Top Tech Flops of 2008 2

CNN Hologram
Anyone who watched this year's election coverage on CNN was in for something a bit unexpected: Namely, the "hologram" technology that the network unveiled. According to CNN, it was real "hologram" technology that beamed a CNN correspondent from Chicago to the press center in New York, where Wolf Blitzer could talk to her live and in (holographic) person. Unfortunately, nothing about the tech made logistical sense: Rather than show viewers the scene in Chicago (as would have been the case with a regular video teleconference), the holograms just proved gimmicky, distracting, and awkward -- on one of the biggest nights in the country's history, no less.





Whitney Houston Autopsy: Cause of Death Determined?
Whitney Houston, Bobbi Kristina: Late Singer's Daughter Hospitalized
Adele Five-Year Break? Singer Plans to Focus on Relationship, Write 'Happy Record'
Jennifer Hudson Whitney Tribute: Grammy President Reveals Why Singer Was Chosen for Musical Memorial
Grammy 2012 Winners' List: Adele Sweeps Music's Biggest Night
3 Economic Misconceptions That Need to Die
5-Hour Energy: A Success Equal Parts Caffeine, Chemistry and Meditation
People With Easy-To-Pronounce Names More Likely To Succeed, Study Says
Katy Perry Grammy Performance 2012: Did the Diva Diss Her Ex-Hubby With Revealing New Song?
Whitney Houston Dead: Stars React to Legend's Sudden Death














Comments
21
Subscribe to commentsJonDec 31st 2008 9:22AM
your an idiot this tech form cnn was different and exciting. You must work for Fox news and have the typical right wing bias that all fox stations have
RodneyDec 31st 2008 9:27AM
Jon, The reason no one liked this technology is because we were all watching Fox. And I do not work for Fox.
VolntyrDec 31st 2008 10:16AM
Evan, of course the Hologram technology was gimmicky. It was also the FIRST time something like this has ever been done. Your article is just proving that any numbskull that can write a blog yet have no idea what they are talking about.
solomeeeoDec 31st 2008 10:12AM
CNN is SO yesterdays news!
TimDec 31st 2008 11:18AM
I think it was a great idea!!
The technology is obviously on the ground floor but it beats the heck out of stock photos of the "correspondent/guest" on the phone.
ChriseDec 31st 2008 10:42AM
CNN=sorry, failed, pathetic, trying to be hip Communist News Network. There's a reason they're failing.
JerryDec 31st 2008 10:59AM
The hologram worked fine. CNN didn't hype it. They just used it. CNN got it right.
NickDec 31st 2008 11:04AM
Those holograms were lame. It is just a high-def version of greenscreen video with extra cameras. Since Wolf Blitzer couldn't see the image infront of him it was NOT a hologram. It was simply a video posted overtop of another video that was shot with a greenscreen and multiple cameras. This is not much different than what they have been doing for years with greenscreens, making someone look like they are somewhere that they aren't. If you could actually see the image infront of you and not just on TV, then yes it would be impressive. But since you can ONLY see the image when watching it on TV, it isn't a hologram.
Hardishfo'shizzleyadiggJan 10th 2009 12:55AM
it seems like you're the idiot my friend
JoshDec 31st 2008 11:05AM
ok im sorry... but if anyone really thinks thats a real "hologram", then your a idiot that willing to believe anything on the news... you can clearly tell that was all done by computer. it's not that hard to do
MMDec 31st 2008 12:22PM
Hey, Josh, one rule of thumb. Don't call someone an idiot when you can't even spell or use proper grammar. Kind of blows your argument.
RandyDec 31st 2008 11:20AM
I watch a lot of different channels and I am more disapointed in all of them. CNN had this crap and FOX had super big screen tv's and monitors all over the place. I watch the news to see the news, not to see how much money they can waste on gadgets. Holographic technology is very expensive and has no place in the news room. What a joke. Just another example of Corporate excess. I'll bet the news channel's Exec's are making 30 to 50 million a year and throwing all this money away when all we want is the news.
RexDec 31st 2008 11:37AM
I CAN'T BELIEVE THIS! This is exiting, futuristic and REAL! And some idiot blogs it as poor tech gimmick. Dude, you don’t constantly have to be in opposition just to create controversy. Just admit it, THIS IS THE COOLEST THING YOU HAVE SEEN SO FAR, RIGHT?
sandi and ryanDec 31st 2008 11:48AM
What is wrong with you people. I think that is so cool! It would be very useful perhaps for troops stationed over in Iraq to get to use so their families could get to see them in true form. Think about where this technology will take us! ie: you wouldn't have dvd's today if it weren't for the first Betamax machine.
FredDec 31st 2008 12:29PM
Way to go CNN you have the others networks shaking in thier boots.
Hats off to Your Tech Team. Keep on innovating this is what makes AMERICA STRONG!!!!
Fred
KyleDec 31st 2008 12:41PM
I think that it was a good try but it doesn't look nearly as good as Cisco's version. They actually have the technology to make this work. Maybe CNN should talk to Cisco next time they want to get all fancy with the news. :)
SashaDec 31st 2008 1:09PM
The hologram was awesome! I think election night was the best night to do it. It was a night full of record breaking history! I did some research after watching CNN that night and the information on hologram was really cool. I'm excited to see it used more. What I don't understand is why people in this country are so hatefull and so negative all the time not to mention ,RUDE. The hate surrounding us is just getting worse every day and it's scary. GOD BLESS AMERICA, please!
MikeDec 31st 2008 12:56PM
I used to dislike Fox News because of their apparent right wing leanings. After veiwing all the major networks during the elections, I now have a favorable opinion of Fox News, except for that pufter pansy, Sean Hannity and that god awful bi***, Ann Coulter. I Rather like there offerings of Foxy chicks, especially that gorgeous brunette, Juli Banderas. She keeps my eyes on her thighs - news? What news?
Bart StewartDec 31st 2008 1:36PM
Hmm, I watched CNN for a long time on Election Night and I don't recall seeing these holograms. Oh well, apparently I didn't miss much. By the way, for those of you who said Fox News is beating CNN in ratings, I think you may be a little behind the times. CNN had their best night for ratings ever on Election Night. On any given night Anderson Cooper beats whatever is on Faux, and Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow both beat Bill OReilly most nights. Fox News rose and fell with Bush.
LarryDec 31st 2008 1:41PM
On the contrary I thought the hologram was quite innovative and a peek at the technology that is coming in the future. As it is refined in the future we should be able to speak to one another in a different dimension without leaving a particular location. Like "Full Body" talking to one another on the telephone. I find your article's comments short sited and closed mined. I care less about what CNN reports. I turn the channel often. But How they reported the news via a hologram was truly groundbreaking in the information technology arena. Bravo CNN!!