<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Switched - Comments for Kodak's New $100 5 Megapixel Cam</title>
<link>http://www.switched.com/2007/07/24/kodaks-new-100-5-megapixel-cam/</link>
<description>Switched Comments for Kodak's New $100 5 Megapixel Cam</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak's New $100 5 Megapixel Cam]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/07/24/kodaks-new-100-5-megapixel-cam/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/07/24/kodaks-new-100-5-megapixel-cam/</guid><description><![CDATA[Kodak deserves success in this arena.  It has housed and clothed and fed thousands of Rochesterians for many years as it participated in the film business with quality.  It has been a humane and very professional firm that has treated employees with respect and kindness even while going through massive technology driven organizational change. Kodak has demanded  innovation and performance. Kodak deserves a win! I hope this camera is widely accepted. Way to go Kodak! ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bill kelly]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2007 5:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak's New $100 5 Megapixel Cam]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/07/24/kodaks-new-100-5-megapixel-cam/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/07/24/kodaks-new-100-5-megapixel-cam/</guid><description><![CDATA[If I base my opinion of Kodak on Mr. Kelley's comment, I might fail to remember that Kodak is the same company that unabashedly violated Polaroid's patent rights on instant cameras.  How does a company care for its employees when it breaks the law and has to pay millions of dollars to a competitor? ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Lawrence]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2007 7:03PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak's New $100 5 Megapixel Cam]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/07/24/kodaks-new-100-5-megapixel-cam/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/07/24/kodaks-new-100-5-megapixel-cam/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have used Kodak for all the photography on my website and found that they have been trying hard to catch up with the likes of Sony who have dominated the market.  The Cameras they are putting out now are really a great bang for the buck. I have a 10x optical zoom and have some great wildlife closeups and some great outdoors scenic pics.  <a href="http://www.cooper-dog.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.cooper-dog.com</a> also has some of the Kodak video.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Cooper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2007 7:04PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak's New $100 5 Megapixel Cam]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/07/24/kodaks-new-100-5-megapixel-cam/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/07/24/kodaks-new-100-5-megapixel-cam/</guid><description><![CDATA[I am both a working photographer and also in photo retail.<br><br>I was at one time a HUGE fan of anything and everything Kodak. No longer tho. (the reasons unecessary)<br><br>I work in the largest photo retail chain on the planet and Kodaks don't sell. And in my professional opinion both Kodak AND Sony are at the very bottom of the camera barrel. At least customer service wise. They are truly HORRIBLE in that. Outsourcing at it's best. Personally, I don't sell cameras, I sell knowledge and service, both of which you don't get from either of those two. Kodak dropped the ball years ago and Fuji picked it up and ran with it.<br><br>If you want a digital camera, buy one from people who MAKE cameras, not movies in hollyood, not watches, not keyboards, not boom boxes. <br><br>One simply cannot go wrong with the name(s) Canon, Nikon, Olympus or Pentax. And they speak ENGLISH when you call them.<br><br>There's NOTHING easy about easyshare cameras, thats nothing but someone at Kodak paying someone on Madison Ave., to create a buzzword.<br><br>Any and ALL digital cameras will be as easy or as difficult as the one buying it makes it. I see it day in and day out.<br><br>So keep buying your cameras in "convenient" places where you actually think your getting a good deal like KMart, Target, Sams Club, BestBuy & Circuit City.<br><br>I like that, czuase when ya have problems they always tell ya to go to a camera store. And I get to charge you $25.00 an hour or any part thereof for technical service and support.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2007 8:45PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak's New $100 5 Megapixel Cam]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/07/24/kodaks-new-100-5-megapixel-cam/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/07/24/kodaks-new-100-5-megapixel-cam/</guid><description><![CDATA[and furthermore, I'll have to go with mr lawrence there.<br><br>a) Kodak didn't jump in till way too late and catch up won't work for them.<br>b) Kodak makes dumb decisions, discontinuing GREAT film(s), back in the day - Royal Gold, Ektapress Professional 1600 et al<br>c) Kodak has FIRED 1,000's of employees worldwide in the last 7-8 years<br><br>Shall I continue? Nikon has a fabulous L10 5 meg camer for $119.00 which is usually on sale for $99.99, with a far superior optical glass lens.<br><br>Oh and that Kodah. Schneider lens? Not likely. Can you say lincensing agreement? Same with Sony ! NOT a Zeiss lens on those puppies either.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2007 8:53PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak's New $100 5 Megapixel Cam]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/07/24/kodaks-new-100-5-megapixel-cam/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/07/24/kodaks-new-100-5-megapixel-cam/</guid><description><![CDATA[Hey, at least camera prices are starting to go down! Remember how expensive they used to be?