<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Switched - Comments for Surveillance Cams Don't Reduce Crime, Study Finds</title>
<link>http://www.switched.com/2007/09/21/surveillance-cams-dont-reduce-crime-study-finds/</link>
<description>Switched Comments for Surveillance Cams Don't Reduce Crime, Study Finds</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Surveillance Cams Don't Reduce Crime, Study Finds]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/09/21/surveillance-cams-dont-reduce-crime-study-finds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/09/21/surveillance-cams-dont-reduce-crime-study-finds/</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, I think it would reduce some of it… but true, not as much as it should…. Maybe they should simply think about a better way to improve police services than spend money on stuff like this.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[virtual office]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Feb 11th 2008 7:19PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Surveillance Cams Don't Reduce Crime, Study Finds]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/09/21/surveillance-cams-dont-reduce-crime-study-finds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/09/21/surveillance-cams-dont-reduce-crime-study-finds/</guid><description><![CDATA[I came across smsVideoGuard.com<br>These people view your cctv cameras for you at as low as $1/camera/day<br>This is exactly the kind of services that are needed in conjunction with owning the cameras.<br>The service relies on broadband. Some will say that internet itself is unreliable. Well that is true. But with improving broadband and higher speeds, this is a real option.<br><br>Well I found it.. so I shared. Hope it helps someone.<br><br>Happy Carpooling<br>TeaCii]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[TeaCii]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mar 21st 2010 12:56AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Surveillance Cams Don't Reduce Crime, Study Finds]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/09/21/surveillance-cams-dont-reduce-crime-study-finds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/09/21/surveillance-cams-dont-reduce-crime-study-finds/</guid><description><![CDATA[But we can watch them and they can be sold to news people and people can make money. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[hull]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Oct 5th 2007 9:38PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Surveillance Cams Don't Reduce Crime, Study Finds]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/09/21/surveillance-cams-dont-reduce-crime-study-finds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/09/21/surveillance-cams-dont-reduce-crime-study-finds/</guid><description><![CDATA[As is too often true, the headline steers the reader towards an idea that is never stated in the article.<br><br>The article talks about UNSOLVED crimes, without saying a word about the crime rate per se. If there have been less crimes since cameras were put up, then, yes, cameras would be having an impact on crime whether or not the crimes that are still committed get solved. But we don't know if that's the case or not.<br><br>The article is about clear-up rates, not the rise or decline in crimes actually committed. The headline screams out a conclusion that has nothing to do with the article that follows.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Chevallier]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sep 23rd 2007 1:48PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
