Russian Businessman Trademarks ;-) Emoticon
Oleg Teterin, a Russian businessman and owner of Superfone (a mobile ad company), has trademarked the wink emoticon, ;-). Teterin says he has no intentions of going after individual users, but that he wants businesses to understand they will not get away with using his trademarked symbol without paying a small licensing fee -- just a few tens of thousands of dollars a year. Teterin even had the gall to claim that the emoticons :-), ;), and :) are similar enough to his newly-trademarked wink that they will also be subject to legal action.
Of course, Teterin is ignoring the widely accepted tale that the emoticon was invented by Scott Fahlman, a Carnegie Mellon professor, who included :-) in an e-mail way back in 1982. We expect that Teterin's claim will crumble as soon as he actually tries to enforce his trademark in front of a judge. [From: SF Gate]





Whitney Houston Dead: Singer Dies at 48, Body Found in Beverly Hilton Hotel
Whitney Houston Autopsy: Cause of Death Determined?
Whitney Houston, Bobbi Kristina: Late Singer's Daughter Hospitalized
Whitney Houston Dead: Stars React to Legend's Sudden Death
Adele Five-Year Break? Singer Plans to Focus on Relationship, Write 'Happy Record'
Jennifer Hudson Whitney Tribute: Grammy President Reveals Why Singer Was Chosen for Musical Memorial
Grammy 2012 Winners' List: Adele Sweeps Music's Biggest Night
3 Economic Misconceptions That Need to Die
5-Hour Energy: A Success Equal Parts Caffeine, Chemistry and Meditation
People With Easy-To-Pronounce Names More Likely To Succeed, Study Says















Comments
4
Subscribe to commentsMikeDec 13th 2008 7:25AM
Please to be kissing my ASCII, and having a nice day :)
JennDec 14th 2008 11:22AM
This dude is nuts! He will be wasting money trying to get it into court, has he been living under a rock??
JennDec 14th 2008 11:25AM
HA HA when I just logged on to retrieve my mail, a ;-) was the waiting icon! Is he going to sue AOL too? Dum@$$
bonerattlesDec 14th 2008 5:12PM
didnt hasbro/parker brothers sue the people who made the game anti-monopoly? and lost, because an american judge ruled hasbro does not have a monopoly on the word monopoly?