Worst Airbrushed Celebs of 2007 ... So Far

Related Links:







CNET provides the latest tech news, unbiased reviews, videos, podcasts, software, and downloads, making tech products easy to find, understand and use.
Definitive Technology BPX
Works great with Dolby Pro Logic and Dolby Digital. Full Review
KEF KHT-3005 (black)
The KEF KHT-3005 is one compact, beautifully designed speaker package with solid aluminum satellites that feature unique driver technology to produce incredible clarity. Meanwhile, the equally astounding dual 10-inch, 250-watt powered subwoofer delivers ultradeep bass. Full Review
KEF KHT-3005 (silver)
The KEF KHT-3005 is one compact, beautifully designed speaker package with solid aluminum satellites that feature unique driver technology to produce incredible clarity. Meanwhile, the equally astounding dual 10-inch, 250-watt powered subwoofer delivers ultradeep bass. Full Review
Pioneer Kuro PDP-5080 HD
This 50-inch plasma TV displays an exceedingly deep shade of black with excellent shadow detail; clean image with little noise; "smooth" video-processing mode removes most judder; excellent antireflective screen; sleek, minimalist styling; removable speaker; superb connectivity with four HDMI inputs and one PC input; CableCard compatible with TV Guide EPG. Full Review
Sony VPL-VW200
This projector has exceptional color fidelity. It produces a deep shade of black with excellent shadow detail. It also has a superb feature package, including panel alignment and blacking, and it has solid connectivity. Full Review
Logitech Squeezebox Duet
Network digital audio system includes excellent wireless remote with color screen and scroll wheel control; supports Wi-Fi and Ethernet home networks; compatible with virtually all non-DRM audio file formats, provides access to PC-based music files (on Windows, Mac, and Linux machines) as well as PC-free Internet radio, podcasts, and premium online music services including Rhapsody, Slacker, and Pandora; excellent online account integration; expandable to multiple rooms. Full Review
Wi-Ex zBoost YX510-PCS-CEL cell phone signal extender
The Wi-Ex zBoost YX510-PCS-CEL significantly boosts your cell phone reception and is easy to operate. Also, it uses a wireless connection to your phone. Full Review
Turbo Charge Tc2 portable cell phone charger
The Turbo Charge Tc2 portable cell phone charger successfully delivers emergency power to your cell phone. It's easy to use and comes with a couple of surprising features. Full Review
Sony Ericsson K800i Cyber-shot (Unlocked)
The Sony Ericsson K800i offers solid features, superior photo quality, and excellent performance in a sharp, eye-catching package. Full Review
Canon EOS 1D Mark III
Extremely fast, 10-megapixel continuous shooting; very low noise; highly customizable; well-designed body with weather sealing; 3-inch LCD; abundant optional accessories. Full Review
Canon EOS-1D Mark II N
Combination of fast drive mode and high resolution; large buffer; highly customizable; saves custom camera setups to media, supports cards greater than 2GB. Full Review
Canon EOS-1Ds Mark III
Very low noise, high quality images; 21.1 megapixels; live view shooting; pro-level build-quality and performance. Full Review
HP Pavilion Slimline S3330f
Outstanding price-to-feature ratio; Blu-ray/HD DVD combo drive; small, flexible case; great performance thanks to a speedy dual-core AMD CPU Full Review
Dell XPS 630
Fastest gaming performance in its price category (mostly); distinctive chassis; lots of expandability; Nvidia software makes overclocking easy. Full Review
Apple iMac (24-inch, 2.8GHz)
A minor specification update results in some significant performance gains; graphics upgrade an option on this 24-inch model; sleek, polished design didn't receive an update, but we won't start clamoring for a new design until the current one is at least 12 months old. Full Review
Other Weblogs Inc. Network blogs you might be interested in:
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 5)
virginia @ Sep 2nd 2007 7:22AM
whats the big deal? she still looks great! are you jealous?
Aura @ Sep 2nd 2007 7:25AM
hahahahahahahaha
and THIS is why i NEVER trust damn gossip magazines.
Laurie @ Sep 2nd 2007 7:34AM
This picture is not about if Jennifer looks great or not, it's about the fact that the "catalog" she's holding is re-done so they could make up a story.
Charles @ Sep 2nd 2007 8:07AM
The best response is to refraim from buying all those media publications using airbrushing who are passing themselves off as legitimate media.
theonewhodoesn'tcare @ Sep 2nd 2007 8:18AM
OMG people who cares if she does write a book I for one wouldn't be reading it, like I would really want to know the details of a marriage that failed. Suprise even jennifer Anniston is human and has flaws
jan @ Sep 2nd 2007 8:18AM
Just don't buy the tabloids, this is making it profitable for people to be doing this.
Willow @ Sep 2nd 2007 8:20AM
Again, like Tony Blair, I see no difference!!
caitengl @ Sep 2nd 2007 8:28AM
I wish someone would photoshop me. It would be nice to see what I would look like if I were the perfect me.
Karen Yocom @ Sep 2nd 2007 8:40AM
This is just a tiny bit of the BS we're fed by the media. Imagine what we're missing from the political scene when millions of dollars of campaign money is spent on PR.
andria @ Sep 2nd 2007 8:48AM
I believe that serious airbrushing happens routinely. I believe that close-up face shots of celebrities are manipulated. However, these shots look pretty much the same to me. Faith Hill was the only one where I could tell any difference, and she still looked fantastic to begin with. Probably a picture of Beyonce would be more telling.
pat @ Sep 2nd 2007 8:56AM
who cares? If Jennifer Aniston is not in the tabloids, what else is she doing? She's become a 'tabloid celebrity' that all!
Sondra @ Sep 2nd 2007 8:58AM
I see no difference in the appearance of any of the people in the photos except the tennis guy and Faith Hill, and that is a HUGE difference, though she is still beautiful. Different camera angles, lighting or shadows yes, airbrushing anyone else, no.
This whole story sounds like it was taken from the same trash magazine that tried to make Jennifer Aniston look bad.
Kenny48 @ Sep 2nd 2007 9:06AM
I've known about airbrushed photos for about 20 years now. I guess I can thank Playboy for that. They don't fool me, but alot of insecure, naive people might think that they have to look this good. Here's a bit of free advice; No one looks as good as that in real life. Its our imperfections that makes us appealing.
randy @ Sep 2nd 2007 9:08AM
This whole article fucking sucks, there is no difference in any of the picks you showed, must have been a really slow day.
ajlerner @ Sep 2nd 2007 9:21AM
Jen writing a book??? That's probably one more book than she's read.
John F.C. Taylor @ Sep 2nd 2007 9:23AM
Unfortunately, all too many people want to believe in the air brushed version of things regardless of what the truth is. Rather disappointing and time wasting to be presented with fewer and fewer opportunities for us to view reality and judge for ourselves.
Terry Matlen @ Sep 2nd 2007 9:36AM
I wonder how many celebs sue for being made to look better than they really are. Hmmm...
www.addconsults.com
www.myADDstore.com
awcooter @ Sep 2nd 2007 9:38AM
not much difference in any of these photo's except faith hill, but she still look's great! by the way guy's, those women in playboy, penthouse etc... are airbrushed to th max, so your wife or girlfreind probably look just as good. dream on!!!
Chedda @ Sep 2nd 2007 9:39AM
Shame on you "Star" Magazine...lol
LIZ @ Sep 2nd 2007 9:48AM
BS.... most of those are photoshoped to look ugly & good. Both of Faith Hill & the Harry Potter shot were both photoshoped to appear unattractive & perfect.