<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Switched - Comments for Cell Phones Versus Terrorists</title>
<link>http://www.switched.com/2007/05/04/cell-phones-versus-terrorists/</link>
<description>Switched Comments for Cell Phones Versus Terrorists</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cell Phones Versus Terrorists]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/05/04/cell-phones-versus-terrorists/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/05/04/cell-phones-versus-terrorists/</guid><description><![CDATA[Great idea, the frikkin privacy advocates that oppose it are the same people who would condone terrorist activities in the name of "free speech" or some other such crap. BTW, try a dictionary instead of just spelchek, "Calvary" was the site of Christ's crucifixion; the word you're groping for is "cavalry."]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 4th 2007 8:37PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cell Phones Versus Terrorists]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/05/04/cell-phones-versus-terrorists/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/05/04/cell-phones-versus-terrorists/</guid><description><![CDATA[ditto, Steve, i couldn't agree with you more. what's really amazing though is someone who is articulate and can spell. Nancy]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nancy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 4th 2007 11:18PM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cell Phones Versus Terrorists]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/05/04/cell-phones-versus-terrorists/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/05/04/cell-phones-versus-terrorists/</guid><description><![CDATA[Who's the ignoramus that doesn't know the difference between calvary and cavalry ?<br>Get him or her off your staff !!<br>What else does this dummy not know ?<br>Dr. Esquivel]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Roland Esquivel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 12:37AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cell Phones Versus Terrorists]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/05/04/cell-phones-versus-terrorists/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/05/04/cell-phones-versus-terrorists/</guid><description><![CDATA[nancy why don't you and steve just get a room?]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[bobo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 12:41AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cell Phones Versus Terrorists]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/05/04/cell-phones-versus-terrorists/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/05/04/cell-phones-versus-terrorists/</guid><description><![CDATA[Now back to the content of the story. Technically it is of course feasible, but for sure it would be difficult to sell such a cell phone. Adding that feature will make the cell phone bigger, heavier and shorten battery life. Then indeed who says the phone is not sending your location to home land security all the time? And what does the user get in return? Nada! <br>So you are looking at either some heafty subsidies or a new law (making the feature mandatory in all new cell phones) to make this fly. <br>I for one wouldn't want such a phone (and pay more to avoid it).<br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr engineer]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 1:58AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cell Phones Versus Terrorists]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/05/04/cell-phones-versus-terrorists/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/05/04/cell-phones-versus-terrorists/</guid><description><![CDATA[NO Steve. You & your dictionary. It was actually Jesus they cruicified. You can't cruicify a spirit. <br>You've not visited any counties where privacy is thought to be some city in Greenland? Try it before you run your mouth, again. ]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[YesPrivacy]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 6:16AM</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Comments on Cell Phones Versus Terrorists]]></title><link>http://www.switched.com/2007/05/04/cell-phones-versus-terrorists/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.switched.com/2007/05/04/cell-phones-versus-terrorists/</guid><description><![CDATA[Out of 5 comments, three are bitching about the writer allegedly using the word "calvary" as opposed to "cavalry.<br>Unless the writer changed the article word in question after the complaints, those three complainers are wrong.  The writer used the correct word "CAVALRY".<br><br>Quote: "While a lone signal would most likely be treated as a false positive, multiple hits in a single area would bring out the cavalry."<br><br>Clean your freakin glasses off. Your dyslexia is showing. The writer got it right.<br><br><br>]]></description><dc:creator><![CDATA[soulcage]]></dc:creator><pubDate>May 5th 2007 11:31AM</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
