Peek Inside the Gigantic Airbus A380
Want to step aboard the spankin' new, Godzilla-sized Airbus A380, but don't have a trip planned on Korean Air anytime soon? No worries. Aving.net has you covered with a full-blown photo tour of the new planes, including shots of the cockpit, wine bar, first class accommodations and even the latrines.
We do not recommend this photo gallery to anyone about to board one of the sardine-cans-with-wings we're stuck with here in the U.S.
From Aving.net
Related Links:
- Sneak Peek at Virgin America's New High-Tech Planes
- American, Lufthansa Adding In-Flight Wi-Fi
- United Adds Cool New Gadgets to First and Business Class






Whitney Houston Dead: Singer Dies at 48, Body Found in Beverly Hilton Hotel
Whitney Houston Autopsy: Cause of Death Determined?
Whitney Houston, Bobbi Kristina: Late Singer's Daughter Hospitalized
Whitney Houston Dead: Stars React to Legend's Sudden Death
Adele Five-Year Break? Singer Plans to Focus on Relationship, Write 'Happy Record'
Jennifer Hudson Whitney Tribute: Grammy President Reveals Why Singer Was Chosen for Musical Memorial
Grammy 2012 Winners' List: Adele Sweeps Music's Biggest Night
5-Hour Energy: A Success Equal Parts Caffeine, Chemistry and Meditation
3 Economic Misconceptions That Need to Die
People With Easy-To-Pronounce Names More Likely To Succeed, Study Says















Comments
5
Subscribe to commentsG.L.Feb 4th 2008 8:06PM
When you look at the black and white films of the Wright brothers making their first attempts at flight,it is absolutely stunning that humans have evolved this far.
Philip RichardsFeb 4th 2008 10:02PM
The way the US airlines are operated, the poor customers have no recourse whatsoever. If you make a stink at ther ticket counter with a legitimate complaint, you will very quickly find yourself being arrested, or escorted out of the terminal. This is wrong, the customer should be entitled to more courteous consideration.
AND, none of the airlines seem to know how to stay in the 'black' instead of the 'red'!
carriebnarryFeb 5th 2008 11:27AM
It appears to be dripping in feminity with pastel colors. People under 5'6" will find it comfortable .
David T. CondraMar 27th 2008 4:39PM
Now if Korean Air can just stop crashing jets. Over a period of almost a decade spanning the 1990s they had one major aircraft loss per year resulting in hundreds of death. Yes, American airlines are the most comfortable (even Continental has a ways to go) but at least they don't crash into mountain sides in Guam or run off the runways in Soeul - be careful what you wish for...
Bernard I. TurnoyOct 6th 2007 11:39PM
Those are interesting photographs of the Korean Air configuration of the A380 that have been posted; of course, looking at the 1st class and business class seating, I couldn't help but think of the aging MD80's and 757's of American Airlines that I've recently flown in. In the past year I've flown from Chicago to Puerto Vallarta, Mexico; from Chicago to New York's LaGuardia, from Chicago to San Juan, et al. Even seated in the 'best' class of service of those aircraft, they are - quite simply, thoroughly antiquated. The quality of the 'complimentary' ear phones on those flights was such that they actually hurt one's ears. There were no seatback video displays, no wifi and the lavatory facilities up front were being used by those seated aft.
While it's one thing to have to take an aged MD80 for a couple of hours to New York, it's quite another for flights in excess of four hours. On longer routes - where competition abounds, such as the trans-Atlantic and/or trans-Pacific routes, the offerings are many and the ammenities correspondingly provided. Nevertheless, it appears that air-travel is quickly going the way of most services, such being a two tier approach. They'll pack the average flying public into steerage, charge fees for all services formerly provided as a courtesy and those who can/choose to anti-up can either fly business/1st class only flights, or continue to pay absurdly high ticket prices for the front rows on legacy carriers. What I don't comprehend is why American taxpayers are paying for the expansion of our airports and infrastructure to accommodate the A380? After all, those footing those bills aren't likely to ever see any direct benefit from facilitating the European's venture into North America - a venture that competes directly with our home grown Boeing.
It's my understanding that United Airlines hasn't ordered any new aircraft {with their fleet aging faster than any of the other legacy carriers} and, even if they were to do so now, the backlogs at Boeing for their 787's would put United well into the 2015 time frame before they could begin to take delivery. Despite living in realtively close proximity to Chicago's O'Hare Airport, the lock that American and/or United have on this key North American hub is in the area of 80%. This hardly makes for competition in one of the world's major aviation markets.
Perhaps when the business class only start-ups expand into Chicago {whether it be at Midway, Milwaukee's Mitchell Field, Palwuakee in Wheeling, or elsewhere, the legacy carriers will have to produce a product corresponding with their price points. In the meantime, those of us in Chicago not flying on private aircraft will have to continue to pay for the expansion of O'Hare, to deal with the regional traffic issues, to pay the price for the lack of competition and to have to endure travel on antiquated aircraft.
Frankly, I think it's high time we expended our tax dollars into a naitonal grid of high speed rail service. Now, there's something to think about.