<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Switched - Comments for Woman to Appeal $220,000 Music Sharing Verdict</title>
<link>http://www.switched.com/2007/10/09/woman-to-appeal-220-000-music-sharing-verdict/</link>
<description>Switched Comments for Woman to Appeal $220,000 Music Sharing Verdict</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Woman to Appeal $220,000 Music Sharing Verdict]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/10/09/woman-to-appeal-220-000-music-sharing-verdict/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/10/09/woman-to-appeal-220-000-music-sharing-verdict/</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow, now that's what I call being a bully!  How does one justify 24 songs as being worth $220,000???  That doesn't make sense! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jodi]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 9th 2007 12:17PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Woman to Appeal $220,000 Music Sharing Verdict]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/10/09/woman-to-appeal-220-000-music-sharing-verdict/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/10/09/woman-to-appeal-220-000-music-sharing-verdict/</guid><description><![CDATA[Get a real job to support your children!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[ms. garner]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 9th 2007 12:39PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Woman to Appeal $220,000 Music Sharing Verdict]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/10/09/woman-to-appeal-220-000-music-sharing-verdict/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/10/09/woman-to-appeal-220-000-music-sharing-verdict/</guid><description><![CDATA[Good for you lady, don't back down!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 9th 2007 2:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Woman to Appeal $220,000 Music Sharing Verdict]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/10/09/woman-to-appeal-220-000-music-sharing-verdict/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/10/09/woman-to-appeal-220-000-music-sharing-verdict/</guid><description><![CDATA[That's what you call making a big ole example out this person. Come on... 220K for 24 songs, thats almost 1K for each song, that seems criminal to me. If it's so illegal, how was she able to share these songs.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Regina Greene]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 9th 2007 5:48PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Woman to Appeal $220,000 Music Sharing Verdict]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/10/09/woman-to-appeal-220-000-music-sharing-verdict/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/10/09/woman-to-appeal-220-000-music-sharing-verdict/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ask the Ottumwa Iowa scum who they found to poison the Tylenol back in the early 80's.<br><br>Who cares who sues, gets paid. It's all scum. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 9th 2007 9:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Woman to Appeal $220,000 Music Sharing Verdict]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/10/09/woman-to-appeal-220-000-music-sharing-verdict/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/10/09/woman-to-appeal-220-000-music-sharing-verdict/</guid><description><![CDATA[Puke in the music business, pukes who buy and listen, to include legal and illegal downloads. <br><br>The whole mess are scum. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 9th 2007 9:28PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Woman to Appeal $220,000 Music Sharing Verdict]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/10/09/woman-to-appeal-220-000-music-sharing-verdict/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/10/09/woman-to-appeal-220-000-music-sharing-verdict/</guid><description><![CDATA[Regina Greene... 10K  Get the math right.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Klaus]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 10th 2007 11:32AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Woman to Appeal $220,000 Music Sharing Verdict]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/10/09/woman-to-appeal-220-000-music-sharing-verdict/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/10/09/woman-to-appeal-220-000-music-sharing-verdict/</guid><description><![CDATA[This lady is a loser.  Granted that the punishment hardly fits the crime but she's still a thief.  Her rationalizations are mostly embarassing.  It is because of the actions of people like Ms. Thomas that the music industry is going out of business and why we all suffer from that.  I wonder if she's taught her children that stealing is justified.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Luke Alberts]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 10th 2007 12:29PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Woman to Appeal $220,000 Music Sharing Verdict]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/10/09/woman-to-appeal-220-000-music-sharing-verdict/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/10/09/woman-to-appeal-220-000-music-sharing-verdict/</guid><description><![CDATA[This is a case of bullying. There is no way this lady can be blamed for causing the music industry to lose money. The people they should be going after are all the bootleggers that sell CDs and movies and the companies (limewire is one of many) that offer freeware, once again FREEware (stressing FREE) to download music. Yeah limewire asks is you intend to use their product for infringment and if you select yes, it won't allow  you to download. But with a quick page refresh you can select yes and download the software. Yes i have limewire, no i don't share any of my files, it gives me the option to share my folders or not. I still buy music from the stores if its an artist that i really like and respect their work. Other artist will get downloaded if i think their CD will be crap, why spend $10-$14 on crap? <br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[james]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 11th 2007 11:11AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Woman to Appeal $220,000 Music Sharing Verdict]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/10/09/woman-to-appeal-220-000-music-sharing-verdict/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/10/09/woman-to-appeal-220-000-music-sharing-verdict/</guid><description><![CDATA[How is downloading/bootlegging/sampling not stealing?  James, your argument that it's otherwise Okay to dowload a cd because most of the songs are crap is bizarre.  Is it okay to steal a loaf of white bread just because I prefer wheat?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Luke Alberts]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 10th 2007 4:10PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Woman to Appeal $220,000 Music Sharing Verdict]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/10/09/woman-to-appeal-220-000-music-sharing-verdict/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/10/09/woman-to-appeal-220-000-music-sharing-verdict/</guid><description><![CDATA[Ay Luke, ur right...it aint okay to steal a loaf of bread...but u aint gona get hit wit a $250,000 dollar fine for stealing bread. People like you are unbelievable luke. You aint going what she's going through thats why its so easy for you to judge harshly, and I dont care what you say you aint no angel. No matter what you say, you've cheated, lied, and stole in your lifetime so relax. I live in California, and if I got caught with 20 pounds of marijuana I wouldnt have to pay half of what they want her to pay for 24 songs....now thats bizarre. Why do you care about the music industry so much neway luke? If I really wanted to I could get on limewire and find upcoming songs that havent even been released to the public yet...Where do these leaks come from smart guy?