<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Switched - Comments for Idle Computers Cost Companies $2.8 Billion Annually</title>
<link>http://www.switched.com/2009/03/25/idle-computers-cost-companies-2-8-billion-annually/</link>
<description>Switched Comments for Idle Computers Cost Companies $2.8 Billion Annually</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Idle Computers Cost Companies $2.8 Billion Annually]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/03/25/idle-computers-cost-companies-2-8-billion-annually/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/03/25/idle-computers-cost-companies-2-8-billion-annually/</guid><description><![CDATA[What twit works for Microsoft and couldn't be bothered to code an automated shutdown setting into the energy/power saver control panel?  Not in XP, not in Vista.  The Mac has had one since the mid-90s.<br><br>Of course, what twit IT would recommend Microsoft to gently suck any kind of productivity or profit from a firm.  Self-serving job-security-seeking It support staff maybe.  Who else.  Microsoft is such a waste of budget.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[paul]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 29th 2009 6:40PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Idle Computers Cost Companies $2.8 Billion Annually]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/03/25/idle-computers-cost-companies-2-8-billion-annually/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/03/25/idle-computers-cost-companies-2-8-billion-annually/</guid><description><![CDATA[As Paul notes, it should be possible to establish an automated shutdown and, assuming a company has all it's computers connected to each other, to have the intranet set up so that a single employee could come him, turn on one computer, and have every other computer fire up at the same time.<br><br>Though my memory is hazy and the details of the story are long since forgotten, I remember reading some time back about a study of the costs involved in having employees turn off their computers before heading home for the day, costs including (to name but two) lost productivity and employees' salaries.  An automated shutdown would eliminate the first, and having to pay only a single employee to turn on the network the next day virtually eliminates the second, even in quite small organizations.<br><br>I mention that story because purely in terms of direct costs, we have to compare the two -- the costs from leaving computers on versus the costs from shutting them down.  Of course, such a comparison ignores any environmental impacts and costs resulting from those, granted.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mekhong Kurt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 30th 2009 1:49AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Idle Computers Cost Companies $2.8 Billion Annually]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2009/03/25/idle-computers-cost-companies-2-8-billion-annually/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2009/03/25/idle-computers-cost-companies-2-8-billion-annually/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm a firm believer in turning off and unplugging, but I didn't realize that this much electricity and money was wasted.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Laptop Bags]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 31st 2009 3:17AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
