EMT Posts Murder Victim Photo on Facebook, Gets Fired
On the list of stupid things to post to Facebook, photos from a murder scene have to be right up there at the top. Apparently, this never occurred to Mark Musarella, a now-former emergency medical technician (EMT) at Richmond University Medical Center in Staten Island, New York.
While on EMT duty on March 30, the 46-year-old retired police officer was called to a murder in the West Brighton area of New York's forgotten borough. According to Fire Chief, while he was on the scene, he snapped a few pics of the 26-year-old victim, Caroline Wimmer, lying dead on the floor of her apartment with the cord of a hairdryer wrapped around her throat. For some inexplicable reason, Musarella turned right around and posted the images on his Facebook page -- as expected, he was swiftly fired by the hospital and the NYPD was notified.
What's worse, one source told the Staten Island Advance that Musarella may not have even learned his lesson: Although the murder scene picture has been taken down, someone with access to his profile told the newspaper that Musarella's Facebook page still had a photo from a car crash he may have responded to.
If you have to be told that posting photos of a murder scene is inappropriate, then something is clearly wrong. [From: SI Live, via: Fire Chief]
Facebook Crime and Punishment
Blackmail
Sending any personal info or incriminating pictures to someone on Facebook is a huge mistake for many reasons. One of the worst possible outcomes is getting blackmailed for money, sex, or, well, anything these sickos dream up. Really, whether they're using a fake profile or not, it's a horrible idea. Read up on the story of an 18-year-old who blackmailed 31 male classmates after he posed as a girl and asked for nude pictures. That's lesson enough.
Impostors
Sure, it can be harmless to impersonate a celeb online or create a fake profile for a movie character. But seriously, there's a definite line you shouldn't cross when pretending to be someone else and it can lead to dire consequences for you. Maybe it's not as extreme as the Moroccan man who was jailed for 43 days after creating a fake Facebook profile of a prince, but you never know. Just steer clear of it.
Self-Incrimination
Do we really have to explain this? Just look up the shoplifter who posed with her stolen merchandise, the many photos of drunk underage teens, and, most recently, the album featuring a couple who killed and ate an endangered iguana in the Bahamas.
Suicide
Social networking sites has been blamed for a lot of things, fairly and unfairly, but in our opinion, the worst offense has been their indirect involvement in suicides. Obviously, there are a lot of factors responsible in each case, but there does seem to be links between social networking and a rash of suicides, and obviously tehre's the case tragic of Megan Meier, who killed herself after a classmate's mom impersonated a teen boy and harassed her over Myspace.
Murder
We've reported on numerous incidents of people getting in trouble because of their online behavior. Now, people are becoming victims because of what they're doing on the Web too. In England, a man was convicted of murdering his estranged wife after she changed her relationship status to "single." So, be careful of who can see your profile and what you're doing, no matter how harmless it seems.
Nigerian Scammers
Oh, you thought this only happened via poorly worded emails, right? WRONG. Once people got wise to their old ways, these con men are turning to social networking sites for new targets. This time, they're hacking into people's accounts and impersonating them to ask for money, usually with some weird sob story. You can check out a transcript of one of these conversations here.
Cooperation
Even if the law isn't on a case, a victim, his friends, or empathetic strangers might be. Since it's easy to get word out for anything online, people are using blogs, forums, and social networking sites to help track down criminals. In one such case, a vehicle thief was tracked down by a bunch of anonymous car enthusiasts after the victim posted his story on a forum. In the end, they identified the guy through his Facebook profile.
Self-Incrimination
Do we really have to explain this? Just look up the shoplifter who posed with her stolen merchandise, the many photos of drunk underage teens, and, most recently, the album featuring a couple who killed and ate an endangered iguana in the Bahamas.






Disney World Scammers Scored Four Years of Free Vacations
Stranger's Kiss Keeps 16-Year-Old From Committing Suicide
Rookie Cop Reportedly Berated, Called 'A Rat' For Arresting Off-Duty Officer
Walmart Ending Membership in Conservative Group
How I Went Bankrupt at 23
Can a New Guy Save Best Buy?
