Worst Airbrushed Celebs of 2007 ... So Far
Our last and most egregious Photoshop job of the lot comes courtesy of weekly trashloid, Star Magazine, which manipulated this image of Jennifer Aniston to completely fabricate a story. Sure, on the Star cover it's not such a stretch to believe that Aniston could be delivering a tell-all manuscript to her book publisher -- a manuscript that would expose the gory details of her relationship with Brad Pitt.
But, wait just a minute. In the original, un-retouched photo uncovered by Radar magazine's Web site we see that it's not a manuscript at all that Aniston is holding, but a catalog for an auction she was attending. Shame on you, Star.
Related Links:
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 5)
virginia @ Sep 2nd 2007 7:22AM
whats the big deal? she still looks great! are you jealous?
Aura @ Sep 2nd 2007 7:25AM
hahahahahahahaha
and THIS is why i NEVER trust damn gossip magazines.
Laurie @ Sep 2nd 2007 7:34AM
This picture is not about if Jennifer looks great or not, it's about the fact that the "catalog" she's holding is re-done so they could make up a story.
Charles @ Sep 2nd 2007 8:07AM
The best response is to refraim from buying all those media publications using airbrushing who are passing themselves off as legitimate media.
theonewhodoesn'tcare @ Sep 2nd 2007 8:18AM
OMG people who cares if she does write a book I for one wouldn't be reading it, like I would really want to know the details of a marriage that failed. Suprise even jennifer Anniston is human and has flaws
jan @ Sep 2nd 2007 8:18AM
Just don't buy the tabloids, this is making it profitable for people to be doing this.
Willow @ Sep 2nd 2007 8:20AM
Again, like Tony Blair, I see no difference!!
caitengl @ Sep 2nd 2007 8:28AM
I wish someone would photoshop me. It would be nice to see what I would look like if I were the perfect me.
Karen Yocom @ Sep 2nd 2007 8:40AM
This is just a tiny bit of the BS we're fed by the media. Imagine what we're missing from the political scene when millions of dollars of campaign money is spent on PR.
andria @ Sep 2nd 2007 8:48AM
I believe that serious airbrushing happens routinely. I believe that close-up face shots of celebrities are manipulated. However, these shots look pretty much the same to me. Faith Hill was the only one where I could tell any difference, and she still looked fantastic to begin with. Probably a picture of Beyonce would be more telling.
pat @ Sep 2nd 2007 8:56AM
who cares? If Jennifer Aniston is not in the tabloids, what else is she doing? She's become a 'tabloid celebrity' that all!
Sondra @ Sep 2nd 2007 8:58AM
I see no difference in the appearance of any of the people in the photos except the tennis guy and Faith Hill, and that is a HUGE difference, though she is still beautiful. Different camera angles, lighting or shadows yes, airbrushing anyone else, no.
This whole story sounds like it was taken from the same trash magazine that tried to make Jennifer Aniston look bad.
Kenny48 @ Sep 2nd 2007 9:06AM
I've known about airbrushed photos for about 20 years now. I guess I can thank Playboy for that. They don't fool me, but alot of insecure, naive people might think that they have to look this good. Here's a bit of free advice; No one looks as good as that in real life. Its our imperfections that makes us appealing.
randy @ Sep 2nd 2007 9:08AM
This whole article fucking sucks, there is no difference in any of the picks you showed, must have been a really slow day.
ajlerner @ Sep 2nd 2007 9:21AM
Jen writing a book??? That's probably one more book than she's read.
John F.C. Taylor @ Sep 2nd 2007 9:23AM
Unfortunately, all too many people want to believe in the air brushed version of things regardless of what the truth is. Rather disappointing and time wasting to be presented with fewer and fewer opportunities for us to view reality and judge for ourselves.
Terry Matlen @ Sep 2nd 2007 9:36AM
I wonder how many celebs sue for being made to look better than they really are. Hmmm...
www.addconsults.com
www.myADDstore.com
awcooter @ Sep 2nd 2007 9:38AM
not much difference in any of these photo's except faith hill, but she still look's great! by the way guy's, those women in playboy, penthouse etc... are airbrushed to th max, so your wife or girlfreind probably look just as good. dream on!!!
Chedda @ Sep 2nd 2007 9:39AM
Shame on you "Star" Magazine...lol
LIZ @ Sep 2nd 2007 9:48AM
BS.... most of those are photoshoped to look ugly & good. Both of Faith Hill & the Harry Potter shot were both photoshoped to appear unattractive & perfect.