Tumblr 101: Tips And Tricks To Get Started
Sebastian Thrun: Google's Driverless Car
High-Tech Airport Body Scans Leave Nothing to the Imagination
We all hate airport security checkpoints. We hate the wait, the lines and the fact that we always seem to wear mismatching socks on the day we fly (seriously!). That said, the checkpoints are essential to public safety, and we deal with them accordingly. A controversial scanning technology we reported on last year is taking passenger security to the next level, and, for some people, it is one level too far.Live Science reports that whole-body scanning technology is popping up at airport security checkpoints around the country, and to say that these scanners see everything is an understatement. The new technology can penetrate clothing, allowing Transportation Security Authority (TSA) officials to see the subject's silhouette along with metallic and non-metallic objects.
Two types of body scan technologies have been tested by the TSA. Millimeter wave (MMW) scanning creates a 3-D image of the subject by bouncing it with radio waves. The second, slower type of unit is called a backscatter, which uses X-rays to scan for dangerous or illegal objects.
The issue here is privacy. Both technologies produce a pretty graphic 3-D image of the person being scanned (complete with the outlines of underwear), so we know a lot of people will have reservations about such an invasive procedure. We know for certain that the TSA had better do some darn good background checks on the people operating those machines. Can you imagine if someone was found to be exploiting said images? What a nightmare that would be. [From: Live Science/FOX News]
Related Links:
16 Grammys Looks That Weren't Working
Whitney Houston Autopsy: Cause of Death Determined?
Worst Movie Mistakes: Date Night Edition (PHOTOS)
Whitney Houston, Bobbi Kristina: Late Singer's Daughter Hospitalized
Adele Five-Year Break? Singer Plans to Focus on Relationship, Write 'Happy Record'
PHOTOS: President Obama's Kissing Technique
Jennifer Hudson Whitney Tribute: Grammy President Reveals Why Singer Was Chosen for Musical Memorial
Grammy 2012 Winners' List: Adele Sweeps Music's Biggest Night
How Hattie Lost 300 Pounds: 'I Was Ready To Do Whatever It Took To Survive'
3 Economic Misconceptions That Need to Die
5-Hour Energy: A Success Equal Parts Caffeine, Chemistry and Meditation
Matt Bomer Comes Out As Gay
People With Easy-To-Pronounce Names More Likely To Succeed, Study Says
Katy Perry Grammy Performance 2012: Did the Diva Diss Her Ex-Hubby With Revealing New Song?
Grammy Awards 2012: The Best & Worst Of The Red Carpet!
Whitney Houston Dead: Stars React to Legend's Sudden Death
Photos Of Dead Lacrosse Player's Injured Body Shown To Jury
12 Grammys Stars Who Gave Good Style
The Top 10 Slacker Colleges
15 Funny Valentine's Day Cards
Mystery Disease Kills Thousands
WATCH: 25 Million Tons Of Japan Tsunami Debris Headed Directly Our Way
Oprah Under Fire For Controversial Tweet
PHOTOS: Thank God For Grown-Up Glamour
JUNGLE SURVIVAL: Marines Drink Snake Blood, Eat Insects
Remembering The People's Ballerina
New Clues, Details Emerge In Powell Case
PHOTOS: Model Falls At Dennis Basso Show
PHOTOS: Kate Spends Valentine's Day Solo!
Taylor Swift Does Great Depression Chic
PHOTOS: Beautiful Scars
15 Funny Valentine's Day Quotes
Comments
6
Subscribe to commentsMadMikeApr 7th 2009 9:44AM
I can see where a woman could be "skeptical" of the technology - but looking at the images it produces, I don't see anything that could be offensive or inappropriate. You can't even identify a person from one of these scans and with people shoving all manner of things into orifices to hide them from security, these do more good than harm.
guardedlyoptimisticApr 7th 2009 1:22PM
the "pics" that you are seeing here and at most TSA friendly sites are NOT the actual images that the screeners will see. There are some of the actual images on you-tube and from British sites. They are FAR more revealing than we are being led to believe. CNN did a sample and demonstrated that if people did not want their genitals clearly showing that the only way to hide them was to cover them with a plate of metal. Women will be revealing nipples, pubic hair etc and men will be exposing their penis. The fact that the TSA is being so deceptive initially is what is truly alarming about this whole thing!
MadMikeApr 8th 2009 10:37AM
Do they make a portable version, that looks like a normal pair of sunglasses? (joking).
BrianApr 7th 2009 9:47AM
Do you really care if some security card is going to see your junk while he scans for box cutters.
There is no conspiracy here. Your naked body isn't being broadcast on national television. This is a good security tool.
Stop being so insecure. Males scan males, females scan females. No one cares about your junk but you.
TomApr 12th 2009 3:53PM
Maybe nobody really cares about being seen as if naked on these scanners except for the news "professionals" who are trying to stir up discontent for a story. Fly nude!
sepiriothApr 7th 2009 10:59AM
I fly all the time and have yet to see these. I personaly dont care, Its less evasive to me then a pat down like they STILL do at Heathrow Airport. But I DO think I would have a problem with some punk checking out my lady beyond what they should be... that is where the "privacy" comes in :)