The FBI's Spyware: Is it Watching You?
Privacy advocates, prepare thy letter writing hands. A student at Timberline High School, outside Seattle, Washington, has recently been arrested for calling in repeated bomb threats. That, you should have no problem with.The scary part is the manner in which he was caught and convicted. Josh Glazebook, 15, taunted authorities via e-mail and even created a MySpace profile called Timberlinebombinfo (shown), which used the alias Doug. It's through this profile that the FBI was able to track down Josh. Using a fake profile, the FBI sent a message to Timberlinebombinfo that installed a hacker-style trojan horse on his PC. The FBI spyware collected a wide range of information including the computer's IP address, MAC address, open ports, a list of running programs, the operating system type, version and serial number, preferred Internet browser and version, the computer's registered owner and registered company name, the current logged-in user name, the last-visited URL and the IP Address of every computer it connects to. Phew...
The FBI was able to install this program without a suspect or wiretap warrant because "under a ruling this month by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ... Internet users have no 'reasonable expectation of privacy' in the data when using the Internet."
So note: Simply using the Internet disqualifies you from normal expectations of privacy and safety of your data.
See Wired for the full story.
Related Links:
- 1,000 Cell Phones Smuggled Into CA Prisons
- Man Charged for Using Cafe's Free Wi-Fi
- MySpace Hands Over Sex Offender Data





Whitney Houston Dead: Singer Dies at 48, Body Found in Beverly Hilton Hotel
Whitney Houston Autopsy: Cause of Death Determined?
Whitney Houston, Bobbi Kristina: Late Singer's Daughter Hospitalized
Whitney Houston Dead: Stars React to Legend's Sudden Death
Adele Five-Year Break? Singer Plans to Focus on Relationship, Write 'Happy Record'
Jennifer Hudson Whitney Tribute: Grammy President Reveals Why Singer Was Chosen for Musical Memorial
Grammy 2012 Winners' List: Adele Sweeps Music's Biggest Night
5-Hour Energy: A Success Equal Parts Caffeine, Chemistry and Meditation
3 Economic Misconceptions That Need to Die
People With Easy-To-Pronounce Names More Likely To Succeed, Study Says















Comments
126
Subscribe to commentsDonRFeb 5th 2008 1:07AM
So it's ok with some of you that if you call or email a lover or spouse and have a very personal conversation it's ok for the government to listen in. If so you not only have lost your sanity,you have also lost your freedom!
OldJimFeb 26th 2008 8:57PM
Reference my comments last July about the Prattville, AL PD. I doubt if the Sgt. in charge there had anything to do with the hacking at my residence. I apologize to him.
I received over a span of time, many IMs with meaningless addresses. In flustration, I replied to two, only to be invited to "meet a girl" at a motel. When I asked the senders badge number, they disconnected. Who was it? I have no idea. I Googled the name at that time and no response was found. An imposter? Someone playing games? We can only guess BUT the fact remains, someone had targeted me for some unknown reason. It is time for Congress to put some guts in getting rid of spam and unsolicited perverted Internet individuals and companies.
JimAndersonFeb 27th 2008 10:47PM
Test
JenniferJul 23rd 2007 2:05PM
I say go for it.
Daniel S. MawnJul 23rd 2007 2:14PM
This doesn't bother me at all, in fact it's about time this info got out. To many times I'm apalled at what is sent over AOL's "post your thoughts". These sick people out there need to know that they aren't really hiding behind their fake identities. that sooner or later someone will come knocking at their door! But to all those who fear "Big Brother" is watching....if you've done nothing wrong then you have no fear!
Harold CJul 24th 2007 12:47PM
Let me see if I have this right: one sends comments,etc. on the internet for the whole universe to see,and now they're complaining about 'privacy?? Duh,duh. Plese,give me a break. No wonder those padded cells are empty-they're all on the internet.