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Christian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 24th 2007 10:05PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak's New $100 5 Megapixel Cam]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/07/24/kodaks-new-100-5-megapixel-cam/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/07/24/kodaks-new-100-5-megapixel-cam/</guid><description><![CDATA[Sorry cooper-dog but you may want to lQQk closer at the pic on you web page because it lQQks like sh*t]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[opticalwizard]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Aug 5th 2007 11:46PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak's New $100 5 Megapixel Cam]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/07/24/kodaks-new-100-5-megapixel-cam/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/07/24/kodaks-new-100-5-megapixel-cam/</guid><description><![CDATA[I have a Kodak easyshare and bought one for my son. We both love them. They ARE easy to use. Push one button and your pictures go into your computer. Push one button and you can email them. Sounds easy to me. And we get good pictures from them. No digital picture is the equal of a picture made from a negative. To say that they are is to lie to yourself big time. Kodak easyshare provides a good product for a reasonable price.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Roberta]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 25th 2007 7:07AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak's New $100 5 Megapixel Cam]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/07/24/kodaks-new-100-5-megapixel-cam/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/07/24/kodaks-new-100-5-megapixel-cam/</guid><description><![CDATA[So Dave, where do you work?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Debbie C]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 25th 2007 2:31PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak's New $100 5 Megapixel Cam]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/07/24/kodaks-new-100-5-megapixel-cam/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/07/24/kodaks-new-100-5-megapixel-cam/</guid><description><![CDATA[I went to a "professional" camera store and purchased SAMSUNG S630 1 month ago... Spent about $150.00 for the camera and 3MB in digital cards.<br><br>I have a NIKON 35mm SLR and wondering if anyone will ever invent some sort of conversion kit that will allow a 35mm film camers to take digital photos.....]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[sparky919]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 25th 2007 9:36AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak's New $100 5 Megapixel Cam]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/07/24/kodaks-new-100-5-megapixel-cam/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/07/24/kodaks-new-100-5-megapixel-cam/</guid><description><![CDATA[Two names Knock you out of the running..NIKON and CANON..<br>No one gets excited about buying a KODAK digital. There time has come and gone..<br>Techs fell asleep.<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[pete]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 25th 2007 8:39AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak's New $100 5 Megapixel Cam]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/07/24/kodaks-new-100-5-megapixel-cam/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/07/24/kodaks-new-100-5-megapixel-cam/</guid><description><![CDATA[And your point is?......]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Terry]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 25th 2007 8:48AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak's New $100 5 Megapixel Cam]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/07/24/kodaks-new-100-5-megapixel-cam/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/07/24/kodaks-new-100-5-megapixel-cam/</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm biased because I'm a Rochester native, and I'll admit I'm a Kodak supporter.  That said, I've done some research, and there are some cameras with great specs in the $79 to $200 range.  Kodak website lists the C513 for $79.95 at <br><a href="http://www.kodak.com/eknec/PageQuerier.jhtml?pq-path=9/19/32/11189&pq-locale=en_US" rel="nofollow">http://www.kodak.com/eknec/PageQuerier.jhtml?pq-path=9/19/32/11189&pq-locale=en_US</a><br><br>  In addition, Kodak was citing a JD Power report on their website.  I went to JD Power's website and looked it up myself.  Here's what it said:<br>"Within the $200-$399 segment, in which the majority of cameras are purchased, Kodak ranks highest for a third consecutive year. Kodak receives top ratings from customers in four of the six factors that determine overall satisfaction: cost, connectivity, ease of use and picture quality. Sony follows Kodak in the rankings."<br>     <br>Not too shabby. There are a lot of cameras in this price range- check out <br><br><a href="http://www.kodak.com/eknec/PageQuerier.jhtml?pq-path=4643&pq-locale=en_US" rel="nofollow">http://www.kodak.com/eknec/PageQuerier.jhtml?pq-path=4643&pq-locale=en_US</a><br><br>From experience, we had a Kodak digital camera at work.  Then they bought a second one.  The staff's consensus was that the Kodak was the easiest, most user friendly one.  I originally used the Kodak; then moved "up" to the other one when we got it.  I actually thought the person I passed the Kodak on to got the better end of the deal.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[NBachers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 25th 2007 6:54PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Kodak's New $100 5 Megapixel Cam]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/07/24/kodaks-new-100-5-megapixel-cam/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/07/24/kodaks-new-100-5-megapixel-cam/</guid><description><![CDATA[The people who just love their Kodaks are not professional photographers. They are folks like me. They need an easy-to-use inexpensive camera. A pro can easily see the difference in the equipment and photos between film and digital or Kodak -vs- the rest of the world. I'm a musician, my wife was not. We went to a Liberace concert. I picked up on a few 'sour' notes.  She's tone deaf. Get the picture? Buy what works best for you. Doesn't get any easier than that.]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[W.L. Barton]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Jul 25th 2007 8:23PM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
