New Body Scans at Airport Security See Through Clothes

Which would you prefer at the airport security check: a pat down or a "whole body imaging scan" that provides a highly detailed image of all your, um, curves (but does have your face blurred to protect your identity)?
The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has been testing out these devices, called millimeter wave machines, at Phoenix's Sky Harbor International Airport and this week is adding the machines to Los Angeles International Airport and New York City's John F. Kennedy International.
The TSA says that during the test in Phoenix, 90 percent of travelers preferred the scan to having a full body pat down. The TSA agent viewing the image from one of the devices will be in a separate booth and will not be able to see the traveler's face in order to maintain privacy. After the image has been checked it won't be stored, according to the TSA.
Even so, are these images invasive? What about privacy concerns?According to the TSA blog, "These images are friendly enough to post in a preschool. Heck, it could even make the cover of Reader's Digest and not offend anybody."
The TSA also claims the machine emits 10,000 times less energy than a cell phone transmission.
You can see how the body image is captured in a video here and also watch a demonstration of the actual machine in motion here.
Millimeter wave machines are already in use at airports in Britain, Spain, Japan, Australia, Mexico, Thailand and the Netherlands. [Source CNN]



Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
teslasnp said 11:22AM on 4-18-2008
just one step closer to losing any semblance of privacy that we thought we had.
Reply
Nijnsky said 12:47PM on 4-18-2008
oh gosh, the person review all the scans, must have a field day... It would be like watching porn while working.
Reply
Dan said 2:02PM on 4-18-2008
It this only for explosives and chemicals or will this detect drugs as well.
like pot or something else?
Reply
Greg said 4:36PM on 4-18-2008
The article says:
According to the TSA blog, "These images are friendly enough to post in a preschool. Heck, it could even make the cover of Reader's Digest and not offend anybody."
Instead of making unsupported assertions that these pics are not offensive, why didn't they just show us a half dozen of these pics of various people from various angles? This was the obvious, better way to convince us that the pics are not offensive. The fact that they didn't makes me suspicious.
Reply
julie said 10:24AM on 5-24-2008
Don't worry about the radiation exposure, it only builds up over time slowly breaking down cells and further weakening your immune system. Your elderly immune suppressed Grandmother or pregnant wife shouldn't worry...really?
Reply
Ariel said 2:09PM on 7-06-2008
Just another reason why we have to throw the Bush-Cheney crowd out of office. They treat the Bill of rights like toilet paper with which they wipe their backsides
Reply
Candy said 8:40PM on 10-15-2008
oh Gosh.....
I dont like it. I dont like airport sercurity checking me out.
No privacy.....
Disappointed................
Reply
Mike said 2:52PM on 2-20-2009
What about the fact of someone seeing underneath the clothes of minors? Shouldn't this be a big concern as well.
Reply
kundalini77 said 7:32PM on 7-19-2009
Yeah,
Problem, Reaction, solution,
Create a problem = Terrorism, there all out to get us, lets have a war on something that can never be won.
Reaction = you the people demand it be stopped,
Solution = Look we will just take away some of your freedoms, not all of them, just a few you really wont even miss them.
Big Brother is not coming he's here
Reply