Not-So-Earth-Friendly Tech (7)
As much as we love their mammoth sizes and stunning displays, plasmas are energy hogs. The typical 42-inch plasma screen uses 250 watts of juice, while an LCD of the same size uses only 150 watts. The reason for the difference has to do with how the two technologies display their pictures. LCDs employ a backlight, and display colors by blocking certain pixels from being displayed at a certain moment. This result is a fairly steady level of juice being used while you watch your latest Netflix arrival. In plasmas, on the other hand, each pixel is its own lighting element, and must therefore be turned on when the on-screen action requires it, suckling much more power out of your outlets as a result.More Earth-Related Links:





Whitney Houston Autopsy: Cause of Death Determined?
Whitney Houston, Bobbi Kristina: Late Singer's Daughter Hospitalized
Adele Five-Year Break? Singer Plans to Focus on Relationship, Write 'Happy Record'
Jennifer Hudson Whitney Tribute: Grammy President Reveals Why Singer Was Chosen for Musical Memorial
Grammy 2012 Winners' List: Adele Sweeps Music's Biggest Night
Whitney Houston Dead: Stars React to Legend's Sudden Death
3 Economic Misconceptions That Need to Die
5-Hour Energy: A Success Equal Parts Caffeine, Chemistry and Meditation
People With Easy-To-Pronounce Names More Likely To Succeed, Study Says
Katy Perry Grammy Performance 2012: Did the Diva Diss Her Ex-Hubby With Revealing New Song?














Comments
26
Subscribe to commentsrick nortonApr 23rd 2007 6:19AM
The eco friendly flashlight you ballyhooed is a product that goes far in promise alone. Have you tried one? I did! If you find yourself in a situation where you need a light source and it's all you have, you will know what a low-tech item it really is. It just doesn't work very well at all.
KarolApr 19th 2007 7:23AM
I don't have to worry about this.. I can't afford to purchase one! Some days it pays to be poor!
LanceApr 19th 2007 7:36AM
250 Watts! Give me a break. Thats only a little more than a couple of light bulbs. Just for the record thats is consideratable less power than the T.V.'s of the 60's
CARL HARMONApr 19th 2007 7:56AM
Like most things today, most of us feel a sense of entitlement to use what 'WE WORK SO HARD FOR'. Unfortunately, it doesn't have anything to do with the brotherhood of man, or far-reaching thinking. ' I won't be around when it happens'.
annaApr 19th 2007 8:07AM
After reading your "report" on gadgets and the ozone, I am not surprised to find that these (everybody has to have one) items are not sucking life out of our planet. I personally couldn't afford any of these items except a cell phone, which by the way I don't have. I do not like, nor need one. I find them highly annoying and impersonal. I do not like to know everything that is happening in a strangers life. People are crude and rude and have no respect for anyone within hearing zone. They curse, talk about highly personal and disgusting things in public. Are they really that needed?
GerryApr 19th 2007 7:49AM
Maybe even more critical is the amount of energy used by all our "instant on" apppliances, such as televisions, when they are turned "off", because they never really go off. They draw current all the time so they can instantly come on. Most people don't know this, and those that do don't usually unplug these appliances to save energy because then they lose their memorized settings. Perhaps some of these items could have small batteries that made it possible to retain the memory, so they could be truly turned "off".
BodsferdApr 19th 2007 7:54AM
How come when ever theres somehting on AOL that says something like check out these top ten earth killers they only list 7 to 9 and never ten? In this case its 7. And also why does the first one start with number 2 when thew first is clearly an introduction? AOL WHAT IS THIS BLASPEMY!!
D heitkampApr 19th 2007 8:00AM
I have the anwser....... Scrap all our tech Toys , running water , cars and electricity and go back to living in caves
LostCauseApr 19th 2007 8:02AM
What's the point of having a plasma TV??
My TV is about 10 years old and it works fine as it did when I got it and the picture quality is great. I would NEVER spend that much money for a television.
mikedeepwaterApr 19th 2007 8:09AM
what about those millions of (try aol disks)that they send in the mail and force feed you when entering a store think aol has no right to speak out against my tv ass h les!!!
JApr 19th 2007 8:13AM
I drive an Audi. I use a cell phone. I have an Apple iPod. I use many blank discs. I am looking at a new computer w/Vista. I have a 42" plasma TV. Does that make me a horrible person?
John from EastwoodApr 19th 2007 8:18AM
Isn't it strange, we treat this planet, as if we had another one to go to.!!!????????#$%@#$
Pamela SalazarApr 19th 2007 8:19AM
Technology has had the choice for decades to for cars that run things other than gasoline.
yet, these cars were being shot down...why...gee whiz...the gasoline moguls wouldn't be making money..let's continue to make them richer...so how about a carpool...put us at a disadvantage so these moguls can become richer still ( do you think THEY will carpool?)...don't want to step on any toes...Pollution...could have been under control years ago..but then the rich company lords wouldn't be as rich now, would they..so let's blame the average person, they're stupid and believe what we tell them. they will forget what we wouldn't let happen, so these "The Rich" could get richer at the expense of our planet...Look where we're at now!!!
MxkingApr 19th 2007 8:22AM
Hey,Lance! If you're still stuck in the 60's then go back!
mrfar2youApr 19th 2007 9:16AM
I think we all know the problems so where are the solutions. Good point about the AOL disks that are out in the millions. What about a hydrogen powered car? AOL why don't you guys throw in a billion or two for development?
AJApr 19th 2007 8:33AM
I'm with anna. Cell phones are an unnecessary waste of resources, except for those with overblown egos who like to look "important" to others around them, and when the radiation form them finally drives away all of the bees and we have massive crop failure, maybe something will be done about them.
Widescreen plasma (or LCD) TV's are another waste. How long before they won't be good enough, when people will turn an entire wall into a video screen...then wonder why they're in debt up to their ears. For chrissakes, get your fat, lazy asses outdoors and ride a bike or something!
PamApr 19th 2007 8:32AM
Blaming people and these products make me sick...we're not stupid...blame lies with the company heads and the government..not us!!!Government doesn't want to step on any rich toes, thus, allowing these products to be made and NOT allowing products to be made that would truly help. The ozone layer, I don't hear anyone blaming all the rockets that are going up in space through the ozone layer, jets with their exhaust spewed all over the sky, not to mentio diesel trucks, buses, etc that stink with exhaust. Let's blame an aerosol can in my house for that...etc, etc, etc..come people think..
SueApr 19th 2007 12:55PM
I absolutely agree with Bodsferd. That's all I can say on the subject. You go Bodsferd!!
bobstaylorApr 19th 2007 11:53PM
AOL reminds me of Chicken Little. "The sky is falling, the sky is falling". Iy'd cold here in the northeast, I WANT MY FAR SHARE OF GLOBAL WARMING. Al Gore said GLOBAL WARMING is here but I'm still freezing. I gonna burn me some CD's and see if I can get the temps up a bit. Maybe I'll buy a new computer and insist on insalling VISTA, if that's what it takes then let's do it! What ego's we have when we believe that we can distroy Mother Nature, and the planet. The very best we can do is to eradicat our selves from the planet. But this planet willl out survive us. Open your eyes you lemmings. Challange this liberal crap. Think!!
Greg in GeorgiaApr 19th 2007 8:41AM
Hey Pamela: Perhaps the reason that some alternative fuels are not being used is because the Feds spent huge amounts of effort, time, and money destroying the production of alcohol from corn and sugar.
Only difference is it was called moonshine or white lightening rather than an alternative fuel source. Are they afraid we'll be sipping on our gas tanks?