Unlike
Rock Port, Missouri, the entire state of Delaware won't be 100-percent wind-powered after Bluewater Wind constructs a $1.6 billion wind park just off its shore, but the state will be able to "light about 50,000 homes a year" for the duration of the 25-year contract. Said agreement was just nailed down between the aforesaid firm and Delmarva Power, and it hopes to start powering homes
via wind by 2012.
The offshore site will sit around 12 miles off Rehoboth Beach, with a number of turbines to be planted 90-feet into the sea floor and sport three blades apiece measuring 150-feet long. It's noted that vacationers and locals alike won't be able to notice the park from the beach except on a few remarkably clear days, but if their energy bills sink because of it, we don't really think they'll mind, anyway. [Source:
CNN]
Tags: alternative energy, AlternativeEnergy, delaware, electricity, energy, green, power, turbine, wind, wind power, wind powered, wind turbines, wind-powered, WindPower, WindPowered, WindTurbines
Comments
2
Subscribe to commentsrickJun 30th 2008 3:53AM
A GOOD IDEA!
The wind farm will generate electricity without contributing to global warming, plus the wind used to generate the electricity is FREE - unlike coal or oil.
We have wind-powered "farms" here in CO and WYO and they work!
Granted, there is some loss of wildlife (mainly birds) and habitat - but then oil and coal development also causes MORE loss of wildlife and habitat toocomparatively speaking.
PLUS, the wind farms don't contribute to global warming - they don't emit CO2 or other gases like burning oil and coal does.
Vincent CollinsJun 30th 2008 8:54AM
"Wind farms" do little or nothing to reduce CO2 emissions because they require back-up generation from fossil-fuel plants to balance the load on the grid, which must exactly equal demand at all times There is no storage of electricity on the grid, and since wind generation is intermittent and unpredictable, dirty coal plants must remain fired up and online to cover periods of no or low wind. The more wind energy we have, the more conventional plants we will need to back it up.
They are nothing but tax shelters for wealthy investors, and wouldn't exist but for the federal tax subsidy of $23.37 per mWh we taxpayers are required to contribute. Like ethanol, just another "alternative energy" boondoggle.