Somehow, Los Angeles Tops EPA's Most Energy-Efficient City List

Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Houston have been named by the EPA as having the most efficient buildings in the U.S., with annual energy savings of $87.2 million, $83.8 million, and $70.6 million, respectively.
While we would love to jump on the bandwagon and slap these three cities on their backs, we have a little bit more sense than that. After all, anybody who has visited Los Angeles and Houston is well aware that these two places aren't exactly "green." They are, however, massive cities, not only in population, but in sheer geographical sprawl, as well. So, of course, each of these cities has more green buildings than Cheyenne, Wyoming, or Hattiesburg, Mississippi, or Lancaster, Pennsylvania. But that's because they have a lot more buildings, in general.
And while some of those buildings may be green, most of them aren't. We're not exactly students of the environment, but we're certainly confident in saying that Cheyenne, Hattiesburg, and Lancaster -- all put together -- have less of a negative environmental impact than Los Angeles alone. [From: USA Today]
Related Links:
- Coen Brothers Call Out Clean Coal
- Shady Plastic Surgeon May Have Used Human Fat to Power SUV
- 'Green' Eco-Gadgets Are Appealing Yet Confusing, Study Says





Whitney Houston Dead: Singer Dies at 48, Body Found in Beverly Hilton Hotel
Whitney Houston Autopsy: Cause of Death Determined?
Whitney Houston, Bobbi Kristina: Late Singer's Daughter Hospitalized
Whitney Houston Dead: Stars React to Legend's Sudden Death
Adele Five-Year Break? Singer Plans to Focus on Relationship, Write 'Happy Record'
Jennifer Hudson Whitney Tribute: Grammy President Reveals Why Singer Was Chosen for Musical Memorial
Grammy 2012 Winners' List: Adele Sweeps Music's Biggest Night
3 Economic Misconceptions That Need to Die
5-Hour Energy: A Success Equal Parts Caffeine, Chemistry and Meditation
People With Easy-To-Pronounce Names More Likely To Succeed, Study Says















Comments
1
Subscribe to commentswakoMar 4th 2009 7:35PM
their smog cloud says otherwise