Facebook Users Up in Arms Over Content Ownership

As do many sites of its ilk, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg stipulated in the original TOS that the site was entitled to use patrons' information or images, so long as their profiles remained on the site. Now, however, through the TOS, the site is laying claim to a "perpetual license," meaning that a dissatisfied -- or, for that matter, deceased -- Facebook user would always have a presence on the site, whether desired or not.
Some users -- like blogger Ed Champion -- have refused to continue their involvement with Facebook, while celebrity blogger (and celebrity, himself) Perez Hilton has called for a boycott. Of course, whether or not Champion and Hilton themselves are involved with the Web site, their old wall postings and images would be involved, remaining on the site for perpetuity.
In the new policy's defense, Zuckerberg wrote in his blog that, without this new stipulation, old messages or images would be lost from a current user's profile as soon as a former user resigned from the site. Although he didn't say so, we could imagine that letting such data escape into the stratosphere could not only be a source of irritation for users, but of legal trouble for the site, itself. Just think: If somebody had sent threatening or blackmailing messages via Facebook, only to later delete their profile (and thus evidence of their offense), where would that leave the victim? Probably, to their detriment, without much grounds for their intimidation case, or, to Facebook's detriment, with a lawsuit against the site in hand. [From: FOXNews]
Losing Face on Facebook
Facebook is going to rewrite the book on standard office excuses, at least for its shortsighted users. Kevin Colvin, an intern at Anglo Irish bank, thought that had an ironclad story when he asked off to attend to a "family emergency." When his boss was alerted to this fresh picture posted to his Facebook profile during his absence, that story lost just a tad of its believability -- unless he was curing Aunt Hattie with his magical powers and a potent hoppy elixir. We're sure that posting the picture seemed like a good idea at the time, Kevin, but you were sadly mistaken. Same goes for that costume.
Students at Glen Ridge High School in New Jersey were shocked and confused when the news trucks rolled up to get the scoop on a set of Facebook photos. Obtained by a nosy parent, the pictures featured underage drinking that led to the suspension of school athletes. Many saw the role of the photos in the punishments as legally questionable, but despite organized protests and other umbrage, many students opted to just take their own racy Facebook pictures down as soon as possible. Live and learn, everyone -- just don't post visual evidence of it happening on your profile.
Even the charmed lives of beauty queens can be dragged through the mud by Facebook photos taken far away from the pageant stage. Miss New Jersey Amy Polumbo discovered this firsthand over the summer when she was the target of a strange "blackmail plot" centered on profile images of her partying and carrying on in a less than royal fashion. She ended up releasing the photos herself, and soon everyone was wondering what the fuss was all about -- from venture capitalists to gossip reporters, Facebook has a tendency to get people riled up.
Thinking about shoplifting some clothing? Here's a tip -- think twice before posting pictures of yourself modeling the hot merchandise on Facebook. Two students at Radford University in Virginia learned this lesson the hard way when a store owner was tipped off and found the incriminating images on Facebook. A stroke of the 'print' button, a trip to the police office, and the bust was complete.
This story -- women who show little discretion in their alcohol consumption and even less when documenting their misadventures on their profiles -- seems to have started the most recent wave of Facebook embarrassments. While it's difficult for many to understand the personal pride and motivation behind such excess, it's even more mind-boggling to know that these exploits are being glorified online for all to see. Mom must be proud, and potential employers are surely beating down the doors.





Live from Google I/O's 2013 opening keynote!
Chili's Waitress Fired Over Facebook Post Insulting 'Stupid Cops'
Save on Spring Cleaning With a New Vacuum -- Savings Experiment
Billboard Music Awards: Worst Dressed (or Most Daring?) From Past Red Carpets
HSBC Plans 14,000 More Job Cuts
Forbidden America: Cold War-Era Map Shows No-Go Zones For Soviet Tourists
BBC Host Paula White Pulled Off Air After Sounding Drunk
Man Takes Dump In Background Of Instructional Workout Video
Tenants: Stench of Death Makes St. Louis Complex 'Unlivable'
Famous Roadside Attractions














Comments
46
Subscribe to commentsB. VarnerFeb 17th 2009 3:17PM
Mr. Bains:
If the purpose of maintaining a user's profile is, as you hypothesize, to avoid deleting "evidence" of an offense, why not simply archive the data but take it offline?