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nino]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 11th 2007 5:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Woman to Appeal $220,000 Music Sharing Verdict]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/10/09/woman-to-appeal-220-000-music-sharing-verdict/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/10/09/woman-to-appeal-220-000-music-sharing-verdict/</guid><description><![CDATA[Even if those 24 songs were gold or platinum records, they still wouldn't be worth $220,000.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 10th 2007 7:47PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Woman to Appeal $220,000 Music Sharing Verdict]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/10/09/woman-to-appeal-220-000-music-sharing-verdict/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/10/09/woman-to-appeal-220-000-music-sharing-verdict/</guid><description><![CDATA[If the woman bought CDSingles or a CD's or ripped CDs and shared them, the music industry has no way of detecting it. But because she downloaded the songs and shared them over the network, the music industry is able to detect it and it's a crime (at least according to them). ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 10th 2007 7:41PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Woman to Appeal $220,000 Music Sharing Verdict]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/10/09/woman-to-appeal-220-000-music-sharing-verdict/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/10/09/woman-to-appeal-220-000-music-sharing-verdict/</guid><description><![CDATA[Although I think that stealing is wrong, I do believe that this punishment was way to harsh! That is too much money for 24 songs. She should just pay what you would normally pay to download a song.  I think that she has learned a valuable lesson. I'm not hating on her because I'm no angel myself. I do  believe that she is being unfairly punished. She should'n have to pay for somebody's new car just cuz she downloaded a few songs.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Taryn]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 10th 2007 7:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Woman to Appeal $220,000 Music Sharing Verdict]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/10/09/woman-to-appeal-220-000-music-sharing-verdict/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/10/09/woman-to-appeal-220-000-music-sharing-verdict/</guid><description><![CDATA[ Hey Regina Green...Do the math. It's not almost $1K per song, it's almost $9,200 per song, and that's really outrageous]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[MrFixIt]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 10th 2007 7:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Woman to Appeal $220,000 Music Sharing Verdict]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/10/09/woman-to-appeal-220-000-music-sharing-verdict/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/10/09/woman-to-appeal-220-000-music-sharing-verdict/</guid><description><![CDATA[While downloading and sharing is illegal the music industry is picking on the wrong people.Go after the facilitators instead.It is about time the music industr offers the consumer value for their money.One can purchase a CD for $13-18 and get onlt one track worth listening to but the consumer has no remedy.In my view that is fraud but that id just my opinion.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Erwin  Stoessel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 10th 2007 9:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Woman to Appeal $220,000 Music Sharing Verdict]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/10/09/woman-to-appeal-220-000-music-sharing-verdict/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/10/09/woman-to-appeal-220-000-music-sharing-verdict/</guid><description><![CDATA[she SOLD each one of those 24 songs about 1000 times each. That is why the high fine. Read the stories!!!<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kevin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 10th 2007 9:12PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Woman to Appeal $220,000 Music Sharing Verdict]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/10/09/woman-to-appeal-220-000-music-sharing-verdict/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/10/09/woman-to-appeal-220-000-music-sharing-verdict/</guid><description><![CDATA[As A much downloaded musician who needs a second job to support the free music many enjoy,I feel it is my right as such to get free photography,free software,free design plans,free clothing designs that I do have made,and any other itelectual property created by anyone anywhere who has an original idea. Tit for tat,you my creations for free I get whatever I want including the rights to patent it if you didnt. Thanks yall! I am looking at deals now from several investors in "my inventions!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris C]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 10th 2007 11:34PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Woman to Appeal $220,000 Music Sharing Verdict]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/10/09/woman-to-appeal-220-000-music-sharing-verdict/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/10/09/woman-to-appeal-220-000-music-sharing-verdict/</guid><description><![CDATA[Check this out! I can now share with you patterns of 4 major dress designers !! I HAVE the patterns and the link to the fabric supplier in downtown LA!! You girls would love some 480.00 jeams for 30.00 bucks a pair,CUSTOM MADE!! Email me for the FREE patterns and a tailoring shop near 9th and maple in downtown LA! Also 16 different dollbaby tops and where to get the fabrics way cheap. These are 165 to 350 dollar tops.15.00 each custom made 4 U!!]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris C]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 10th 2007 11:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Woman to Appeal $220,000 Music Sharing Verdict]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/10/09/woman-to-appeal-220-000-music-sharing-verdict/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/10/09/woman-to-appeal-220-000-music-sharing-verdict/</guid><description><![CDATA[Also free patterns size oo to size 20 (damm thats big!) "boyfriend cut" whatever that is,baggy i think,360.00 a pair on line, major designer including back pocket cut and stitch,dye lot# of denim,the supplier, and the patterns in most sizes,location of big sewing shop in downtown LA to make all you need to "share with your friends",Got some custom hame plans too,FREE! more later! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris C]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 10th 2007 11:56PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
