Pioneer to Stop Making Plasma TVs
In the battle for thin-panel television supremacy, the plasma display for many years has been the superior choice, relying on individual pockets of excitable gas to produce bright colors and rich blacks. But ever since the upstart LCD panel display came into the HDTV market, it's been gradually nipping at plasma's heels, and, after years of refinements, has finally started to offer similar visual performance at lower price and in a much lighter package. This has meant bad news for the plasma industry, with the latest blow being word that Pioneer, one of the leading plasma manufacturers, will stop making plasma panels.
Pioneer will still sell its well-respected Kuro series plasma displays, known for being some of the best on the market. But it will no longer actually manufacture the panels used inside of those sets, instead turning to a third-party (in this case, Panasonic). What this means for the cost and quality of these sets remains to be seen. If Panasonic makes the panels but adds Pioneer's excellent video processing and other technologies, perhaps the Pioneer that many videophiles (including us) know and love will live on. Or maybe Pioneer will figure out some way to give us in LCDs what we loved in its plasmas, since the company plants to start releasing Kuro-branded LCDs televisions this Fall.
So, sorry plasma lovers. It's quite possible that your format of choice is going the way of HD-DVD. With any luck, though, the new crop of Organic Light Emitting Diode or OLED televisions, which deliver even brighter colors and deeper blacks than plasmas, will be inexpensive enough to fill the void in a few years.
From Engadget
Related Links:
- LCD TV Prices to Dive Even Lower in 2008
- Pioneer Unveils Super-Thin, High-Contrast Plasma TVs
- Sony's Almost-Paper-Thin OLED-TV Coming to U.S.
- Our Best TV Pick: Pioneer Kuro Elite






Family Faces Eviction Over Toddler's Noise
Karen Perry Loses Three Kids, Ex-Husband and Now Home?
Who's Buying Your Next President? Sheldon Adelson Makes His Bid
Courtney Love, Pet Killer? Frances Bean Says Hoarding, Drugs Led to Animal Deaths
6 Ways The Job Search Has Changed Post-Recession
Why the U.S. Should Get Rid of the $1 Bill
Which Ford Mustang is most popular with thieves? [w/video]
Amy Winehouse Coroner Resigns: 'Unqualified' Autopsy May Be Ruled Illegal
Open Houses of the Week: Super Bowl Weekend
7 Startling Numbers We Now Know About Facebook















Comments
3
Subscribe to commentsnycmuscleasianMar 15th 2008 4:37AM
The headline of this article is misleading. It should have been:
"Pioneer to Stop Making Plasma PANELS, BUT Will Continue to Make Plasma TVs."
Daniel GauntMar 15th 2008 6:01AM
most people can't afford plasma anyway
http://freeextras.blogspot.com/
http://lifeorsomethingnotquitelikeit.blogspot.com/
nycmuscleasianMar 15th 2008 11:09PM
Disagree again.
A more appropriate comment should have been:
"Most people cannot afford TVs larger than 50"."
When you compare cost of plasma as compared to LCD, PLASMA CHEAPER THAN LCD per square inch of screen surface area. However, plasma TVs do not come under 37" and most are 42" and 50". ANY 40" LCD set is MORE expensive than 42" plasma, and ANY 52" LCD is significantly more expensive than 50" plasma sets.
So more people can afford plasma sets if they were made smaller like LCD sets...