<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Switched - Comments for Google Search Modified to Fight Child Pornography</title>
<link>http://www.switched.com/2008/04/15/google-search-modified-to-fight-child-pornography/</link>
<description>Switched Comments for Google Search Modified to Fight Child Pornography</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Google Search Modified to Fight Child Pornography]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2008/04/15/google-search-modified-to-fight-child-pornography/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2008/04/15/google-search-modified-to-fight-child-pornography/</guid><description><![CDATA[Go Google! <br><br>I'm confused by patterning though, they only track images/videos uploaded? I have mixed emotions about search patterning though (I was debating the whole privacy/protection thing). I would love to see Google red-flagging people searching for "Child Porn" (and variants), but at the same time, what if I was trying to look up statistics on it, say if I wanted to find out what percentage of the youth were abused or some such. I think Google could implement ways of doing that though, if someone was searching for Child Porn 3x a day for a year, it would be fairly safe to say it's time to red flag this person. <br><br>Oh man, another thought: if they can get on MySpace, they are going to have a field day! HAHAHA]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Apr 16th 2008 5:22AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>