JenFeb 17th 2009 2:36PM
Archive.....really? Gee that's a concept that could solve the whole problem. Mr. Zuckerberg must not have talked to his lawyers before bringing out this idea to piss off his customers and send them running for the hills. But wait - when they are all gone it will still look like they are there. Hmmmm....like a giant website ghost town of imaginary friends.
cindyFeb 17th 2009 2:46PM
i do not care about anything that perez hilton has to say. if you dont like it (facebook) or disagree with it (facebook) dont use use it. i could care less what he has to say. i love facebook. and have never had any trouble, if i did i just wont use it. but i dont care what perez says about anything.
brianFeb 22nd 2009 2:53PM
Cindy, you should be really careful about what you're saying. Not only will you have to get rid of your facebook account, but also the e-mail account you used to create your facebook. And if you've ever posted a phone number or sent it to someone in a message, you'll need to get that switched (telemarketers can call cell phones too, these days). And the gads of junk snailmail this could generate if you've left a mailing address? I'm sure you're very proud of everything you've ever done or said on there, but consider if someone takes pictures of someone you care about drunk, posts it to facebook, and tags the person in the photo. They didn't necessarily do anything at all wrong, but a little clever angling and whoever has access to this data will be able to see that image, what everyone else is saying about them, and deliver a complimentary sample of the latest hangover cure to their doorstep. And what in the Hell does this mean for people using these sites for bad intentions?
UFO654 CAROLEFeb 17th 2009 2:40PM
Big Big Big Business.........owning private information of each individual on their Website........Wowza...so later on if you are up for the Pulitzer..or up for the Nobel prize..here comes all your info you placed on Face Book..........when you were 13.......bummer........
SAY NO.........THAR SHE BLOWS.......WHEN YOU LEAVE THIS SITE...YOU LEAVE IT AND SHOULD BE ABLE TO BRING ALL YOUR INFO WITH YOU NEVER TO BE ARCHIVED OR SEEN AGAIN..
To keep it is only saying...WE THINK WE MAY MAKE A BUCK ON THIS LATER...THE HELL WITH DEALING WITH A HOMICIDE..TOO TOO FARFETCHED.........COME ON MR. ZUCKERMAN...ADMIT IT IS THE BIG BUCK YOU ARE WORRIED ABOUT.........
OCTAVIANFeb 17th 2009 4:10PM
I'M WITH YOU! AND FOR THOSE OF YOU ON HERE THAT SAY YOU DON'T CARE SHOULD NOT BE SO IGNORANT AND LEARN TO RESPECT YOUR PRIVACY. WHETHER YOU'RE ON FACEBOOK TO KEEP IN TOUCH WITH FRIENDS OR AS A NETWORKING TOOL THIS INFORMATION SHOULD NOT BE SHARED WITHOUT CONSENT FROM THE USER . FURTHUR MORE IF YOU ARE STUPID ENOUGH TO POST PRIVATE INFORMATION AND NOT CARE ABOUT IT, I HOPE TO HEAR ABOUT YOU IN THE NEWS SOMEDAY! I WILL BE THE ONE LAUGHING.
dianeelaineFeb 17th 2009 7:59PM
I agree with you but the issue has two sides. If a victim had received threats or bad E-Mails or comments through a site, then the government should be able to hold these bad E-Mails to help a private citizen who is a victim. I can see that this debate becomes very complicated as there are several sides to this issue. My Thoughts for the Day.
neonwonderFeb 17th 2009 10:32PM
Pulitzer??? LMFAO.
Lets be real..all this wonderful technology as given us the internet..and 90% of it is used for sex/porn/dating/stalking/scamming and commercial purposes. And you are worried about the Pulitzer?
Get a life. No Pulitzer winners here or facebook I assure you.
