Don't Spring for $50 HDMI Cables --Those $10 Ones Are Just As Good

In fact, the tech site CNET has been using "high-end" $20 cables from Monoprice in its labs for testing top of the line TVs from companies such as Samsung and Sony. And trust us, CNET abuses those cables more than you ever could in your standard home theater set up.
The truth of the matter is that as far as digital signals are concerned, the quality of the cable matters very little. Used in HDTV and most satellite and cable systems these days, digital signals don't degrade as quickly and aren't subject to interference the same way that analog signals are.
So, unless you plan on running 20- and 30-foot cables around your house, or are building an audio or video production studio, you can stick to those cheaper $10 HDMI cables and will still get nothing but a top quality image.
From CNET
Related Links:
- Westinghouse Takes HD Wireless
- Electronics Retailer Busted in Video Cable Quality Hoax
- Low-End Vs. High-End HDMI Throw Down





Live from Google I/O's 2013 opening keynote!
Chili's Waitress Fired Over Facebook Post Insulting 'Stupid Cops'
Save on Spring Cleaning With a New Vacuum -- Savings Experiment
Billboard Music Awards: Worst Dressed (or Most Daring?) From Past Red Carpets
HSBC Plans 14,000 More Job Cuts
Forbidden America: Cold War-Era Map Shows No-Go Zones For Soviet Tourists
BBC Host Paula White Pulled Off Air After Sounding Drunk
Man Takes Dump In Background Of Instructional Workout Video
Tenants: Stench of Death Makes St. Louis Complex 'Unlivable'
Famous Roadside Attractions














Comments
4
Subscribe to commentsterri smithApr 8th 2008 7:08AM
This is so true, I bought (7) 6 foot HDMI cables from overstock.com for like $10 each, along with a HDMI switch box and the cables are wonderful. They work as well as the 3 foot HDMI cable that cost me $30 at walmart.
Damien KutnyJan 24th 2009 12:30PM
With great respect, I must comment that your evaluations are merely a glimpse into what a "high-end" cable can be. Most likely, all of the cables reviewed have come from the same factory. $50 is not very expensive for an HDMI cable. Our company has done extensive testing on high-end cabling with great sources, and accurate display devices. There is in fact a difference in color balance, black level, detail (or sharpness), noise level and perception in depth of field. This is exponential above 5m in length. So much so, that compensation (or EQ) is mandatory to maintain full bit strength. We offer products from MIT and Tributaries that will solidify these comments and provide a new level of performance, should your readers choose to go beyond generic, mass-market cabling.
Sincerely,
-Damien Kutny
Chief Technologist
Overture: Ultimate Home Electronics
http://www.overtureav.com
DarkstarJan 25th 2009 4:25PM
I hope you're trying to be funny....
Even if you are, this sort of comment isn't helping - plenty of people are still paying way over the odds for 'premium' cables.
If you still want to blow a wad of cash on a premium cable, look out for things like:
- flexibility
- durabilty
- cable length
(and even then, most people don't care how flexible or durable a cable is)
The only thing you should not worry about is picture quality. HDMI cables carry digital signals. The signal either works or it doesn't (like a DVI/USB cable). Would you pay more for a USB cable to improve "color balance, black level" when transfering photo's from a camera?
CodyMar 29th 2009 12:02AM
My HDMI cable was $2.50...Amazon.com FTW