blown out of proportion, and frankly, we agree with him.According to the National Post, Professor Peter Cumming from York University in Toronto stated in a recent paper that, while sexting itself may be a relatively new phenomenon, the ideas behind it are really no different than those behind playing 'doctor' or 'spin the bottle.' In thepaper, he writes:
"Technology does change things, and there can be very serious consequences. But that obscures the fact that children and young people are sexual beings who have explored their sexuality in all times, and all cultures and all places. A distinction has to be made between nudity and child porn."The problem, of course, arises when someone forwards those explicit images and, intentionally or not, spreads them around the Internet. Clearly, this is a problem that must be addressed. But how to do so without unfairly punishing kids remains to be determined. [From: National Post]
Teen Texting Craziness
Syracuse University professor Laurence Thomas made news last year for walking out of the classroom whenever his students disobeyed his "no texting in class" rule. Wouldn't the kind of student who would text in class be happy to have class canceled?
In January, 13-year-old Californian Reina Hardesty sent 14,528 text messages from her cell phone. Fortunately for her daddy, he had her on an unlimited text plan.
Two high school cheerleaders in Seattle were suspended from school in December when school officials found out that they had taken nude pictures of themselves on their cell phones and, mistakenly or not, wound up with them circulating through the football locker room. The girls' parents have filed suit against the school. You'd think they would just let the embarassment die quietly.
In December, while on a class trip (according to an Internet rumor anyway), the above message appeared on 18-year-old Elizabeth Frisinger's phone after mistakenly texting her dad, back home in Cleveland, that she'd just lost her virginity. Whoops!
Outdoing Reina Hardesty, 15-year-old Ohioan Paige Hornev averages 15,000 text messages a month. That comes out to the impressive, or pitiful, average of 500 text messages a day.
Thinking about Emily Jenning's texting abilities just makes our thumbs hurt. The Vancouver, British Columbia teen pumped out an absurd 41,600 text messages in the course of a single month -- we did some quick calculations and that works out to about one text every minute.





Disney World Scammers Scored Four Years of Free Vacations
Stranger's Kiss Keeps 16-Year-Old From Committing Suicide
Rookie Cop Reportedly Berated, Called 'A Rat' For Arresting Off-Duty Officer
Walmart Ending Membership in Conservative Group
How I Went Bankrupt at 23
Can a New Guy Save Best Buy?
Woman Claims Kangaroo Stalked Her for 2 Days, Then Attacked
Pete Cosey Dead: Chicago Guitar Great and Miles Davis Collaborator Dies at 68
Facebook, Week Two: Fortunes Made and Fortunes Lost (Mostly Lost)
Michael Grant Dead: Crescent Shield Singer Dies Aged 39














Comments
59
Subscribe to commentsITVENDINGJun 1st 2009 2:04PM
IMAGINE THIS LAME BRAIN MAY BE YOUR KIDS TEACHER SOME DAY....I WONDER IF IT WOULD SEEM O.K. IF IT WAS HIS DAUGHTER DOING IT....
bluefireryuJun 1st 2009 4:14PM
Why does it have to be a girl? Guys are not so innocent either and for all you know this person could have a son and or daughter. You shouldn't necessarily judge based on assumptions.
ChazJun 1st 2009 2:14PM
How many kids does this guy have?
ChazJun 1st 2009 2:17PM
Hey Professor Moron,your supposed to help kids,what are you a pervert?
lhoward914Jun 1st 2009 2:20PM
Hmmm.... Professor Peter Cumming is an "Expert" according to this author. An expert in what? This guy is an english teacher at a college.
Here is the essence of his resume' -In addition to his work as an actor, director, and educator, Peter Cumming is also a writer who has produced stage plays, nonfiction, and several books for children. Along with his work in theater, Cumming has also written two picture books.
Helluva so called "expert".
TerriJun 1st 2009 3:19PM
Um ya and people just LOOK AT HIS NAME!?!?!?! If that is not a porn name then I'm Marilyn Chambers. Seriously.
jimJun 1st 2009 2:21PM
So a English teacher who didn't even interview anyone and just read news reports about count 'em 4 CASES says it's ok and you jump on board with him...Interesting........No wonder Time Warner wants out......Better get those customer service people ready to keep people on the phone for 45 minutes again.....You really wanna get on board with this guy....News reports about 4 cases
KARE WJun 1st 2009 2:26PM
PARENTS WON'T PUNISH KIDS FOR BEING OUT OF CONTROL, UNDOUBTEDLY THEY DON'T EVEN KNOW ABOUT IT. SO LET THE LAW HANDLE IT BEFORE THE KIDS' PICTURES WIND UP ON PORN SITES. THERE IS NO CONTAINMENT ANYMORE BY PARENTS. KIDS NEED CENSORING.
