<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Switched - Comments for Half of Microsoft Staff Uses Google Rather Than Live Search</title>
<link>http://www.switched.com/2009/04/14/half-of-microsoft-staff-uses-google-rather-than-live-search/</link>
<description>Switched Comments for Half of Microsoft Staff Uses Google Rather Than Live Search</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Half of Microsoft Staff Uses Google Rather Than Live Search]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/04/14/half-of-microsoft-staff-uses-google-rather-than-live-search/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/04/14/half-of-microsoft-staff-uses-google-rather-than-live-search/</guid><description><![CDATA[Switching away from Google is tough.  Live Search is a really solid engine, but I'm so used to parsing Google results that using anything else feels weird.<br><br>I've been trying to use Live Search more lately, not because I'm devoted to MS but simply because I want to see how the services stack up when it's not just a case of Google winning by familiarity.<br><br>I already prefer Live Search Mobile to Google's offering, but web search is a tougher nut for MS to crack.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[typoink]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 14th 2009 12:40PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
