Teen Guilty of Recording Movie with Digicam
We were somewhat disturbed earlier this month to learn that a 19-year-old girl was charged with a misdemeanor crime for filming 20 seconds of 'Transformers' on her digital camera. She was shocked to find herself facing a $2,500 fine plus a year in prison for her crime, and, frankly, so were we. We are happy to report that she won't be seeing any jail time and her savings are safe. She did plead guilty, but won't face jail time. She was ordered to pay a $71 court fee and the misdemeanor will be removed from her record in 12 months.
From Wired's Threat Level
Related Links:
- Teen Faces Jail Time for 20-Second 'Transformers' Recording
- MPAA Sets Up Fake Site to Lure Pirates
- Robbing DVDs Gets a Little Bit Harder





Whitney Houston Autopsy: Cause of Death Determined?
Whitney Houston, Bobbi Kristina: Late Singer's Daughter Hospitalized
Adele Five-Year Break? Singer Plans to Focus on Relationship, Write 'Happy Record'
Jennifer Hudson Whitney Tribute: Grammy President Reveals Why Singer Was Chosen for Musical Memorial
Grammy 2012 Winners' List: Adele Sweeps Music's Biggest Night
3 Economic Misconceptions That Need to Die
5-Hour Energy: A Success Equal Parts Caffeine, Chemistry and Meditation
People With Easy-To-Pronounce Names More Likely To Succeed, Study Says
Whitney Houston Dead: Stars React to Legend's Sudden Death
Katy Perry Grammy Performance 2012: Did the Diva Diss Her Ex-Hubby With Revealing New Song?














Comments
2
Subscribe to commentsDaveApr 15th 2009 2:44PM
Funny how so many people don't know anything about law and how many of those want to use the law vindictively against a person who had NO CRIMINAL INTENT - which is the legal requirement for a CRIMINAL charge vs. a civil court matter, where damages usually exceed any criminal fines. Intent is the critical element. Some people and companies just love to come down hard on others, but, of course, they are exempt if ever they get in trouble.
Taxpayers pay for prosecutions of criminal charges, the fines seldom cover the expense, whereas in civil cases, the loser has to pay for all costs plus damages, taxpayers pay zero. But Regal Cinema wants to use taxpayer money to sic police on people to scare them rather than collect damages that would far exceed any criminal fine. And Regal didn't collect a dime of that fine. And in this nation of vengeance seekers, where we put a much greater percentage of people in prison than any other country, its a lot more fun to threaten people who innocently do foolish things with prison, isn't it? It's interesting to read the comment of a vindictive hypocrite who sees things arbitrarily with zero understanding of criminal law vs. civil law to see why prisons are so full of warehoused inmates, provided with zero rehabilitation and instead learn crime, who leave prison with hatred on their minds. This was a civil matter, only prosecuted under pressure from a vindictive, malicious, powerful company which deserves to go out of business.
DAve
MikeAug 22nd 2007 3:19PM
No cameras means no cameras! Guilty!