The Raciest Ads on the Web

of course victoria's secret ads are too racy fools, obviously the only people voting are lesbians and guys.
ive seen more skin in a porno than a typical american ad, you guys are sick here, sick

Ok, what the hell is this? It's underwear! It's not the actual clothing that make people uncomfortable, it's its use. I'm so sick of people whinning & complaining about stupid things, out of ALL the things you could post about, you picked 'underwear ads'? This is most certainly not one of your best stories.

& when you use a word like 'sleazy' it makes you look like a biased a$$hole.

Look the Men are prbably gay and the women dykes lol

Only thing racy about the Gingh Gonch ad is that the guy stading on the fence has a flat butt. Where's the bubble butt as in other ads they have.

They aren't even wearing thongs. It covers there whole bottom. OMG WHO MADE THIS COLUMN?!!?!
whoever made this column is so stupid, of course 18 and over sites and magazines and lingire companies are going to be a LITTLE bit racy. BArely racy. WHAT KIND OF SUPER IDIOT THOUGHT THAT WOULD BE TOO RACY . AND ALSO, AS long as there's no nudity, why is it racy at all!?!!? Just look at the polls. Whoever started this column should quit life.

Victorias Secret are no more than soft porn. They should be taken off of the public air and put in the back room with all of the other sicko pornography.

It's the human body, there's nothing wrong with it. People see just as much at the beach. This country is so backwards compared to others. The good Lord gave us these bodies, fat, skinny, in shape and not. We need to get over the shock of seeing someone nude, or wearing underwear...lol
Nothing different between underwear and a bikini, or a speedo, which I wouldn't wear, but to each his/her own.
Personally I hate all commercials, but I'm not going to complain about content, especially when it come to the human body.

Dave

The parents complaining about racy ads are the same ones that were banging away in a van in the 60's and 70's.

compared to other countries, these ads are mild as compared to european ads.

ALL I HAVE TO SAY IS ITS HOT AND SEX SELLS SO STOP HATTING THE TRUTH

i wouldn't say the ads are too "racy" or whatever that's supposed to mean. they don't do anything for me one way or the other (and i'm a streight guy). but then, some of these complainers seem to know more about porn than i do.

Somehow I doubt that commenting on the subjective is worth while. Morality is morality and nothing more. It's sort of like the missionary that goes into a primitive tribal society and finds the women bare-breasted. It did not bother them, but it bothered us. Japanese families bathed together, quite nude, as you would if you are taking a bath. Simply a matter of what society you live in. Here, we preach a victorian style, but names in the madams book keep appearing. Funny, the names that appear frequently belong to those that advocate these tight beliefs. I choose not to worry too much about underware ads undermining our society. Humans are humans and this has been going on since biblical times and the bible says so. Amen.

Life it's self is a beautiful thing lay back enjoy it COMPLAINER'S YOUR SO SIMPLE MINDED EVEN A CAVE MAN COULD DO YOU

You can tell some people here are either ashamed of there looks or from a red state!
loosen up people god is not going to strike you down for looking at a half dressed or nude model...

Puritanical culture vs.the Sexual Revolution.Would the ads be any more offensive if the Supreme court made a law banning them?People can always switch chanels if they offend.Whether the models are gay or lesbian or not seems kind of sexist..people just making a living. Lighten up, OK?

well i think the ads are a lil overboard,even though victoria secret is a lingerie store and what not, they still should advertise in a more covered up. make the person want the underwear, not be discouraged by the anorexic model wearing them. also kids watch t.v and i know i dont want my lil bro watching commercials like this

Everyond who says, "sex sells" or "get over it, it's a free country" says so because they enjoy such ads. they might as well buy these products because sex sells.

I have no problem with partial nudity or even full nudity in advertising. I just wish advertisers would follow Dove's lead and show people who are less than perfect. The human body is a thing of beauty.
Also, we all enjoy a good dirty thought from time to time. Just admit it and stop giving yourself a guilt trip, then force others to join you.

BlueStarAmy...........don't know what she is talking about.......creative art form, body , skin? do u need a dictionary? Oh please, nudity goes back during the Roman timesm this is nothing, using it in an art form It is fine, but for all the wrong reasons then it is ugly.

It's not the clothing that makes these ads too racy. It is the outright sexual nature of some of the facial expressions, motions and poses. Of course, its not bad to show the body in any amount of coverage - even totaly nude - the human body is beautiful in all forms; it is simply that most people would agree they wouldn't have people walking around their house in front of their children in these provocative ways. Freedom of speech is paramount but there should be some respect for the overall decency of what is available for children and adolecents to watch on T.V., see in mags and on billboards. Like it or not everyone is influenced to some degree by what they see and children are most suceptible. Responsible adults do make up part of public opinion.