<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Switched - Comments for Is Cuil a Google Killer?</title>
<link>http://www.switched.com/2008/07/31/is-cuil-a-google-killer/</link>
<description>Switched Comments for Is Cuil a Google Killer?</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Is Cuil a Google Killer?]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2008/07/31/is-cuil-a-google-killer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2008/07/31/is-cuil-a-google-killer/</guid><description><![CDATA[The result aren't anywhere as good as Google.<br><br>However, this: "Many searches on Google which would return hundreds of thousands or millions of links (like say "Saten Island" for example), turn up less than half as many on Cuil," may not be correct.<br><br>Google returns an ESTIMATE, not an exact count. Typically, most large result sets give out far short of the max.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Crypt2121]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 1st 2008 10:15AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Is Cuil a Google Killer?]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2008/07/31/is-cuil-a-google-killer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2008/07/31/is-cuil-a-google-killer/</guid><description><![CDATA[I've never even heard of this Cuil thing. I use Google.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Emma]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 1st 2008 1:15PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Is Cuil a Google Killer?]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2008/07/31/is-cuil-a-google-killer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2008/07/31/is-cuil-a-google-killer/</guid><description><![CDATA[I tried Cuil this week. The privacy policy is a big plus over google. I ran into the same search problems as described, but I chalked it up to be startup bugs. Given time this should be a great search engine. I would like to see them add free email. That would really give google a case of the cold sweats. As for not returning a kazillion search returns, who cares? After the first 2 pages of search returns I give up. I have already replaced the Yahoo quick search link in crazybrowser with Cuil. Can't wait till they really get rolling.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[UHUH]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 1st 2008 2:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Is Cuil a Google Killer?]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2008/07/31/is-cuil-a-google-killer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2008/07/31/is-cuil-a-google-killer/</guid><description><![CDATA[I agree. I was excited to hear about Cuil, as I am always eager to test new technologies. But I noticed that many of the results for common things were very irrelevant; it does not seem to do as good of a job finding WHAT YOU WANT TO FIND . On top of that, all of the "big boys" allow you to do separate image searches after doing a web search; Cuil seems to think that this is not important which is a careless and silly design flaw as far as I'm concerned. <br><br>Cuil is dead already. It's too bad, because when I heard that its chief architect was an ex-Google engineer, I assumed it would be simply awesome. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[nj]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 1st 2008 2:58PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Is Cuil a Google Killer?]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2008/07/31/is-cuil-a-google-killer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2008/07/31/is-cuil-a-google-killer/</guid><description><![CDATA[C'mon man. Give it a chance. There have to be a few bugs.Wait for Cuil v2 before you start bashing. Right now they are just getting their feet wet. From what I see they are off to a really good start. It's a much better interface than anyone else has come up with.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[UHUH]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 1st 2008 5:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Is Cuil a Google Killer?]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2008/07/31/is-cuil-a-google-killer/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2008/07/31/is-cuil-a-google-killer/</guid><description><![CDATA[Having heard a lot a buzz about the Cuil search engine, I decided to give it a side-by-side trial with Google, using separate tabs in Firefox.  After only a few minutes of searching for information and photos on lakes in the California Sierra Nevada (hardly an exotic topic), I closed the Cuil tab vowing never to return, as the Cuil search engine seemed more like a prank or a tool directed at the cognitively impaired  than a serious effort at improving web searching.<br><br>Not only did Cuil fail miserably at retrieving the desired information and pictures, the links and associated thumbnail photos usually had nothing to do with one another.  In one instance, clicking on a photo taken at a lake near Yosemite took me to a website located in Florida!  Using Google's sophisticated search syntax, however, yielded up dozens of *relevant* results within seconds.  "Cuil" may indeed rhyme with "cool", but it also rhymes with "fool", which is what a person would have to be to rely on the Cuil engine for serious searching.<br><br>There is a reason for Google's search hegemony:  it works.  Cuil doesn't and it is just that simple.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul H.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 2nd 2008 12:04PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
