Traditionalists might balk, but the holiday shopping season is already underway. Skeptical? Head to your local department store and you'll be inundated by Christmas trees and ornaments. Bargain hunters, though, know that the real deals are more than a month away.
Black Friday, traditionally, is when retailers truly slash prices. Early birds can save hundreds, if not thousands, of dollars off of their holiday bills. Switched.com checked with a few elves, who gave a sneak peek at what you can expect deal-wise this year.
Blu-ray Players and Movies: Blu-ray is shaping up to be the biggest door buster of this year's Black Friday. de Grandpre expects at least one retailer will offer a Blu-ray player for just $49. Look for bargains on Blu-ray films as well, with last year's hit titles (such as "Iron Man") to fall as low as $5.
Laptops: With the proliferation of Netbooks this year, it's never been easier to find affordable portable computing, but Dan de Grandpre, CEO of DealNews.com says it will get even cheaper on Black Friday. Look for well-equipped Netbooks to sell for $199 – and basic 15" laptops to go for as little as $249.
HDTVs (Pretty big): The holidays are typically the best time to buy a new TV – and Black Friday is the time to do it. If you're looking for a normal sized set, you're in luck. Piper Jaffrey analyst Mitch Kaiser says he expects to see 32-inch LCD sets for as low as $299. GottaDeal.com is estimating 37-inch plasma and LCD sets will fall to $399 or less.
HDTVs (Really big): Need something bigger? How about a 46-47 inch LCD set for $599 – a 25 percent savings? Or a 52-inch LCD for $999? Dealnews says you can expect both. Plasma deals will be a little harder to come by, but a 50-inch set should run roughly $899.
HD Camcorders: You've wanted to shoot your child's school play in HD for a while, but haven't been able to spring for the pricey camcorder. This might be the year. Low-end, flash-based 720p models could drop as low as $60 (though you won't be able to zoom with those). Expect a high quality 1080p HD camcorder for $349.
GPS: While navigation systems have dramatically expanded their reach this year – even making it onto the iPhone – there's still a market for car-based systems. Dealnews predicts you'll be able to find a no-name entry-level system for $49, while a Garmin or Tom-Tom brand will be as low as $69.
Digital Picture Frames: Showcasing your digital pictures consistently gets cheaper. This year, skip the 7-inch screens and focus on the 8- or 9-inch ones, which should be available on Black Friday for as little as $30.
Monitors: Computer monitors might not be the sexiest of gifts, but they're usually welcomed with open arms – and they'll be cheap this year. Name brand 22-inch LCD models may go for as low as $99, while 24-inch models will drop below $150.
Memory: Don't know anyone who needs a monitor? External hard drives are always popular, since they're an easy way to back-up data. Dealnews expects a 1TB drive to fall as low as $49 this year. Gottadeal is looking for 8GB flash drives to hit $15.
_thumbnail.jpg "Vintage Keyboards")
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 12)
toosweet4nj said 1:53PM on 6-20-2008
looks tome like the light has the color...not the cat
Reply
R said 12:53PM on 12-13-2007
The purpose of making them fluorescent is not to be funny or cruel like the author of this article suggests. Firstly, under normal light say from an incandescent light bulb or in normal sunlight, the animals will not be emitting radiation like a Christmas tree. The fluorescent colors are only visible (yes, how could have logic guessed it) under a fluorescent bulb. Particular genes, extracted from other animal species which are naturally fluorescent (say from the ocean) are inserted into an animal cell. That cell will produce the corresponding protein which when exposed to a fluorescent light source will have its electrons excited so that the color will appear. Typical colors used for such tagging experiments are green (green fluorescent protein-GFP; perhaps you might want to spend 30-seconds of research), red, blue or occasionally yellow.
As for the connection between a disease and making animals express certain tagging proteins, well let me start by saying, you are not a biologist so don't imply something insidious about the research being done. You do not need to do a few years of laboratory research but merely a few minutes on wikipedia to look up what's the point of making certain cells glow. As I stated, it is done to tag cells. To understand how an organism, especially a mammalian one as complex as a cat develops cell by cell, tracing the mitotic pathway, it is an excellent tool to be able to trace what cell ends up where. In fact Nobel prizes have been won for doing exactly that in the Nematode (C. Elegans) model, tracing all the cells from its original stem source. It would take textbooks to explain all the different experiments that can be done by tagging cells (hence the reason why people go to Medical School and Graduate school for Ph.D.s; so as not to make sensationalist claims on an AOL News Source), so I won't go into it here.
Next time, do a little bit of research and don't come off as a simpleton.
Reply
elizabeth said 1:33PM on 12-13-2007
I personally think it's time we stop experimenting. It seems to me the more we are able to change what's natural into something unnatural the more we want to experiment. Our world is slowly dying. Let's leave nature alone....the way it was originally intended before we get totally out of control and before we all become unrecognizable.
Reply
A said 1:41PM on 12-13-2007
Perfectly stated R:
That is the problem with most blogs and message boards on AOL. The writers are simpletons, and have not a clue as to details, of what, they speak (write) of.
Perhaps we should (as consumers) demand and begin standardized IQ testing for those who have contracts to write for AOL... and it should be WELL above average!
I am getting increasingly tired of having my head ache with the amount of ignorance I am subject to on a daily basis from these bloggers & reporters for that matter!