Erik MoweryJun 1st 2009 2:27PM
Wake up people! Look behind the the curtian! Do yourself a favor. Stop watching tv, Listening to the radio, etc., Then, re evaluate what is important! Morals, etc., You are being brainwashed. How you should look, what you need, what is acceptable! Read this article and THINK!!!!
emailstewartJun 1st 2009 2:28PM
hey SWITCHED! you are SUCH A BUNCH OF IDIOTS!!!!! WHAT is so "HARMLESS" about teenagers playing doctor, which in itself is a WORLD of difference from spin the bottle!? youre STARTING with a false premise, and think just because we all did it, it was ok. CHILD MOLESTORS MEET IN CHAT ROOMS AND REACH THE SAME CONCLUSION. these same "EXPERTS" and duhhh "frankly," YOU, come from broken homes, use prescription drugs as a way of life, and think the solution to teenage pregnancy is "harmless" abortion, (when mothers who aborted their babies is one of the highest suicide rates for any "medical procedure,," and probably also classify suicide as population control/survival of the fittest. along with THIS bunk, they'll reap their reward soon, along with everyone else who takes their "sound advice." PARENTS: TAKE THE TIME TO TEACH YOUR KIDS TO LOVE THEIR PRIVACY AND THEIR BODIES AND THEIR FUTURE FAMILY, SO THEY CAN SHARE THAT LOVE WITH THE KIDS WHOS PARENTS ARE TOO STUPID OR IRRESPONSIBLE TO TAKE THE TIME TO TEACH THEM FIRST. I am SO relieved to see similar comments. and yes, it would certainly be intesting to see his demented perverted reaction when his 13 yr old daughter reads this, or when he catches her sexting
crn1964Jun 1st 2009 2:31PM
This "profesor " has written books for children ? What a laugh!!!! Some kind of expert.
Jeff TrenkleJun 1st 2009 3:13PM
I have never been a fan of lines in the sand drawn at 18 and 21 years old. For instance, a 21 year old in the height of the egos get introduced to alcohol for the first time {assuming the law is followed} and this rule is in the name of public safety? I had friends die in high school due to drunk driving, not because they wanted to be driving, but had no safe place to drink.
'Sexting' is producing child pornography according to the law and a double standard should not exist.
Parents generally purchase the phones and pay for the air time and should be held accountable as well as accomplices. How can you hold and punish one citizen for a crime and let others simply slide?
AnonymouseJun 1st 2009 2:37PM
Lol... Professor Cumming....
Moe-MoeJun 1st 2009 2:38PM
I dont understand why everyone is so upset about this article. I guess I will be the only one who agrees that 'sexting' is no big deal. If a child wants to take pictures of themselves and send them via text message, let them deal with the consequence. But to register as a sex offender? That is a little much. Let them learn why its not right to do it on their own. If the pics end up on the interent, that should be the consequence. Let kids learn on their own, why does everyone need such control of them. They will just rebel worse in the future.
Paul HarrisJun 1st 2009 2:48PM
I have neither the time nor the inclination to teach you morons the truth about our atitudes about all things sexual. Needless to say, the subject is extremely complicated and filled with inacuracies galore. It begins with the creation story, blaming women for all the worlds evil, remember Pandora's box? Society has always been afraid of the power of sexual attraction. By always I mean since the begining of time! Fortunately God or nature, whichever you prefer, made the sex drive among the most powerful inherant drives in humanity. If not, we'd have become extinct thousands of years ago from our own stupitity.
bluefireryuJun 1st 2009 4:14PM
I mostly agree with Mr. Harris but i personally think that the only reason we condemn sex is because its is done with out marriage.I somewhat doubt anyone has gotten angry at someone for having sex when they are married.
To comment on the article I just think that there is a specific role of the parent. This role is not to think badly of their child but it is to guide them so that they make the right choices in life. If a parent can guide their children and teach them what to and what to not do then i think they are successful in being a parent.Truthfully if we all think about it a son/daughter that holds their own is considered successful not the person that needs a parents advice every time there is a choice to be made.
I think labeling children as sex offenders is a bit extreme but i also think it is important to teach them that that is not the right thing to do because it could cause problems for them in the future.
loates501Jun 1st 2009 2:48PM
I agree with the professor. I think we are being way too harsh. I have a 10 year old daughter and would be mortified if she ended up sexting, but to have her register as a sex offender? That is a little much. Monitor your children and teach them the right things. Punish them at home if need be. This should not be a matter of state unless it is a clear cut case of an adult taking advantage of a child. Have you forgotten how your hormones raged when you were a teen????
PCJun 1st 2009 2:53PM
This is NOT like spin-the-bottle. As I recall, that game was played with your clothes on, and in front of others to control just how far people went! Doctor and Post Office went further, but there was still peer pressure to refrain from nudity.
Nudity has a time and a place. Minors on cellphones have no business engaging in this activity, period. When you have minor girls texting their nude photos to boys with the message "this is what you're missing" they have then crossed the line from experimentation to prostitution.
djchrisco7Jun 1st 2009 3:48PM
prostitution requires money though...
BenJun 1st 2009 3:01PM
I think sexting is wrong but I don't think teens shouldn't be charged with crimes or have to sign up for being sex offenders. Thats what some of posters don't get and the professor is wrong. I think parents need to tell there teens that you shouldn't post reavling pics or you could get in trouble I would pusnish my teen if they ever do it and I fine out about it but DA's shouldn't be pressing charges on Teens if they do sexting that should be up to the parents. Erik Mowery you are dead wrong telling people to stop watching TV & radio I have never seen the media ever say how to look what you should buy as you have claim which is a lie Erik. And you have no life and are a loser.