CIA Says Hackers Have Already Cut Power In 'Multiple' Cities
Perhaps having seen the latest Die Hard movie a few too many times, a bunch of hackers have quite promptly hacked their way into computer systems in various cities, attacking the grids and cutting their power. The goal? Anarchy. Or, who knows, maybe just free donuts (assuming Krispy Kreme doesn't have a backup battery for their security system). The CIA believes the goal was extortion.
"We have information, from multiple regions outside the United States, of cyber intrusions into utilities, followed by extortion demands," said CIA analyst Tom Donahue, in a statement posted on the Internet and reported yesterday by PC World. "In at least one case, the disruption caused a power outage affecting multiple cities. We do not know who executed these attacks or why, but all involved intrusions through the Internet."
Unfortunately, in true CIA-fear-mongering style, the statement offered no specifics as to which "multiple" cities were affected.
Oh well. Here's hoping the next time they pull this off it's not in the middle of the first episode in the new season of Lost.
From PCWorld.com
Related Links:





Whitney Houston Autopsy: Cause of Death Determined?
Whitney Houston, Bobbi Kristina: Late Singer's Daughter Hospitalized
Adele Five-Year Break? Singer Plans to Focus on Relationship, Write 'Happy Record'
Jennifer Hudson Whitney Tribute: Grammy President Reveals Why Singer Was Chosen for Musical Memorial
Grammy 2012 Winners' List: Adele Sweeps Music's Biggest Night
3 Economic Misconceptions That Need to Die
5-Hour Energy: A Success Equal Parts Caffeine, Chemistry and Meditation
People With Easy-To-Pronounce Names More Likely To Succeed, Study Says
Whitney Houston Dead: Stars React to Legend's Sudden Death
Katy Perry Grammy Performance 2012: Did the Diva Diss Her Ex-Hubby With Revealing New Song?














Comments
1
Subscribe to commentsMike SandersJan 26th 2008 6:06PM
Who in their right mind, would put an "isolated" control system on the Internet? Even though it could be encrypted end-to-end, the "cloud" path should still have some kind of legacy connection, offering fallback, geographic redundancy and a means of verification. Some things just don't belong on the Internet, unless they exist in parallel with alternate media, modes of transmission and even architectures, to screw up the hackers. Sure, that costs more, but not nearly as much as it may sound, especially for a critical application, like power control & monitoring. This is the reason why enteprises are slow to migrate their "old" systems to web-based systems. We spend millions, ensuring that a data-links within companies like General Motors and the financial district are secure, but what can we do if the lights go down? Oh yeah, UPS's, but they won't run the machinery in an assembly plant!
The Internet is not your Savior!