Switched Archives
June 2012
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
Blackberry 101 | Best Tablets | Best iPhone 4 Case | Color App | Facebook Questions | NCAA Brackets | Lady Gaga at Google | Facebook Deals | Animated GIF | Anonymous | Amazon Appstore | April Fools' Day | Google Blogger | Rebecca Black Friday | Nintendo 3DS | Vimeo iPhone App | Video Game Emulators | Private Browsing | Mark Bao | Julian Assange | What is 4G? | Bronx Zoo Cobra | iPad 2 Review | Google 1 | New York Times Paywall
- Warren Riddle
Listening to Ra, glance at the notes and there's @AliveRecords. Nice cover, Mr. Boissel! @TheGloryFires #magiccityjams http://t.co/uT0M77VJ
- Leila Brillson
I do not want this.
- Joshua Fruhlinger
Misconceptions about LA. Interesting read, but kinda whiney. http://t.co/jEqHw3ts
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
(Unverified)Sep 23rd 2007 1:48PM
As is too often true, the headline steers the reader towards an idea that is never stated in the article.
The article talks about UNSOLVED crimes, without saying a word about the crime rate per se. If there have been less crimes since cameras were put up, then, yes, cameras would be having an impact on crime whether or not the crimes that are still committed get solved. But we don't know if that's the case or not.
The article is about clear-up rates, not the rise or decline in crimes actually committed. The headline screams out a conclusion that has nothing to do with the article that follows.