Facebook Forced To Let You Vote On Privacy Changes
What Will Google Announce Next Week?
Worst Airbrushed Celebs of 2007 ... So Far
When Harry Potter and his grown-up gang hit theaters earlier this year, Warner Bros. released a second, 3-D version of the flick to IMAX theaters which included a 20-minute extended finale. But that's not all Warner Bros. added. On the left, the above image shows the actors as they appeared on the movie poster for the original cut of the movie, while the right side shows how Emma Watson appeared on the poster for the IMAX version. My my, how Hermione has grown!
Watson's plumped chest lit message boards ablaze Internet-wide, primarily due to her young age (17), and the fact that audiences had watched her grow up on screen. Warner Bros. never commented on Boobgate, though this rather lengthy denial/explanation appeared on a random blog and claims that this resulted from the practice of using two different cameras to simultaneously film for IMAX.
40 Years Later 'Napalm Girl' Tells Her Story
Disney World Scammers Scored Four Years of Free Vacations
Lost Dr. Seuss Cartoons Show Another Side Of The Author
Stranger's Kiss Keeps 16-Year-Old From Committing Suicide
Rookie Cop Reportedly Berated, Called 'A Rat' For Arresting Off-Duty Officer
Zhang Ziyi Slams Prostitution Allegations
Walmart Ending Membership in Conservative Group
Apple CEO Tim Cook interview at D10: the liveblog
Disturbing Video Allegedly Shows Montreal Torso Suspect Murdering Victim
How I Went Bankrupt at 23
Can a New Guy Save Best Buy?
Chain Food Showdown: The Best & Worst Buffalo Wings
Woman Claims Kangaroo Stalked Her for 2 Days, Then Attacked
Facebook, Week Two: Fortunes Made and Fortunes Lost (Mostly Lost)
Student Ate Roommate's Brain And Heart, Cops Say
A Journey To The Hottest Place On Earth: Dallol Ethiopia
PHOTOS: Charlize Theron's Short And Shoulder-Baring Style
Heidi Klum's Sexiest (And Scariest) Outfits
Maine Police Believe Ayla Reynolds Is Dead
LOOK: Photos Of Military Moms Breastfeeding In Uniform Cause Controversy
George Zimmerman's Bond Revoked
National Spelling Bee Winner Is I-M-P-R-E-S-S-I-V-E
Witherspoon Bigamy Case Heats Up
Is Kate Walsh Leaving 'Private Practice' Next Season?
Calif. Man Becomes Internet Sensation In China For Random Act Of Kindness
Space Agency Predicts Date Of World-Ending Galactic Smash-Up
See Kim Without Her Wig On 'Don't Be Tardy For The Wedding'
Kansas Police Search For 12-Year-Old Girl Who Disappeared With Canadian She Met Online
Is This The Most Timeless Hairstyle, Ever?
New Discovery Sheds Light On Amelia Earhart Mystery
Jim Moret: 'Still The Most Beautiful Girl I've Ever Seen'
The Coolest Movie Posters You've Never Seen
Comments
28
Subscribe to commentswandaSep 6th 2007 12:45AM
Soooooooooooo, who cares?
SummerBreezez252Sep 6th 2007 8:33PM
you know? it just seems that one was just a poster that was made, as in painted or something...the other looks like a photo....though i still don't understand why emma is the only one who looks completely photoshopped(or whatever you want to call it)in the left picture..
Annette HarveySep 6th 2007 9:47PM
You can look at the stripes on her sweater and tell for sure that her breasts aren't airbrushed to look larger. The stripes are in the same place. If one picture had larger breasts, the stripes wouldn't match the other picture. Those that said her stomach was scooped a little are right in my opinion. That's what may cause some eyes to think she is larger in that picture.. though no one seems to think it from the comments. What bothers me is this... The whole airburshing article is stupid\...., other then Faith Hill, no onle really looks different and the picture of Ms Watson is just causing millions of people to stare at her breasts. How embarrassing for her. I say shame on "Switched" for the erroneous article, and aol for publishing it.
RicciSep 6th 2007 10:28PM
cmon it's a different photo look at her shoulder it's at a different angle.
randy claytonSep 8th 2007 2:07PM
Anyone that would actually spend money for a tabloid helps to perpetuate pure BS such as this.
That is just plain stupid. Those folks definitely need a life preserver in their gene pool.
DavidSep 10th 2007 8:03PM
AOL had the same stuff on recently. Have they run out of material? Nothing new here. I wish they would show Goldie Hawn, Pamela Anderson, and that other host of "beauties" without makeup. Talk about gross! You would not believe what dogs they really are.
gawkerSep 11th 2007 7:37AM
they are liars.....that is a touch up 110% sure!
can't they even tell the truth when they get busted?
MARYSep 11th 2007 9:36AM
WHATEVER HAPPENED TO JUST BEING NATURAL?? IM SO SICK OF THE FAKE BEAUTY, FITNESS, PERFECTION BSHT. OUR SOCIETY MAKES EVERYONE NEUROTIC, TRYING TO BE LIKE THESE FAKE CELEBRITIES. NO WONDER SO MANY PEOPLE HAVE ISSUES!! IT JUST GOES TO SHOW THEY ARE JUST LIKE US. AND ONLY HAVE THE OPTION FOR CHANGE, RE PLASTIC SURGERY OR WHATEVER, BECAUSE THEY HAVE THE BIG BUCKS.
HOWEVER, THEY DONT HAVE THE BEAUTY ON THE INSIDE AS MOST NATURAL NON-VAIN PEOPLE DO.