Is GPS Lingerie Sexy, or Just a Modern-Day Chastity Belt?

This product announcement has us searching for the proper quip that will offend as few as possible: GPS lingerie is on the market (at last!) for all those women who ... have a poor sense of direction?
Yes, it's true, GPS lingerie has been introduced by Brazilian Lucia Lorio, who says her dainty garments are for the "modern, techno-savvy woman." This follows a great tradition of adding all sorts of odd technology to underwear.
But, maybe these are really for insecure husbands and boyfriends who want to keep track of their gals? That's the argument raised by some women who say the new underwear amounts to nothing more than a modern-day chastity belt. (Question: Does adding a GPS unit to any item instantly make that item more ... GPSey? Discuss amongst yourselves.)
Lorio says it isn't a chastity belt, since the wearer can turn off the device at any time – or simply keep the password to her GPS-tracking account a secret. In the end, a gimmick is a gimmick. At $800 to $1000 a set, we're going to suggest you stick with regular, cotton undies – and we'll stick with GPS for our cars, our pets, and maybe our kids.
Of course, this doesn't stop us from putting a picture of a woman in lingerie on our Web site. Either way, do you think this GPS lingerie is sexy, or is it just a modern-day chastity belt? Or do you think this is just too silly? Before make your final judgment, please check out our gallery of other iffy tech-related clothing below, and let us know what you think. [From: BoingBoing.]





Whitney Houston Dead: Singer Dies at 48, Body Found in Beverly Hilton Hotel
Whitney Houston Autopsy: Cause of Death Determined?
Whitney Houston, Bobbi Kristina: Late Singer's Daughter Hospitalized
Whitney Houston Dead: Stars React to Legend's Sudden Death
Grammy Red Carpet 2012 (PHOTOS)
Grammy 2012 Winners' List: Adele Sweeps Music's Biggest Night
Jennifer Hudson Whitney Tribute: Grammy President Reveals Why Singer Was Chosen for Musical Memorial
Katy Perry Grammy Performance 2012: Did the Diva Diss Her Ex-Hubby With Revealing New Song?
5-Hour Energy: A Success Equal Parts Caffeine, Chemistry and Meditation
People With Easy-To-Pronounce Names More Likely To Succeed, Study Says














Comments
27
Subscribe to commentsDarkLightNov 4th 2008 8:22PM
Just too silly. Useless thing.
dswynneNov 5th 2008 12:44AM
Maybe not, if you live in an area where kidnapping is the norm...
JBJG24MNov 5th 2008 7:34AM
AT JEAST ALL THE HUSBANDS COULD FIND THEIR WIVES AT THE MALL!!
GingerNov 5th 2008 8:19AM
Cute! EXCEPT statistically it's the 'zippers' that need 'monitoring'!
LillianNov 5th 2008 8:26AM
I wouldn't...not even as a gimmick! Humiliating and degrading!
mamieNov 5th 2008 9:01AM
I agree with the GPS idea on mens' zippers, they seem to go up and down too often. Not just when mother nature calls.
phillipNov 5th 2008 6:20PM
DEAR MAMIE,
I KINDA WATCH OPERA PRETTY OFTEN AND YOU SEEM LIKE MANY WOMEN WHO THINK MEN ARE DOGS BUT FAIL TO LOOK CLOSELY AND SEE MORE WOMEN ARE DOGS THAN MEN. ACORDING TO OPERA'S SURVEY OF WOMEN INCOURAGED TO ACTUALLY TELL THE TRUTH 85%OF WOMEN CHEAT AND 65% OF MEN CHEAT OVER THEIR LIFE TIME AND MARRIAGES.
SO JUST WALK IN THE BATHROOM AND LOOK IN THE MIRROR.
ChristyNov 17th 2008 9:31PM
Dear phillip,
I think you mean OPRAH.
s. perryNov 5th 2008 9:24AM
JUST MORE PARANOID MEN IN THIS WORLD--INSECURE AND LACK OF CONFIDENCE...IF A MAN HAS TO DO THIS TO KEEP UP WITH A WOMAN...."HE" IS THE ONE WITH THE PROBLEM!
JOHNNov 5th 2008 9:29AM
THESE WOULD BE A HIT IN DETROIT POLITICAL CIRCLES.
RachaelNov 5th 2008 10:20AM
These could be a great safety device. If a woman is kidnapped, her cell phone might be taken away, but perhaps not her underwear. It's not meant as a modern day chastity device - it's meant as LoJack for a person in case of dire emergencies.
ChuckNov 5th 2008 10:21AM
Get real if you can not trust the woman you are with then leave her I would never use this type of thing on the woman I love I trust her
MichelleNov 5th 2008 10:25AM
You might as well put a chip in your arm . . . they're going to take the lingerie off regardless. REDICULOUS, but that's what free market is all about. I wish them the best of luck!
CurtNov 5th 2008 11:16AM
If she has nothing to hide why would she mind wearing them?
Keith J. MohrhoffNov 5th 2008 11:44AM
In this day and age of 'instant' gratification, too many people think that 'feeling good now' is a God-given right. I am a man and I don't cheat. I work my butt off to try my best to earn the $$ to pay for the things that make life possible. I know from experience that the 'Ho-Jack' is necessary.
the DoctorNov 5th 2008 11:45AM
There is waaaaaaaayyyyyaaaayyyyyyyy too much disposable income in this world today!!
JohnskiNov 5th 2008 11:55AM
Every woman needs to wear one, so I can locate each of them....
Pam in MarylandNov 5th 2008 12:08PM
I've heard of dumb things in this world before but this just about takes the cake. Besides the stupidity of them in general just how easy would something in your underwear be to use? What? Everytime you need to find directions you have to get undressed? This had to be invented by a man. Only a male would be this stupid and this dense to think this had any place in the world at all. What a waste of time, money and resources. The company that spent their money on this would have been much better off putting it into something useful. Just goes to show you how wasteful some businesses are.
MamasaidNov 5th 2008 12:49PM
This is incredible. Of course, a woman could take them off and leave them elsewhere to deter tracking. Check out my thoughts at http://www.financialfashionista.blogspot.com to see what I think. Overall, it's still more practical than the million dollar diamond bras from Victoria's Secret.
Bill TeagueNov 5th 2008 12:28PM
I think if a man has to use this device to keep his woman then he should divorce her and move on but at the same time a woman should know not to drop her undies for every man she meets