PennyJul 23rd 2007 2:43PM
I agree..I think if it's a way to stop people from terrorizing, abusing or doing any kind of crime, I believe our Federal Goverment should have access to any information to proceed to stop the person/persons..However, I don't feel as if this should be done at State level and our local police dept. is given access to one's privacy..
GailJul 23rd 2007 2:41PM
GREAT!!!
Common-Sense PrevailsJul 23rd 2007 2:45PM
DANIEL MAWN - I totally agree...couldn't have said it better myself!
To all those who claim that big brother thrives on public fear: Not all of us shutter at the thought of someone checking what they're doing. What marginal behavior of yours are you afraid they'll detect?
JasonJul 23rd 2007 2:51PM
Yeah...say hello to Big Brother.
You people and your willingness to surrender your freedoms is disgusting.
Yes THIS KID needed to be caught.
But what about some time in the not so distant future you're talking to someone about the time you tried pot in college but didn't like it. Guess what? It's an admission to a crime that law enforcement has access to and now you can go to jail because you willingly applauded letting go of your freedoms.
TrazJul 23rd 2007 8:10PM
I see nothing wrong with doing what the FBI did. They did NOT target some innocent person randomly, they targeted someone who threatened to bomb a school. In my opinion, the kid who made the threat was a complete idiot.
MichaelJul 23rd 2007 2:53PM
Absolutely I agree that people should be held accountable for their actions both on- and offline. However there should be a system of checks and balances such as exist everywhere else (i.e. search and seizure warrants). As near as I can tell from this article there WAS probable cause but no real procedure applied here. As far as Big Brother...he is watching. I've nothing to hide, however I like my privacy very much. I refuse to bow to the moral or any other majority as far as my privacy is concerned and having something to hide or not is irrelevant. So no I won't be polishing my jack boots and marching down the street yelling "For the greater good" and "Resistance is futile" at the top of my poor ignorant lungs. Wait this just in....Patriot act: 1 Constituion: 0. I suppose there is no privacy anymore. Look it up. I'll be waiting for the men in the black ops gear to bust in to arrest me and my family for exersizing my rights that used to exist. RIP
Tigermoon638Jul 23rd 2007 2:54PM
Does this mean that hacking is now legal?
keithJul 23rd 2007 3:03PM
to all you minions who are ready to give up all your privacy to our govt.
I'm sick of the old saying" if you aren't doing anything wrong, there's nothing to worry about"
That's BS. What you are doing you may think it's not wrong, but others have different ideas about it. One of these days, they'll show up at your front door or your job. Then remember, you asked for it. Naive dumb-asses.
wahooJul 23rd 2007 3:12PM
yea that means hacking in legal now
dal33t1313Jul 23rd 2007 3:28PM
Don't be stupid!!
Viruses don't solve a thing!!!
lnnstr9Jul 23rd 2007 3:30PM
As in 1930s Germany, If you're not Jewish,Gypsy,Gay,Jehovah Witness or any number of different folks then you have nothing to worry about. {Remember the frog in the pan}
geoffJul 23rd 2007 3:40PM
If you have nothing to hide there is nothing to worry about.
grif8013Jul 23rd 2007 3:39PM
The FBI was able to install this program without a suspect or wiretap warrant because "under a ruling this month by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ... Internet users have no 'reasonable expectation of privacy' in the data when using the Internet
Thats a scarry ruling if you ask me...Yeah its great they were able to catch this kid...but think about this each and every time you use the internet to pay a bill or search for something. If the government is able to create this type of softeare and tap into your privacy at any time and for any reason it's definately contradicting what the constitution stands for and we are left without any privacy. Warrantless search and seizure is prohibited by the contitution. We the people are provided this in the 4th amendment people. In todays world so much of the internet focuses on strictly telling customers or consumers that the data is exactly that "PRIVATE" What about that? Or the other false advertising that goes on or anything else...
DonnJul 23rd 2007 3:41PM
Just to head off the trolls. The FBI got a warrant from a federal judge to use this, just like if they wanted a search warrant.