UFO654 CAROLEFeb 18th 2009 12:00AM
HMMMM Who or what is doing a little censoring?? I did write another note on this site..directly after the one at the top...was there...I saw it..and then with a little swish..it disappeared...Could it be because I made comments about the US FED Govt??? Seems odd it is not there...it was relative to Archived information and the USGovt is good at that.....even when a private citizen is told that certain info is destroyed..only data is collected...but no sir..not the case....all the info one gives to a census taker..no matter what it is...even though you may be told it is destroyed...it is all archived...for what? Well what do you think for what?? To Use!!!..There is a very inoccuous survey used by the Fed Govt...where such innocent questions are asked......about fishing and taking the kids into the woods to look at the birds and the bees...but the end result..sneaking up to the major question..is not if you hunt with a bow........or if you fish in salt water or fresh water......it is DO YOU HUNT WITH A GUN?? OH REALLY?? A RIFLE OR HANDGUN ETC ETC...NOW WHAT DO YOU THINK THE FEDS WANT THAT INFO FOR??? CHECK OUT CHECKOSLOVAKIA......ALL INFO IS ARCHIVED......MAYBE ONE DAY THE FEDS WILL DRAG ALL THAT INFO OUT..AND GUESS WHAT?? YOUR GUN WILL BE GONZO...
There is more to the story on Facebook info being owned than a murder being solved or terrible emails going out...that is bs......there is an underlying reason...has to be........
UFO654 CAROLEFeb 17th 2009 2:48PM
ARCHIVING?? Just recalled something perhaps more important. I worked for some 15 years collecting information for the US FED GOVT relative to the Unemployement that is reported every month...you know...when Wall Street Trembles.......hmmmm lots of info is not true or even made up on the spot.......People do not like being questioned by the US Gov't...But
More to the point..if I am interviewing you..and say you have three children ...We ask for their DOB and their SS Numbers...those wonderful numbers that should be tatooed as they were so many years ago...
and people ask.........honestly...what does Washington do with this info..as it is all VERY PRIVATE........"Oh one says...it is destroyed as the Gov't is only interested in the info on employment!!...Look a little deeper and one quickly finds out..that is not true...ALL INFO IS ARCHIVED BY THE US GOVERNMENT ......FOR WHAT PURPOSE YOU ASK???? GUESS........DO YOU OWN A GUN??? IF YOU EVER GAVE THAT INFO TO A CENSUS TAKER..AND BELIEVE ME THE GOV'T HAS SERITIPTOUS WAYS OF GETTING THAT INFO...GUESS WHERE THAT INFO GOES.........YUP......INTO THE ARCHIVES THAT CAN BE CALLED UP ANY DAY OF ANY MONTH OF ANY YEAR..
YUK TO ARCHIVING...OR PRETENDING YOU WANT THE INFO FOR THE GREATER GOOD.......BS THAT IS WHAT I SAY...BS
frankFeb 17th 2009 2:58PM
Man! I'm glad I'm too paranoid to put stuff on there in the first place. They've been watching me since before there was an internet, and I know they're reading this. Would someone answer that phone!
Matt RobertsFeb 17th 2009 3:11PM
I think all you cry-babies out there are LOOKING for something to get upset about. Who cares what facebook does??? You dont like it, dont use it.
CarlFeb 17th 2009 3:22PM
They are, You don't think Uncle Sam let Microsoft off the hook for nothing do you? The chip ID serial number that MS said they won't let be used. It was either do it or lose the anti-trust case.
TamaraFeb 17th 2009 3:12PM
Doesn't bother me. If you don't want something on the internet forever? It's as simple as not putting it there to begin with.
Ana FloresFeb 17th 2009 3:14PM
What's wrong with being immortalized by Facebook?! LOL.
MikeFeb 17th 2009 3:20PM
Facebook, Myspace and all the other web sites like them are for pathetic losers that spend their time getting fatter in front of a computer rather than spending time with their family and friends, exercising, traveling etc. The people on there are losers anyway, who cares.
Nemo1Feb 17th 2009 5:14PM
Goodness what a diplomat! Who actually cares what you think since this article is of interest to people who DO use facebook etc.? Your little sister did a good job typing for you though, you drooling moron.
Not Mike, for sure!Feb 17th 2009 5:46PM
Mike, you're just mad because you HAVE NO FRIENDS!!! ha ha ha! Your profile (and YES you ARE on there, I've SEEN you!) says Friends: 0... Loser!!
CrissFeb 17th 2009 6:28PM
This is coming from the one who took the time to read this on his computer and actually took the time out to insult people for what he was in fact doing himself?
MikeFeb 17th 2009 6:37PM
I see the truth hurts....go back to watching American Idol while your but gets bigger and your brain gets smaller lol