Tumblr 101: Tips And Tricks To Get Started
Sebastian Thrun: Google's Driverless Car
Two-Hour New York-Tokyo Flights Coming Soon?
Chances are you've never heard of a scramjet, and if you have, we can almost guarantee you've never seen one in action (unless you happen to work for NASA or DARPA). The concept of scramjets has been around for a while -- President Reagan even announced a major scramjet project, the National Aerospace Plane, in his 1986 State of the Union address. Reagan envisioned the scramjet replacing the space shuttle, military bombers and commercial aircraft. The program never got off the ground and was canceled by President Clinton in 1994.
Recent advances, however, have moved the scramjet from the lab to field tests. While researchers have been testing scramjets for a couple years, the most recent tests have been extremely favorable.
Scramjets work by sucking air to a chamber that narrows until the air is so condensed it ignites. Just before ignition, standard jet fuel is injected into the chamber. The lack of moving parts and modern construction materials mean that scramjets can withstand much more heat and force than a standard turbine-powered jet engine. Standard jet turbines would melt around Mach 3, but theoretically scramjets should be viable up to Mach 15, or around 10,000 miles per hour. That means that a two-hour flight from New York to Tokyo is theoretically possible.
Of course, the interest in scramjets isn't just about transportation. The military foresees scramjet-powered intercontinental ballistic missiles capable of hitting targets around the globe before an enemy would even have a chance to respond. And, of course, America isn't the only one racing for the prize. The governments of China, Australia, and others are in hot pursuit of the first practical scramjet engine.
From Slashdot and Popular Science
Related links:
- Scientists Clone Fluorescent Cats
- Bionic Arm Restores Sensation and Mobility to Amputees
- New Super CT Scanner Could Change Medicine
Jennifer Aniston's Effortlessly Sexy Style
Whitney Houston Dead: Singer Dies at 48, Body Found in Beverly Hilton Hotel
Sheryl Crow Loves To Flaunt Toned Physique
Whitney Houston, Bobbi Kristina: Late Singer's Daughter Hospitalized
Whitney Houston Dead: Stars React to Legend's Sudden Death
QUIZ: How Much Do You Know About Marriage In The U.S.?
Whitney Houston Autopsy: Cause of Death Determined?
Grammy Red Carpet 2012 (PHOTOS)
PHOTOS: Remembering Whitney Houston's Glittering Style
Tips for flying cheaper in 2012
Grammy 2012 Winners' List: Adele Sweeps Music's Biggest Night
LINSANITY CONTINUES
There's only one thing to do when the Nürburgring is covered in snow...
Tax Reform in This Election Year: It's Not Likely
Comforter Soaked In Blood Found In Josh Powell's Storage Unit
Whitney Houston, Bobby Brown: Ex-Husband Honors Singer Onstage
Grammy Awards 2012: The Best & Worst Of The Red Carpet!
TV's Best Music Moments
The Happiest People In The World...
Mitt Romney Wins Maine Caucus
PHOTOS: Two Outfits, One Day!
WATCH: Chainsaw-Wielding Thug Attacks Pub Crawlers
Chloë Moretz Is All Grown Up
Simon Cowell: Whitney Would've Been The Ultimate 'X Factor' Mentor
New Rankings Finds D.C. Is A Great Place For Single Men
'There's No Way She's Dead'
PHOTOS: J.Lo Strips Down
SLIDESHOW: Scientists On God
Former Wall Street Journal Columnist, Best-Selling Author Dies
Anna And Andre Sit Front Row, 1996
WATCH: Adorable Animals Riding Other Animals
15 Obnoxious Notes From Roommates
Comments
43
Subscribe to commentsmarknew91Feb 19th 2008 7:06PM
I'm with Jess, Bob and Carolyn.
They spoke on the subject of "Two hour scramjet flight to Tokyo?"
Here is the original post:
Bob Rosen says:
Please God...May I never, never be in that much of a hurry to get to Toyko.
12/17/07 6:02 PM
Bob RosenDec 17th 2007 6:02PM
Please God...May I never, never be in that much of a hurry to get to Toyko!!!
Carolyn GrahamDec 17th 2007 7:19PM
I'm with you, Bob!
johnrwhitehurstDec 17th 2007 9:25PM
This means it will take longer to get through aiport security than the trip itself.
Jess LDec 17th 2007 11:07PM
I'm with Bob & Carolyn! and just how safe are these anyways?