IT is simple: I will "learn ya" the same bit of common sense my Father taught me... IF YOU ARE NOT EDUCATED OR EVEN REMOTELY KNOWLEDGABLE ON A PARTICULAR SUBJECT MATTER, YOU ARE NOT ENTITLED TO AN OPINION ON IT... AND YOU ARE MOST CERTAINLY NOT ENTITLED TO WRITE ABOUT IT!
Go "edu-ma-cate" yourself, then form an (OR IMPLY ONE AS YOU DID) opinion Mr. O'Brien!
You will maybe go places if you do so....
Reply
Fae said 2:28PM on 12-13-2007
In my opinion, it is NOT okay to experiment on "other species" without their consent! They have the RIGHT to live without the fear of "torture". WHY should they have to die, so that more ignorant humans can live longer... If scientists want to "experiment"; Please... do so on YOURSELF! I am certain there are millions of people who would volunteer, if paid. Leave the innocent creatures alone! Since we as a species are "overpopulated", it's time we "thinned out" our own HERD; as we would do other species of animals. IF the experiments only benefit humans, USE humans as the subjects... of course, only with their approval.
Reply
cg said 2:55PM on 12-13-2007
I'm with you FAE. This is a sicko human world and getting more pathetic every day. Everything was ALREADY created as it should be and mankind needs to stop playing CREATOR and doing heinous/ludicrist things to animals and other living things just to exist in the fantasy that they did something useful. Never an attitude of prevention in the preservation of their own health, just mutilation while they play "little chemist". There should be a code of ethics they have to follow that say's they MUST experiment on themselves and their own family first.
Reply
JBJG said 3:10PM on 12-13-2007
AND JUST WHY DO WE NEED FLOURESCENT CATS??????????????????????????
Reply
Kathleen Leary said 10:42AM on 12-14-2007
The time for experimenting on animals, keeping them in cruel conditions, and exposing them to poisons, cancers and tumors is now over. Yes human subjects can be asked- besides often results from experiments on animals to not yield similar findings in humans-we also have computer generated models which can be of assistance. As a medical research professional I do experiment on myself-med, herbal effects, etc. Animals have advanced our science and medicine, but now these animal experiments are often redundent and study results are often falsified for profit. And on those animals which we have used for science should be treated, and released, or given maximum freedom and treated as heroes instead of having a life of torture and grief
Reply
Mike said 11:11AM on 12-14-2007
This is stupid,bet taxpayer money was involved.There is enough problems in the world for the scientist to solve instead of making
cats glow.
Reply
Doctor Bob said 11:26AM on 12-14-2007
There's no use.... the ignoramuses keep popping up in their little 16th Century witch-burning outfits, complaining about research that they know nothing about. Hey, dummies, if you don't understand this research or appreciate it's prospects, why don't you sell your computer and move into your back yards to live? You'll be right at home with the bugs and the squirrels.
Reply
Erin said 11:30AM on 12-14-2007
i think that they should stop making pets glow and use there own bodies if they need to no this stuff so bad you no animals have feelings to!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! >:O
Reply
bulletsarevogue said 11:43AM on 12-14-2007
I want a glowing kitty :(
Reply
Chantrelle said 12:18PM on 12-14-2007
I think that it's cruel and inhumane what people do just for science!I'm sure that there is a better way that scientists can use to find a cure or whatever they are using this "expierement" for!! Poor cats!!And what a waste of money!!There are so many better things that you can be doing with that money but making glow in the dark cats cmon!!
Reply
mincpa said 12:40PM on 12-14-2007
I wonder if they have florescent poo?
You know, I love animals but I cannot take care of them because of their poo. I'd pick up glowing poo!
Honestly, the research CAN do good stuff for us all and the animals are not suffering for glowing?
Anyway, I do agree it's a little perverse to have glowing cats and stuff, but if it saves a human's life and the animal doesn't suffer, well..... hey it's kinda cool.
Reply
J.S. said 11:48AM on 12-14-2007
I think it is so stupid how people always try and make themselves look so smart on these online blogs! As for the cats I think I'll be putting one on my Christmas list!
Reply
Barbara Craig said 11:57AM on 12-14-2007
Doctor Bob is the idiot he is calling everyone else that's aganist making cats flourescent. We don't need to use animals to do scientific research any more!! And, yes, I have a medical degree. And my daughter has a PhD in Biology and is a forensic scientist. So, there Doctor Bob......idiot!!!
Reply
sam said 12:03PM on 12-14-2007
The article writer wants to know what glowing cats has to do with aids. How about we make the carriers of aids glow under black lights in nightclubs so they can be identified as the danger they are?
Reply
Renee said 12:24PM on 12-14-2007
Yes, it may not hurt them now, but do you realize how many cats, fish, mice etc. get hurt in the process? You may be a biologist and not care for the welfare of animals such as mice but I am a vegetarian and think it is wrong that we test rediculous things such as making cats glow, hair products, makeup etc. on animals. It isn't there fault we can't find more humane ways of entertaining ourselves than making something helpless glow.
Reply
Kim said 12:31PM on 12-14-2007
Oh please. This has to be the STUPIDEST most obvious hoax ever to come out of Korea.
Reply
greenkitty said 1:33PM on 12-14-2007
Hey Sam....I have a better idea...how about you buy one of those glowing condoms next time you hit up the night club scene. Take some responsibility to your own health and never assume anything about anybody. I'm all for non-sentient animals getting tested on...and it's a bonus if you get a marketable product out of your tests.
Reply