Woman Claims Kangaroo Stalked Her for 2 Days, Then Attacked
Pete Cosey Dead: Chicago Guitar Great and Miles Davis Collaborator Dies at 68
Facebook, Week Two: Fortunes Made and Fortunes Lost (Mostly Lost)
Michael Grant Dead: Crescent Shield Singer Dies Aged 39














Comments
92
Subscribe to commentsdsmith8463May 26th 2009 9:37AM
krboy67,
Ummm, I think the post was a joke.
The Real TruthMay 25th 2009 7:24PM
Sue the bastard!! Sue him into oblivion!!! Sue the EMT service!! They should have had rules that would prohibit anything like this act. Sue the Municipality for not having these rules in place to then assign to the EMT service who would then compel the staff to not do this type of act. Sue the State, who should have had a rule that would have been assigned to the Municipality who contracted the EMT service who would then compel the staff to not do this type of act. Sue the Federal governement who didn't have the rule in place for the State...
Sue. Sue. Sue. Sue them alllllllllllllllllllllll -- then throw his sorry ass into jail for something that deals with public alarm - or something. And go back and look at his so called "police life" and see all of the crap that he did then sue the Department....
NoahJun 6th 2009 4:32PM
You're missing something. In order to sue someone, you need to establish damages. Taking a photo of a dead guy and posting it on the internet is simply an excercise of freedom of speech. A judge would never award damages, because there are none that can be substantiated.
Sue JohnsonMay 25th 2009 7:31PM
What's the difference in what he did and what the CHP did to Nikki Katsouras' family by posting pics on the web of her nearly decapitated body hanging upside down after a horrible car accident? They didn't get fired. It was stated that what they did wasn't illegal. Someone even copied the picture and cruely and viciously emailed it to her father! I agree the EMT should have been fired..but why not the CHP officers?
NoahJun 6th 2009 4:42PM
Sue,
Nikki had an accident in public, and anyone - including the police officer, has the right to take photos of her in public. Look up what's included in the First Amendment, and the laws regarding photography. The Freedom of Speech laws that protect the police officer who took those photos are the same laws that allow you to voice your opinions without fear of prosecution.
Cheers.
Patricia ReynertsonJun 7th 2009 12:58PM
They should be fired, too.
George HawkesMay 25th 2009 7:40PM
Hell AOL should post the pictures with this story. Its time for a Facebook type site to let anything be posted EXCEPT child Pixs.
The way it is now if someone does not like something and they start yelling its
removed. If you don't like it feel free to turn your computer off.
Its a shame Facebook gives in so easy.
DaveMay 25th 2009 8:16PM
Hi kids!!!......todays word is "Mark Musarella"......can you say "Stupid A$$hole"?.....I knew you could!
NoahJun 6th 2009 4:20PM
You guys are jumping to all sorts of conclusions, not knowing or understanding a thing about the First Amendment. This guy has not violated any laws. There is NO law that says you can't take a picture of a dead guy, car accident, accident victim, etc. Photography is protected 100% by the First Amendment. It may not protect is job, but that is an entirely different matter.
He is 100% protected by freedom of speech. Most of you may disagree with that, but you really can't do a thing about it. As a photographer, I've found most people don't understand the laws that protect all of us. Most people think that there has to be some sort of release signed in order to take their or their children's photo. If there is no expectation of privacy, IE. photos taken in a public place where you have no privacy, ANYONE with a camera is free to take a photo of you - or your kids. Dead or alive. If you're all so paranoid that you can't fathom the thought of that, why don't you take a tip from Michael Jackson and sport a surgical mask and umbrella?
Patricia ReynertsonJun 7th 2009 1:00PM
He is not a photographer- he is an EMT worker. The difference is in access. As an EMT worker he is CALLED to the scene to HELP the VICTIMS- not exploit them.
NoahJun 7th 2009 3:57PM
You're arguing semantics. If someone takes a photo of someone / something / anything, they are covered under the same laws that protect photographers. There is really no debating this.
WENDYJun 18th 2009 12:08PM
DOESN'T ANYONE SEE THAT THIS SICK JERK COULD BE IN THE BEGINNING OR WORSE STAGES OF SERIAL KILLINGS? HE ENJOYS THOSE PHOTO'S?!