GLODec 18th 2007 5:31AM
GREETINGS WELL I LIKE IT ! THIS PROJECT CAN BE WONDERFUL, B'CUZ I NEED TO TRAVEL 18 HOURS WHEN I FLY TO VISITED MY SON,& HIS FAMILY, I'M VERY SCARE OF FLY BUT I THINKING 2 HOURS IS BETTER THEN 18 (ô_ô) HAVE A NICE DAY EVRY BODY SAYONARA !
Phillip B. LambDec 18th 2007 7:41AM
Dramatically-faster flights could overwhelm the air-traffic control system and require the FAA too hire specially-bred chimpanzees to man the screens in control centers. Since most flights serve mainly peanuts, flying may become merely monkey business. If apes were ever trained as low-cost pilots, then beware! The friendly skies could turn into a real jungle.
BillDec 18th 2007 8:02AM
JUST WHAT WE NEED, MORE WAR MACHINES THAT PRETEND TO BE GOOD FOR THE GENERAL PUBLIC. WHEN IS EARTH GOING TO SMARTEN UP AND START TAKING CARE OF THEIR PEOPLE. PEOPLE STARVING AND DYING OF DISEASE AND ALL OF THE MONEY GOES TO A PIECE OF METAL. I JUST DON'T GET IT.
FranDec 19th 2007 12:19AM
Is it just me or does anyone else notie that none of the posters I've read even indicate they understand the import of the last few lines, the slipped in at the end of this article?
Here we go again...
St Reagan tried to get us all killed with his "Star Wars" Plan that seems to have resurfaced as "Scramjet".
2hour flight to Tokyo, Hah!
Daniel GauntDec 19th 2007 10:14AM
Yes the faster the better! planes are never very comfy so you want the journey to be over as quickly as possible!
http://r.yuwie.com/naturistdaniel
http://drrockisback.spaces.live.com/
http://www.freewebs.com/dr_rock/
@#$%&!Dec 19th 2007 1:38PM
Just what we need: Faster, cheaper, deadlier missiles that are harder to track. Way to go, you warmongering technonazis. May the first ones fall on you and your scumbag offspring.
RickDec 19th 2007 5:01PM
Fear of technological advancement is still alive and well, I see. You cannot name a natural or man-made device or concept that put into the wrong hands cannot be used for some diabolical purpose. It's the nature of the warped mind, not of technology. With any increase in an item's usefulness, the more devastating the consequences when misused by those bent on destroying their fellow man.
john mournianDec 21st 2007 3:01AM
I recall trying to build a small "scramjet" for a university project, but never heard about results. What is slowest speed that a "scramjet" powered aircraft would be able to land? I other words; how far down can you control power output?
DoreneDec 19th 2007 11:35PM
Does it come with a complimentary bib?
mike weberDec 20th 2007 9:47AM
As to landing - no, scramjets (which are just an improvement of the ramjet, one of the earliest designs) - cannot be throttled back sufficently for landing, nor can they operate at all at sppeds less than some percentage Mach (i forget the precise numbers), since they have to be moving fairpy fast to get the air compression necessary for operation (current airliners use turbojet or turbofan jet engines, which have a compressor in front that allows them to operate whan the aircraft is not moving at all).
The answer is dual-mode designs, in which a conventional engine gets the aircraft off the gtound and up to speed for the scramjet to kick in, or else some form of catapault launcher...
John GrundyDec 20th 2007 2:51PM
I only hope I live long enough to see one crash. Now that should be a scene never before witnessed. For sure there will be no survivors.
John GrundyDec 20th 2007 2:52PM
I can't wait to see one crash. Now that will be something to see! And 100% sure there will be no survivors!
grnDec 20th 2007 10:11PM
Scram jets have been around a lot longer than whats being portrayed. However; till now they have been cost prohibitive except for military and other deep pockets. As for safety, once the material concerns are worked out, it would be much safer as there are minimal moving parts. If you research on the ground and in the air failures of aircraft, you'll find many related the turbines/compressors as found in normal jet engines.
grnDec 20th 2007 10:22PM
Look to the SR 71 for further insight
grnDec 20th 2007 10:23PM
war mongering technonazis is it?
Well to the tree-hugging liberal morons think this is just for military, think again.
The cold reality is, this media that you are posting on, the materials in your car, the calculator you figure up your yuppie salary on, and many other things all had their roots in military research. You people have obviously missed the boat on common sense, and sense of self, as you continuously chose to follow lockstep in with the ultra liberal left.