Switched Archives
June 2012
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |||||
| 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 |
| 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 |
| 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 |
| 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
Blackberry 101 | Best Tablets | Best iPhone 4 Case | Color App | Facebook Questions | NCAA Brackets | Lady Gaga at Google | Facebook Deals | Animated GIF | Anonymous | Amazon Appstore | April Fools' Day | Google Blogger | Rebecca Black Friday | Nintendo 3DS | Vimeo iPhone App | Video Game Emulators | Private Browsing | Mark Bao | Julian Assange | What is 4G? | Bronx Zoo Cobra | iPad 2 Review | Google 1 | New York Times Paywall
- Leila Brillson
I do not want this.
- Joshua Fruhlinger
Misconceptions about LA. Interesting read, but kinda whiney. http://t.co/jEqHw3ts
- Tim Stevens
The people responsible for this tremendous geographical oversight have been sacked.







Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
(Unverified)Aug 6th 2007 4:09PM
The credit card issuers, and holders, have eevery opportunity to reduce credit card for by a high margin.
There is plenty of room on the front of credit cards for a picture and a one liner that states Picture ID Required.
Merchants who don't check ID should be held accountable as should credit card issuers who issue cards witout the picture and picture ID requirement, not the card holder.
The PIN could also be increased to 6 numbers. If we can remember a hundred telephone numbers. a 6 digit PIN should be no problem.