<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Switched - Comments for </title>
<link>http://www.switched.com/2007/12/11/sonys-super-slim-oled-tv-coming-to-u-s-next-year/</link>
<description>Switched Comments for </description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2008 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/12/11/sonys-super-slim-oled-tv-coming-to-u-s-next-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/12/11/sonys-super-slim-oled-tv-coming-to-u-s-next-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[If they can make a flat screen like that, why cant the make PS3 games.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[J]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 11th 2007 3:23PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/12/11/sonys-super-slim-oled-tv-coming-to-u-s-next-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/12/11/sonys-super-slim-oled-tv-coming-to-u-s-next-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hey!  Thin tv's, both very thin and very inexpensive, were promised by Motorola for a release this year.  Whatever happened to NED tv?  NED= nano-emissive something.  They were able to grow carbon nanotubes directly onto glass and the nanotubes each emit electrons which light up phosphers - like in a CRT but with millions of nano tubes the resolution was better, screens bigger and the tv was lighter and much thinner.  Best of all they were supposed to retail for a fraction of thecost of plasmas or LC's.  So, where'd they go?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Marko]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 12th 2007 11:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/12/11/sonys-super-slim-oled-tv-coming-to-u-s-next-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/12/11/sonys-super-slim-oled-tv-coming-to-u-s-next-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hey, here's a thought. It will only last a while to be sure you have to replace it, and keep getting your money!<br>AAHHHHH, Consumerism.......]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nicole]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 20th 2007 4:09PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/12/11/sonys-super-slim-oled-tv-coming-to-u-s-next-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/12/11/sonys-super-slim-oled-tv-coming-to-u-s-next-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[Lets see now, high price and a short life span. Yep sounds like a real winner for American consumers. Count me out.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[doda]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 26th 2007 3:11PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/12/11/sonys-super-slim-oled-tv-coming-to-u-s-next-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/12/11/sonys-super-slim-oled-tv-coming-to-u-s-next-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[THEY ARE JUST SHOWING US THE LATEST TECHNOLOGY NOT TELLING US TO BUY THEM. EVERY ONE OF THE SETS WE HAVE OR HAVE HAD OVER THE YEARS STARTED VERY EXPENSIVE AND PRICES WERE REDUCED EITHER WHEN THE TECHNOLOGY AND PRODUCTION IMPROVED OR WHEN BETTER TECHNOLOGY WAS INVENTED. THE MARKET WILL ALWAYS DECIDE WHAT GOES OR STAYS. bUT AS WE ALL KNOW WE MUST HAVE THE BEST AND LATEST NO MATTER WHAT IT COSTS.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MIKE]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 26th 2007 10:25PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/12/11/sonys-super-slim-oled-tv-coming-to-u-s-next-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/12/11/sonys-super-slim-oled-tv-coming-to-u-s-next-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[30,000 hours is almost 4 years.  So if the TV is on for 8 hours per day it would last about 12 years.  I suspect that most people don't keep their TVs that long anyway.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kent]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Dec 27th 2007 9:44AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on ]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/12/11/sonys-super-slim-oled-tv-coming-to-u-s-next-year/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/12/11/sonys-super-slim-oled-tv-coming-to-u-s-next-year/</guid><description><![CDATA[Motorola's "NED" was actually an "FED"--Field Emission display--tiny emitters formed millions of cathodes that sprayed electrons to a phosphor screen only a few millimeters away. It was lke packing a million tiny CRTs together, and would have given a CRT-like image. Scientists still believe that emissive displays--like CRTs and PDPs (plasma) are more acceptable to the eye. Thus, the enthusiasm for OLED.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Holzel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jan 11th 2008 9:53AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>