Switched Archives
June 2012
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
Blackberry 101 | Best Tablets | Best iPhone 4 Case | Color App | Facebook Questions | NCAA Brackets | Lady Gaga at Google | Facebook Deals | Animated GIF | Anonymous | Amazon Appstore | April Fools' Day | Google Blogger | Rebecca Black Friday | Nintendo 3DS | Vimeo iPhone App | Video Game Emulators | Private Browsing | Mark Bao | Julian Assange | What is 4G? | Bronx Zoo Cobra | iPad 2 Review | Google 1 | New York Times Paywall
- Warren Riddle
Listening to Ra, glance at the notes and there's @AliveRecords. Nice cover, Mr. Boissel! @TheGloryFires #magiccityjams http://t.co/uT0M77VJ
- Leila Brillson
I do not want this.
- Joshua Fruhlinger
Misconceptions about LA. Interesting read, but kinda whiney. http://t.co/jEqHw3ts
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
(Unverified)Apr 28th 2009 9:11AM
I do not feel the ad is appropriate. Personally, I do not want to see this type of ad with heterosexual or homosexual content. Facebook is a networking opportunity to connect with friends and family. I do not mind advertisements now and then....however, i see no reason why they have to be sexual in nature. This forces people to see images that may be offensive to them. It should be about respect of ALL people. Why even cross sexual boundaries?