<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Switched - Comments for What Will the Presidential Candidates Look Like in Four Years?</title>
<link>http://www.switched.com/2008/04/30/what-will-the-candidates-look-like-in-4-years/</link>
<description>Switched Comments for What Will the Presidential Candidates Look Like in Four Years?</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on What Will the Presidential Candidates Look Like in Four Years?]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2008/04/30/what-will-the-candidates-look-like-in-4-years/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2008/04/30/what-will-the-candidates-look-like-in-4-years/</guid><description><![CDATA[I think there must be a typo or they over-aged them. I think that's what they will look like in 8 years, but certainly not just 4 years. Why don't they show us a picture of bush from 2004? Why age Bush 8 years and say the rest are 4. Something isn't right. That sounds more like "What will they look like in 8 years."<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MadMike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 30th 2008 5:52PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
